How AI Is Helping Healthcare Companies in New Zealand Cut Costs and Improve Efficiency

By Ludo Fourrage

Last Updated: September 12th 2025

Healthcare staff using AI tools at a New Zealand hospital—AI improving efficiency and cutting costs in New Zealand

Too Long; Didn't Read:

AI in New Zealand healthcare cuts admin costs and speeds care through automation, diagnostics and referrals - saving clinicians 30 minutes–2 hours/day, improving mammography specificity from 86% to 89%, enabling ERMS' 5 million referrals and supporting NZD611M in AI‑related RDTI spend.

AI matters for New Zealand healthcare because it's already being scrutinised at a national level - Health New Zealand's National Artificial Intelligence and Algorithm Expert Advisory Group is evaluating generative AI and large language models - and the technology is showing real, practical upside: faster image analysis and screening (including breast cancer detection), stronger system-wide insights and even help reducing language and cultural barriers to care, which can improve equity and speed decision-making.

At the same time, AI-powered diagnostics bring hard questions about liability and oversight - who is responsible if an algorithm errs - that New Zealand clinicians and leaders must confront.

For health managers looking to move from theory to safe practice, practical upskilling such as the Nucamp AI Essentials for Work syllabus can help teams apply AI tools, write effective prompts, and manage deployment risks while aiming to cut costs and boost efficiency.

Read more from Health NZ and the medico-legal perspective.

AttributeDetails
CourseAI Essentials for Work - practical AI skills for any workplace
Length15 Weeks
Cost$3,582 early bird; $3,942 afterwards
SyllabusNucamp AI Essentials for Work syllabus
RegistrationRegister for Nucamp AI Essentials for Work

Table of Contents

  • Administrative automation: cutting back-office costs in New Zealand
  • Clinical decision support and diagnostics in New Zealand
  • Improving patient access and contact centres across New Zealand
  • End-to-end workflow and referral automation in New Zealand healthcare
  • Resource optimisation and inventory management in New Zealand
  • Workforce impacts and redeployment in New Zealand
  • Policy, funding and adoption models in New Zealand
  • Barriers and risk management for AI in New Zealand healthcare
  • Case studies and measurable outcomes from New Zealand pilots
  • Practical steps for New Zealand healthcare leaders starting with AI
  • Conclusion: The future of AI in New Zealand healthcare
  • Frequently Asked Questions

Check out next:

Administrative automation: cutting back-office costs in New Zealand

(Up)

Administrative automation is where New Zealand health services can shave real costs without cutting care: AI-driven booking, coding and document workflows turn repetitive chores into quiet background processes so staff can focus on exceptions that need human judgement.

Vendors in Aotearoa are already pitching practical wins - from smarter appointment scheduling that reduces waitlists and no-shows to automated electronic referrals that speed inter-provider handoffs - and local case work highlights gains in accuracy, compliance and reduced burnout.

Quanton showcases automation use cases like electronic referrals, contact-centre automation, administrative coding and medical document processing that directly target back-office overhead, while Canon Business Services maps how workflow automation centralises patient records and cuts manual rework across billing and communications.

For front-line scheduling, AI assistants such as Emitrr offer 24/7 booking, real-time reschedules and reminder chains that keep diaries full and cut costly gaps; imagine a reception team freed from an inbox that used to swallow their whole morning.

The result: leaner admin budgets, better data quality and faster patient journeys across New Zealand's health networks.

Administrative functionBenefit
Appointment scheduling (Emitrr AI appointment scheduling solution for healthcare)24/7 bookings, fewer no-shows, real-time rescheduling
Electronic referrals (Quanton electronic referral solutions for New Zealand healthcare)Faster coordination between providers, reduced delays
Administrative coding & billing (Quanton administrative coding and billing automation for healthcare)Improved accuracy and streamlined revenue processes
Document & records automation (Canon Business Services healthcare workflow and patient records automation)Centralised patient records, fewer errors, better compliance

Fill this form to download the Bootcamp Syllabus

And learn about Nucamp's Bootcamps and why aspiring developers choose us.

Clinical decision support and diagnostics in New Zealand

(Up)

Clinical decision support and diagnostics in New Zealand are moving from promise to practice as AI becomes a practical second pair of eyes for busy radiologists: local professional guidance from the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists (RANZCR AI guidance) emphasises clinical standards, ethics and a human‑in‑the‑loop approach, while vendors are rolling out tools that speed reads and triage urgent cases.

