Top 10 AI Prompts and Use Cases and in the Government Industry in Ukraine

In Ukraine, precise AI prompts are already the difference between useful tools and unusable noise: clear prompts help the new Ministry of Digital Transformation “AI Gateway” turn policy, sandboxes, and sector guidance into testable products for startups and agencies (Ukraine AI Gateway (official site)), while the Diia portal's world‑first AI assistant shows how well‑crafted user prompts speed access to services and official documents in practice (Diia AI assistant launch and details).

For defense and situational awareness, CSIS finds that systems like Delta depend on rich, context‑aware prompts plus human‑in‑the‑loop checks to turn multi‑source ISR into timely, reliable action (CSIS report on military AI in Ukraine); that blend of prompt design, regulatory safeguards, and practical training makes prompt literacy a public‑sector essential in Ukraine.

Bootcamp	Length	Cost (early bird)	Registration
AI Essentials for Work	15 Weeks	$3,582	Register for Nucamp AI Essentials for Work (registration)

Source: Government AI Readiness Index 2023, Oxford Insights.

Selection balanced policy rigor, operational readiness, and clear mission value: use cases were drawn from public inventories and sector analyses to favor deployments that are both high-impact and responsibly governed.

Guidance from the federal

AI in Action

review and OMB frameworks (which note roughly 13% of federal AI use cases could affect rights or safety) helped filter candidates for ethical risk and mitigation needs 2024 Federal AI Use Case Inventory - AI in Action (CIO.gov); the DHS AI Use Case Inventory supplied granular deployment signals - DHS flagged 39 safety/rights‑impacting cases, 28 of which were already deployed - so deployment status was weighted heavily DHS AI Use Case Inventory (DHS.gov).

Sector fit and likely return on investment came from Deloitte's Government and Public Services analysis, which highlights defense, citizen services, and back‑office automation as priority areas Deloitte Government & Public Services AI Dossier.

Practical constraints such as bandwidth, on‑device compute, and annotation needs (noted in Nucamp field reports) rounded out the method: prioritize cases that are rights‑aware, already field‑tested or near deployment, and technically feasible for Ukraine's operational environment - because a usable model delivered to a platoon or a passport clerk matters more than a perfect prototype that never leaves the lab.

Methodology Criterion	Evidence Source / Signal
Safety & rights assessment	Federal inventories & OMB guidance (~13% rights/safety‑impacting) - CIO/DHS
Deployment status	DHS inventory counts (39 identified; 28 deployed)
Sector impact & ROI	Deloitte GPS AI Dossier
Operational feasibility	Nucamp notes on low‑cost on‑device AI and annotation workflows

Delta acts as the battalion's “single pane” for fast, multi‑source ISR: it ingests drone and satellite video, photos, acoustic feeds and unstructured text to produce a Common Operating Picture that commanders can use in near‑real‑time.

By fusing these streams - what classic MPMSDF frameworks call a Common Operational Picture - Delta turns noisy, high‑volume sensor output into prioritized tracks and alerts that reduce analyst overload and keep the human decision maker in the loop (MPMSDF Common Operational Picture data fusion primer).

In Ukraine this matters: Delta's integration with acoustic sensors like Zvook and platforms such as Griselda for text/voice analysis speeds the path from raw signal to actionable cue (some acoustic detections reach Delta in ~12 seconds), while onboard ATR and navigation modules feed verified tracks so commanders see a coherent operational picture instead of disconnected feeds (CSIS analysis of Ukraine's AI-enabled autonomous warfare capabilities).

The result is a practical battlefield tool: operators seeing fused tracks and alerts can task a drone or artillery battery faster, even under EW stress, because the COP collapses complexity into clear, trusted options (Space Force case study: Delta COP integration for enhanced situational awareness).

Data stream / capability	Representative metric
Acoustic (Zvook)	≈20,000 km² coverage; detections to 4.8 km (drones), 6.9 km (cruise); ≈12s to Delta; ~1.6% false positives
Automatic Target Recognition (ATR)	Target recognition ranges up to ~2 km (optimal conditions)
Multisource fusion (Delta)	Consolidates video, imagery, acoustic, and text into single operational picture

“With the addition of the near real time data flow from the JCO, operators have situational awareness of orbital threats and more time to make critical decisions,” - Spc. 4 Jack Wallace, Space Delta 8

ZIR and VGI‑9 are two complementary pieces of the ATR puzzle that turn sensor floods into prioritized, actionable options for Ukrainian commanders: ZIR's compact “soap‑bar” autonomy kit embeds an onboard model and ArduPilot navigation to detect targets at ~1 km and autonomously engage out to ~3 km even in GPS‑denied and EW environments, while VGI‑9's optical guidance module delivers high‑FPS (40+ FPS) video, secure PIN activation, cruise‑control for jammed corridors, and one‑button autonomous lock‑and‑strike against moving targets up to 80 km/h (effective visual range ~100–2,000 m, altitudes 20–250 m) - together they shift routine ID and scoring to the edge so analysts see a short ranked list instead of a wall of imagery.