Partnerships bringing AZmed's Rayvolve AI Suite to Australia and New Zealand aim to automate chest and trauma detection - flagging issues such as subtle lung changes or fingernail‑thin rib fractures and surfacing those studies to the top of a radiologist's list - while enterprise platforms like Aidoc enterprise prioritisation promise integrated prioritisation across hospital workflows.

The multi‑society practical guidance on developing, purchasing and monitoring AI tools reinforces the need for rigorous evaluation, ongoing performance checks and close clinician–developer collaboration so efficiency gains don't outpace safety.

These steps make it realistic that diagnostic AI in NZ will cut wait times and lift accuracy, but only where standards, training and oversight keep humans squarely in charge.

“AI tools are an essential part of radiology's future,” said RSNA President Curtis P. Langlotz, MD, PhD.

Improving patient access and contact centres across New Zealand

(Up)

Improving patient access across Aotearoa means bringing the contact centre into the heart of care: AI can deliver 24/7 intelligent virtual assistants, predictive call routing and omnichannel handoffs so a caller at 2am gets triage and a booked follow‑up instead of an endless hold tone, but New Zealand leaders warn this must enhance - not replace - human care.

The Contact Centres Industry Action Plan 2024 stresses avoiding robotic voices and basic chatbots that alienate customers and instead building systems that lift agent capability and preserve empathy (Contact Centres Industry Action Plan 2024 - New Zealand contact centre guidance).

Local industry groups note AI should be a partner to staff, not a straight swap: agents gain real‑time prompts and quality assurance while retaining the empathetic judgement AI lacks (CCNNZ guidance on AI and empathy in contact centres).

Designing an AI‑centric contact centre with high‑quality, bidirectional data flows and assistive guidance can shrink training time, reduce waitlists and make patient journeys smoother - turning every interaction into a quicker, kinder pathway to care (Designing a truly AI‑centric contact centre - Digital Island).

Fill this form to download the Bootcamp Syllabus

And learn about Nucamp's Bootcamps and why aspiring developers choose us.

End-to-end workflow and referral automation in New Zealand healthcare

(Up)

End-to-end workflow and referral automation is stitching primary care, specialists and patients together across Aotearoa: Health New Zealand's e‑referral work in Waitemata, Counties Manukau and Auckland lets clinicians send referrals electronically, while mature, clinician‑codesigned platforms like ERMS electronic referral platform provide proven end‑to‑end capability (ERMS even marked its 5 millionth referral), cutting lost paperwork and speeding triage; at the same time Webtools' Centrik patient portals now surface Cervin's SR Referrals so patients can see referral documents and status in the same app, reducing follow‑up queries and handoffs.

Configurable solutions such as HealthLink Referral Manager configurable referral management system add triage and tracking, and automation patterns described by industry providers and analysts show how quicker referral routing and automated letters can shave wait times and free clinicians to focus on complex care rather than admin.

The practical payoff is tangible: fewer phone‑tag loops, clearer queues for specialists, and a patient who can watch their referral travel from GP to specialist in real time - turning a once‑mysterious process into a visible, accountable journey.

SystemHighlight
ERMSClinician codesigned end‑to‑end referrals; celebrated 5 million referrals
SR Referrals (Cervin) via CentrikOver 2 million referrals processed; integrated into patient portals for visibility
Health New Zealand e‑referralsElectronic referrals implemented in Waitemata, Counties Manukau and Auckland
HealthLink Referral ManagerConfigurable referral management and triage

"It handles the mechanics of taking notes, but it never replaces the essential human elements of care: empathy, experience, and nuance."

Resource optimisation and inventory management in New Zealand

(Up)

Resource optimisation and inventory management are becoming concrete levers for cost reduction across Aotearoa's hospitals: the New Zealand inventory analytics market is growing (valued at about USD 20 million) as AI forecasting, cloud platforms and real‑time tracking give supply teams sharper sightlines into stock levels and demand, so a ward no longer needs to keep costly buffer piles “just in case.” Health logistics research from the University of Auckland highlights how predictive models can time vaccine orders, protect cold‑chain capacity and link lab demand to EHRs, while practical guidance on hospital systems shows that as much as 20% of budgets go on pharmaceuticals and supplies - so smarter replenishment really matters.