That edge scoring uses threat, proximity, and mission intent to surface high‑priority targets while keeping humans in the loop for final engagement decisions, reducing time from detection to tasking and lowering false positives in contested airspace; see VGI‑9's system overview and the CSIS case study on Ukrainian ATR adoption for operational context and system tradeoffs (VGI‑9 optical guidance system specifications and CSIS analysis of Ukraine's AI‑enabled autonomous warfare capabilities).

System	Key metrics
VGI‑9	Visual range 100–2,000 m; altitude 20–250 m; 40+ FPS; locks moving targets up to 80 km/h; cruise control for EW
ZIR (autonomy kit)	Detection ≈1 km; autonomous engagement ≈3 km; ArduPilot-based navigation; weeks–month to integrate
ATR (general)	Onboard ATR up to ~2 km in optimal conditions; prioritizes targets by threat/proximity

“On the battlefield I did not see a single Ukrainian soldier. Only drones. I saw them [Ukrainian soldiers] only when I surrendered. Only drones, and there are lots and lots of them. Guys, don't come. It's a drone war.”

Shield AI's V‑BAT and its Hivemind autonomy stack solve the “last‑mile” navigation problem that matters most on Ukraine's frontlines: by running sensing, state‑estimation, mapping, planning and controls entirely onboard, V‑BATs keep flying and tasking even when GNSS and comms are jammed, letting a single operator manage multiple airframes while each platform intelligently reroutes, landings are automated, and teams share opportunistic world models (Shield AI Hivemind autonomy V‑BAT overview).

That on‑edge design is not theoretical - V‑BATs proved resilient in Ukraine, operating under seven jammers, flying 8–11 hour sorties from launch points 25 miles behind the line and even relaying a Buk detection that helped direct a strike - so autonomy becomes the practical difference between a stalled ISR feed and an actionable strike option (V‑BAT combat performance in Ukraine).

The platform's recent SATCOM and heavy‑fuel upgrades extend range and shipboard utility, while visibility‑graph and Dubins‑based planning keep on‑device computation lean - one vivid result: a V‑BAT that can drop out of the sky, land itself on a pitching deck and still rejoin a coordinated mission without human micromanagement.

Capability	Representative metric / note
Endurance	≈13 hours (heavy‑fuel upgrades)
GNSS/comms resilience	Onboard autonomy; proven in jamming (operated under seven jammers)
VTOL / recovery	Fully unassisted vertical launch & landing; shipborne recovery
Operational record (Ukraine)	Long‑range ISR/strike support; reported detection contributing to Buk strike; 160 combat sorties (to June 2025)

“V‑BAT was built for the types of missions the Dutch Navy and Marine Corps are preparing for - dynamic, distributed, and high‑stakes. It's operational today, proven in the most demanding combat environments, and delivers mission‑critical capabilities unmatched by any other system.” - Brandon Tseng, Shield AI

Zvook leverages cheap, networked acoustic sensors and machine learning to plug the low‑altitude holes that radars often miss, turning propeller and engine signatures into rapid, prioritized alerts that feed the Delta common operating picture; in practice that means acoustic detections (covering roughly 20,000 km² in reported deployments) can reach Delta in about 12 seconds and flag drones, helicopters, cruise missiles and jets at ranges of several kilometers so mobile teams can act before an incoming threat lands or explodes (CSIS analysis of Ukraine's AI-enabled autonomous warfare capabilities).

Built from parabolic mirrors, microphones and focused datasets, Zvook scaled quickly (about 40 deployed nodes and covering ~5% of the country in early iterations) and even solved a memorable “cow problem” - engineers spent a month eliminating false alarms caused by livestock - underscoring how rapid data‑labeling and on‑the‑ground iteration turn a grassroots sensor into a trusted cue for shooters and shelters alike (United24 coverage of the Sky Fortress acoustic detection system; Zvook acoustic detection project page).

Metric	Representative value
Coverage (reported)	≈20,000 km² (network deployments)
Detection range	Drones ≈4.8 km; cruise missiles ≈6.9 km
Latency to COP (Delta)	≈12 seconds
False positives	≈1.6% (improved with training)
Deployment footprint	~40 nodes; Zvook covers ~5% of Ukrainian territory (early)

“Zvook's acoustic sensors mounted on radio towers offer a silent shield in the sky - detecting drones without emitting signals, where traditional radar can't safely operate.”

Griselda's end‑to‑end data platform is designed to turn the chaos of unstructured messaging, social posts and field reports into fast, actionable cues - exactly the kind of disinformation‑detection and rapid‑response pipeline Ukraine needs when narratives and rumors can move faster than verification.

By automating ingestion from social networks and messengers, applying semantic analysis and geospatial tagging, and surfacing prioritized requests on interactive maps, Griselda's G‑Rescue workflow helps teams cut through volume to find the few signals that matter for shelters, civil‑service messaging, and infrastructure recovery; its Recovery Management System (RMS) then tracks restoration progress and logistics so insight becomes coordinated action.

These capabilities rest on the same toolkit the industry uses for difficult, multimodal feeds - NLP, ML, and scalable stores and search for unstructured data - so integrating with platforms built around Elasticsearch‑style indexing or MongoDB‑native pipelines makes rapid deployment and real‑time triage possible (Griselda - data IT solutions, unstructured data tools and pipelines, unstructured data & search).

One vivid payoff: turning thousands of noisy posts into a handful of geo‑tagged, verified requests that a response team can act on within the hour - concrete speed that saves time and reduces harm.

Product	Core capabilities
G‑Rescue	Automated social/messenger ingestion, semantic analysis, geospatial mapping, request prioritization, targeted notifications
Recovery Management System (RMS)	Centralized infrastructure tracking, request management, progress reporting, document/media storage

For Ukraine's post‑strike recovery and civilian protection, the fast, all‑weather eyes of SAR and high‑resolution optical imagery - when coupled with a fused COP like Delta - turn scattered reports into actionable recovery plans: Capella's SAR can image through clouds and at night, often delivering clear damage maps within 24 hours and even revealing

combed‑over patterns where forests or built areas have been stripped by wind or blast

(Capella SAR rapid damage mapping case study), while Maxar imagery paired with AI damage visualizers (for example Microsoft's AI for Good building damage pipeline) shows how automated models can flag likely building loss and prioritize field inspections (Maxar geospatial imagery and AI damage visualizers for damage assessment).

In practice, that means fewer boots on the ground wasted checking intact structures, faster insurance and logistics decisions, and recovery tasking that routes scarce crews to the worst‑hit neighborhoods first - concrete speed that translates into lives sheltered and services restored sooner.

Brave1 has become Ukraine's practical procurement and industrial‑scaling optimizer: by pairing a government‑backed marketplace and accelerated grant windows with military technical evaluation, the cluster helps turn lab prototypes into serial production lines that supply the front.

Recent Brave1 programs offer large-scale awards (grant competitions up to ₴100–150M for missile and explosives scaling, with mandatory 30% co‑financing) and a streamlined review cycle designed to cut decision time to roughly six weeks, so developers can pick funding sized to maturity and move from prototype to deployed kit faster (Brave1 DefenseTech coordination platform - official site, Brave1 grant program details - Ukrainian Ministry of Defense announcement).

The result: more local factories expanding lines for nitrocellulose, initiating explosives and guided munitions, a bigger domestic supply chain, and a shorter path from lab demo to battlefield impact - concrete speed that helps sustain operations when foreign deliveries lag.

Metric	Value / note
Total updated grant funding (2025)	₴2.7B (program allocation)
Top grant sizes	Up to ₴150M (explosives); ₴100M+ (missile development)
Co‑financing	30% required from applicants
Program speed	Average decision time shortened to ~6 weeks
Ecosystem reach	3.5K+ registered developments; 260+ grants (platform metrics)

“Such support will assist manufacturers in establishing or expanding production lines, acquiring equipment, chemical components, and systems, while enabling our defenders to deliver effective strikes against the enemy.” - Denys Shmyhal

The Ministry of Digital Transformation (MDT) is positioning itself as Ukraine's regulatory lab for safe AI adoption: its new Innovation Sandbox offers hands‑on legal, technical and business expertise so AI and blockchain teams can pilot products across public services, healthcare, agriculture, education and even national defense, refine compliance, and feed real test results back into smarter laws through October 2026 (MDT Innovation Sandbox - program details).

That pragmatic, bottom‑up stance - avoiding heavy preemptive limits while building voluntary guidance - is echoed in independent analysis of Ukraine's AI ecosystem, which notes MDT's soft, business‑friendly approach and emphasis on accelerating commercial technology adoption rather than prescriptive bans (CSIS report on Ukraine's military AI ecosystem).

Complementary regulatory tracks such as the NBU's sandbox for financial and payment innovations further show how tailored testing agreements, adaptive quotas, and monitored pilots (NBU tests run up to 12 months) create controlled environments where prototypes become policy‑ready solutions without stifling rapid iteration (NBU regulatory sandbox), a practical bridge from startup demo to government deployment that shortens the runway for useful, rights‑aware AI in Ukraine.