Practical tech - RFID, IoT sensors and automated reorder rules - cuts expiries and urgent restocking, shortens lead times for remote sites and turns inventory from a hidden cost into an efficiency centre.

For New Zealand health leaders, the payoff is simple: fewer stockouts, less waste and more predictable budgets that free clinicians to focus on care rather than scavenging for supplies.

MetricWhat the research says
Market sizeNew Zealand inventory management analytics market report (USD 20M)
Key technologiesAI forecasting, cloud platforms, RFID/IoT and automated replenishment (Hospital inventory management best practices (NetSuite))
Research & benefitsUniversity of Auckland health logistics research on vaccine forecasting and cold chain - better vaccine forecasting, optimized cold chain, reduced waste

Fill this form to download the Bootcamp Syllabus

And learn about Nucamp's Bootcamps and why aspiring developers choose us.

Workforce impacts and redeployment in New Zealand

(Up)

AI is reshaping New Zealand's health workforce by shifting time from paperwork back into patient care and smart redeployment, but it also raises real risks that demand policy and training.

Studies and pilots show clinicians can reclaim 30 minutes to two hours a day using AI scribes and co‑pilots - time that, when scaled, can let a specialist see two or three extra patients a day and meaningfully dent waitlists (see Medow Health's co‑pilot results and uptake in NZ and Australia).

At the same time, data projects like East Health Trust's move to the Snowflake AI Data Cloud free analysts from slow data wrangling so teams can focus on population health and workforce development rather than nightly ETL jobs.

That practical rebalancing creates roles for clinical reviewers, AI auditors and exception‑handling specialists - turning threatened admin jobs into higher‑value positions - provided there's central guidance on consent, safety and training so younger clinicians don't lose critical thinking.

The clearest “so what?”: instead of paper chasing, teams can spend evenings on skill development or patient outreach, not paperwork, but only if governance and upskilling keep pace with deployment.

MetricWhat the research shows
Time saved per clinician30 minutes to 2 hours/day (University of Otago survey via RNZ)
Specialist consultations using AIMedow Health used in ~250,000 consultations across NZ & Australia (ITBrief)
Data processing improvementEast Health Trust: from most of a day to 1 hour (Snowflake case study)
GP clinics connected19 GP clinics feeding East Health Trust analytics (Snowflake)

“AI comes with the risk that younger doctors will not develop their critical‑thinking skills.”

Policy, funding and adoption models in New Zealand

(Up)

Policy, funding and adoption models in New Zealand are moving from patchy signals to a deliberate, supportive framework designed to give health services confidence to invest in AI: the Government's first national AI Strategy (published in July 2025) and the accompanying Responsible AI Guidance promote a light‑touch, risk‑based approach aligned with the OECD AI Principles and lean on existing laws (privacy, consumer protection, human rights) rather than a new AI Act; read the New Zealand Government AI Strategy - Beehive press release via the New Zealand Government AI Strategy - Beehive press release and the practical breakdown from DLA Piper analysis of New Zealand's AI Strategy.

The Strategy explicitly favours swift uptake of proven tools over building large national models, links to incentives like the 15% RDTI tax credit (NZD611M in AI‑related RDTI spend since 2019), and targets barriers such as skills gaps and regulatory uncertainty; the guidance even underlines why human oversight matters after an AI‑assisted draft mistakenly cited the wrong Commerce Act - a vivid reminder that governance, training and proportionate oversight must accompany any funding or procurement choices in health.

“AI could add $76 billion to our GDP by 2038, but we're falling behind other small, advanced economies on AI‑readiness and many businesses are still not planning for the technology,” says Dr Reti.

Barriers and risk management for AI in New Zealand healthcare

(Up)

Barriers to safe, cost‑saving AI in New Zealand healthcare are practical as well as ethical: data quality, re‑identification risks and bias can quietly erode trust unless projects follow the National Ethics Advisory Committee's health data standards (see NEAC on health data and new technologies), while skills gaps and unclear accountability slow adoption - which is why the Government's new AI Strategy and Responsible AI Guidance stress a light‑touch, risk‑based pathway to build confidence (see DLA Piper's breakdown).

Local governance work like the Waitematā AI Governance Group shows practical templates for clinician‑led oversight, and professional bodies such as RANZCR demand human‑in‑the‑loop designs, clear audits and training before clinical deployment.