Sandbox feature	Representative detail
Support provided	Legal, technical and business expertise; custom audit & test plans
Eligible areas	AI, blockchain; public services, healthcare, agriculture, education, defense, infrastructure
Typical testing window	MDT program runs through Oct 2026; NBU tests up to 12 months (with extensions)

“The primary task of the regulatory sandbox is to promote the development of FinTech and innovative products in the financial and payment markets…to stimulate competition, improve the quality of financial and payment services, and deepen the regulator's dialogue with market participants.” - Oleksii Shaban, NBU Deputy Governor

The “Army of Drones” vision for Ukraine becomes practical when training is treated like a scalable product: Fort Rucker's Unmanned Advanced Lethality Course shows how a compact, repeatable curriculum - three weeks of classroom work, 20–25 hours of simulator time, live MOUT exercises, and hands‑on CAD/3D‑printing for repairs and parts - creates deployable crews who can fly, fix, and tactically employ FPV and one‑way systems under fire (Fort Rucker Unmanned Advanced Lethality Course (UALC) overview); allied pilots and trainers point to the same mix of “video‑game” simulators, mission rehearsal, and a Training Support Package/Mobile Training Package as the fastest route to unit‑level proficiency (report on the U.S. Army's first official drone course at Fort Rucker).

For Ukraine, the vivid payoff is immediate: the curriculum generator model turns a few dozen trained instructors and validated simulators into hundreds of field‑ready operators who can integrate onboard ATR, call for fires from drone feeds, and sustain fleets with locally 3D‑printed spares - shortening the path from classroom to combat while keeping human judgment central to engagement decisions.

Curriculum element	Representative metric / note
Course duration	3 weeks (Fort Rucker UALC)
Simulator time	20–25 hours (proficiency threshold)
Live training	MOUT/urban scenarios; Call‑for‑Fire integration
Manufacture & sustainment	CAD + 3D printing (resin, filament, carbon fiber)
Initial cohort size	28 students (current UALC enrollment)
Data collection	Performance tracking across five drone systems to inform procurement

“This course is a catch‑up,” - Capt. Rachel Martin, course director

Avengers and VEZHA turn battlefield sensor floods into trustworthy models only when the data behind them is engineered like a mission: clear objectives, a tight tagging taxonomy, and traceable QA gates that bind video, audio, image and text labels into a single validated feed for model training and regression testing.

In practice that means combining Human‑In‑The‑Loop validation for hard edge cases with programmatic/weak‑supervision and active‑learning loops to scale - Snorkel's guide shows how labeling functions and probabilistic labels accelerate domain‑specific datasets without losing expert oversight (Snorkel data labeling guide for domain-specific datasets) - while Roboflow's playbook underlines auditability, versioned schemas and auto‑assist tools (SAM/CLIP) to cut annotation time yet preserve pixel‑perfect ground truth for safety‑critical ATR and damage‑assessment models (Roboflow AI data-labeling playbook on auditability and versioning).

Operationally in Ukraine that workflow must prioritize privacy and in‑country experts for sensitive imagery, run small pilots to tune guidelines, and treat label drift as a live KPI - because a single noisy class definition or mislabeled cluster can silently cap mAP and turn a promising detector into a liability (labeling best practices guide).

For beginners in Ukraine the path forward is practical and measured: start by building prompt literacy and prompt‑testing habits in a safe sandbox, learn the governance basics the WINWIN AI Center of Excellence is rolling out for public‑sector pilots, and pair that with hands‑on skills training so prompts produce reliable outputs in real workflows (WINWIN AI Center of Excellence).

Prioritize small, monitored pilots that attach ethical review and human‑in‑the‑loop checkpoints (the WINWIN program and EU4Innovation support emphasize alignment with EU legislation and staged pilots), then scale only after you've proven that models reduce analyst load, speed recovery tasks, or turn noisy citizen reports into verified, geo‑tagged work items within the hour.

For career‑ready prompt and workplace AI skills, a concise applied course can shorten the learning curve: the AI Essentials for Work bootcamp teaches prompt writing, tool selection, and job‑based workflows so nontechnical civil servants and small vendors can contribute to safe deployments (Nucamp AI Essentials for Work bootcamp - registration).

The immediate goal: small experiments, clear metrics for safety and utility, and trained people who can spot label drift, bias, and mission risk before scale.

Bootcamp	Length	Cost (early bird)	Registration
AI Essentials for Work	15 Weeks	$3,582	Register for Nucamp AI Essentials for Work bootcamp