Concrete risk management means classifying an AI's intended use (diagnose, drive or inform care), auditing performance in real‑world settings, consulting Māori as partners, and documenting who is accountable at each AI lifecycle step - measures that turn vague tech risk into manageable clinical practice.

One vivid reminder: a government AI draft once cited the wrong Commerce Act, a small error that underlines why human oversight and plain‑language transparency are non‑negotiable.

ConditionRisk category (NEAC Table 13.1)
CriticalIV / III / II
SeriousIII / II / I
Non‑seriousII / I / I

“To businesses considering AI adoption: the Government stands ready to support your journey through guidance and stable policy settings that reward innovation.”

Case studies and measurable outcomes from New Zealand pilots

(Up)

New Zealand pilots led by Wellington‑based Volpara are delivering practical, measurable wins: the company celebrated its 300th peer‑reviewed paper, with studies showing density‑based ordering can cut radiologist reading time and lift specificity (from 86% to 89%), while NZ clinics such as Mercy/Allevia report faster, objective breast‑density assessments that help decide who needs supplementary imaging Volpara Health 300 peer‑reviewed papers and local adopters note quicker decisions and better image quality for dense breasts Allevia Radiology on Volpara image quality for dense breasts.

Awarded research on Volpara's TruPGMI image‑quality scoring shows AI can cut technical repeats and lift positioning standards, and a real‑world deployment reported quality‑assurance time falling from hours to minutes - an unmistakable “so what?” that frees technologists for training or more patient contact.

Collectively, these case studies point to fewer repeats, clearer triage, and scalable efficiency gains across Aotearoa's breast imaging services.

MetricValue / Outcome
Peer‑reviewed studies300 published papers
Clinical reachUsed in thousands of facilities; impacts millions of patients
Reading specificityImproved from 86% to 89% in density‑ordered reads
QA timeReduced from hours to minutes in a reported deployment

“Reaching 300 studies reflects the deep trust our technology has earned within both the academic and clinical communities.”

Practical steps for New Zealand healthcare leaders starting with AI

(Up)

Start small, measure fast and lead with clinicians: New Zealand health leaders should pick one high‑impact, low‑risk use case (AI scribes for notes, electronic referrals or contact‑centre assists), run a short clinician‑led pilot, lock down data and privacy rules, train staff and measure time saved before scaling - practical blueprints live in the market, from ambient scribes like Heidi Health ambient clinical scribe to automation playbooks for referrals and contact centres from Quanton healthcare referrals & contact-centre automation.

Pair those pilots with clear organisational rules on what data can be used and how (see NZ‑focused guidance from Workday), invest in templates and clinician customisation so outputs match local workflows, then track hard outcomes: minutes reclaimed per consultation, fewer admin hours and the “so what?” - specialists gaining time to see two or three extra patients a day or having a lay‑person follow‑up letter ready by the time a patient reaches reception.

Treat governance and staff capability as first‑class workstreams so gains in productivity translate into safer, more humane care and measurable cost savings.

Practical stepAction
Choose a pilotStart with AI scribes, electronic referrals or contact‑centre automation (Heidi, Quanton)
Data & policyDefine acceptable data, privacy controls and usage guidelines (Workday NZ guidance)
Measure & scaleTrack time‑saved, patient throughput and clinician adoption before wider rollout

“It handles the mechanics of taking notes, but it never replaces the essential human elements of care: empathy, experience, and nuance.”

Conclusion: The future of AI in New Zealand healthcare

(Up)

The future of AI in Aotearoa's health system looks practical and incremental: clinicians and primary‑care teams are already experimenting, with a recent GPNZ primary care AI survey results showing more than half of respondents have used AI and identifying notetaking, inbox management and routine admin automation as the highest‑value starting points - changes that free up time for human contact so patients actually notice more eye contact in consultations.

Pilots and deployments point to real wins for productivity and shorter waits (see the ITBrief report on AI productivity and reduced wait times in New Zealand healthcare), but the path to scale will depend on trust: clear governance, strong validation and plain‑language regulation remain prerequisites, as legal and sector analysis has warned.

Practical upskilling is part of the solution - targeted training such as the Nucamp AI Essentials for Work syllabus and course details can help teams run safe pilots, write better prompts and measure real time savings - turning cautious curiosity into accountable, measurable improvement without losing the human judgement that matters most.

MetricResearch finding
Survey responsesOver 300 primary care responses (GPNZ)
AdoptionMore than half of respondents have used AI
Common applicationsNotetaking, inbox management, non‑clinical admin tasks

“It handles the mechanics of taking notes, but it never replaces the essential human elements of care: empathy, experience, and nuance.”

Frequently Asked Questions

(Up)

How is AI helping healthcare companies in New Zealand cut costs and improve efficiency?

AI is reducing costs and improving efficiency across administrative automation, clinical decision support, patient access/contact centres, end‑to‑end referral workflows, inventory management and workforce redeployment. Practical wins include 24/7 appointment booking and fewer no‑shows, faster electronic referrals and triage, automated coding and document processing that shrink back‑office overhead, predictive inventory to cut waste and stockouts, and AI scribes/co‑pilots that reclaim 30 minutes to two hours per clinician per day. NZ pilots and vendors (for example ERMS, Volpara, Centrik, Quanton, Emitrr) report measurable outcomes such as faster triage, fewer technical repeats, improved reading specificity (e.g. Volpara density‑ordered reads from ~86% to ~89%), ERMS reaching millions of referrals, and real reductions in QA time from hours to minutes.

Which administrative and workflow tasks are being automated and what are the concrete benefits?

Common automated tasks are appointment scheduling (24/7 booking, real‑time reschedules, fewer no‑shows), electronic referrals (faster coordination, reduced delays), administrative coding and billing (improved accuracy and revenue processes), and document/records automation (centralised records, fewer errors, better compliance). Vendors and local projects show benefits including reduced manual rework, improved data quality, shorter patient journeys, lower admin budgets and less staff burnout. Examples in Aotearoa include ERMS clinician‑codesigned referral platforms and SR Referrals surfaced in patient portals for visibility, which together have processed millions of referrals and reduced phone‑tag and follow‑up queries.

Can AI be used safely for diagnostics in New Zealand and what safeguards are required?

Yes - when deployed with robust safeguards. Clinical decision support and diagnostic AI should operate with a human‑in‑the‑loop, clear clinical standards, ongoing performance monitoring, clinician–developer collaboration, and audited validation in real‑world settings. Professional guidance (for example from radiology colleges) stresses ethics, human oversight and documented accountability. Risk management also requires classifying intended use (inform, assist, or decide), bias and re‑identification checks, Māori consultation, and explicit liability and governance arrangements so efficiency gains do not outpace patient safety.

How does AI affect the healthcare workforce and what training or governance is needed?

AI can free clinicians from repetitive admin - studies and pilots report 30 minutes to two hours saved per clinician per day, enabling more consultations and higher‑value work - but it also changes roles and requires upskilling. Health services should invest in targeted training (practical AI skills, prompt design, deployment risk management), create clinician‑led governance structures, define consent and privacy controls, and develop new roles such as AI auditors and exception handlers. Without training and oversight there are risks to clinical decision‑making and professional development, so workforce planning must pair technology deployment with capability building.

What practical first steps should New Zealand health leaders take to run safe, cost‑saving AI pilots?

Start small and clinician‑led: pick a high‑impact, low‑risk use case (for example AI scribes, electronic referrals or contact‑centre assists), run a short pilot, lock down data and privacy rules, measure time saved and clinical outcomes, and only scale after validation. Accompany pilots with clear governance (who is accountable at each lifecycle step), local stakeholder and Māori engagement, regular audits, and staff training. Use existing public guidance (national AI strategy and responsible AI guidance), track hard metrics (minutes reclaimed per consultation, reduced admin hours, fewer repeats or waitlist reductions) and prioritise human oversight so productivity gains translate into safer, more equitable care.

You may be interested in the following topics as well:

N

Ludo Fourrage

Founder and CEO

Ludovic (Ludo) Fourrage is an education industry veteran, named in 2017 as a Learning Technology Leader by Training Magazine. Before founding Nucamp, Ludo spent 18 years at Microsoft where he led innovation in the learning space. As the Senior Director of Digital Learning at this same company, Ludo led the development of the first of its kind 'YouTube for the Enterprise'. More recently, he delivered one of the most successful Corporate MOOC programs in partnership with top business schools and consulting organizations, i.e. INSEAD, Wharton, London Business School, and Accenture, to name a few. ​With the belief that the right education for everyone is an achievable goal, Ludo leads the nucamp team in the quest to make quality education accessible