Top 5 Jobs in Government That Are Most at Risk from AI in Milwaukee - And How to Adapt
Last Updated: August 22nd 2025

Too Long; Didn't Read:
Milwaukee's top 5 at‑risk public‑sector jobs: 911 telecommunicators, 311/transit reps, permitting clerks, translators, and records/data clerks. AI pilots cite >25 minutes saved/day, potential 10–20% headcount impact for dispatch, and Milwaukee's $50M budget gap by 2026 - pair pilots with reskilling.
Milwaukee's public sector should pay close attention to AI because local investment and experiments are accelerating adoption while budget pressure raises the odds of automation: Microsoft's AI Co‑Innovation Lab in Milwaukee has already helped more than 10 Wisconsin companies and aims to assist 270 businesses as part of a $3.3 billion regional investment, signaling growing local capacity for AI solutions (Microsoft AI Co‑Innovation Lab in Milwaukee: regional AI investment and business impact); nearby, an AI-driven review produced a 70‑page set of proposals to address Milwaukee County's budget gap - projected near $50 million by 2026 - showing how AI can surface options fast but also miss political and equity tradeoffs (Milwaukee County AI budget experiment report and analysis).
With agentic AI poised to automate routine workflows across counties, upskilling is essential; Nucamp's 15‑week AI Essentials for Work bootcamp offers practical, job-focused training to help municipal staff use AI responsibly and protect career options (AI Essentials for Work bootcamp syllabus and course details).
Program | Length | Early Bird Cost | Registration |
---|---|---|---|
AI Essentials for Work | 15 Weeks | $3,582 | Register for the AI Essentials for Work bootcamp |
“Budgeting isn't just an intellectual exercise. It's also a value‑laden exercise. You can't fix the numbers without facing what the community wants or what's mandated by state law.” - Rob Henken
Table of Contents
- Methodology: How we chose the Top 5 and adapted national data to Milwaukee
- Public Safety Telecommunicators (911 dispatchers) - Why they're at risk
- Customer Service Representatives (311 and transit customer service) - Automation and chatbots
- Administrative Clerks and Ticket Agents (permitting counters, parking enforcement clerks) - Online self-service trends
- Translators and Language Access Specialists (milwaukee language access program) - Machine translation pressures
- Records and Statistical Assistants (records clerks, data entry at Milwaukee County) - Automation of routine data work
- Conclusion: Concrete next steps for Milwaukee workers and agencies
- Frequently Asked Questions
Check out next:
Explore high-impact practical government AI use cases such as predictive maintenance and procurement automation tailored to Milwaukee.
Methodology: How we chose the Top 5 and adapted national data to Milwaukee
(Up)To identify the Top 5 Milwaukee roles at risk and adapt national findings to local practice, the analysis began by mapping task-level evidence from large public‑sector Copilot experiments to comparable Milwaukee job functions (contact center scripts, records entry flows, permitting checklists), then tested those mappings against Microsoft's public‑sector skilling and implementation guidance to form realistic rollout scenarios; primary anchors were the UK Government's three‑month Copilot experiment and Microsoft's WorkLab write‑up of the 20,000‑user pilot, which together supply measured signals - adoption timelines, average time‑savings, and uptake behaviors - that inform conservative exposure estimates and prioritize training needs (UK Government Copilot experiment report, Microsoft WorkLab 20,000‑user Copilot study).
A single memorable calibration: the pilot's reported savings of more than 25 minutes per user per day was used as a planning benchmark to set training cadence and pilot size for Milwaukee agencies.
Metric | Value |
---|---|
Participants | 20,000 |
Duration | 3 months |
Reported time saved | >25 minutes/day (average) |
% reporting less time on routine tasks | >70% |
% positive sentiment (wouldn't give up) | >80% |
Departments continuing | 9 of 12 (expanded to 31,000 seats) |
Public Safety Telecommunicators (911 dispatchers) - Why they're at risk
(Up)Milwaukee's 911 telecommunicators sit at a high-risk intersection for automation because the role combines heavy, repeatable data work (typing into CAD, logging locations, standard triage scripts) with ongoing staffing stress that invites technological fixes: the MPD call center funnels more than one million 911 calls each year handled by roughly two dozen MPD employees while the department reports about two dozen vacancies across 137 positions, and the city is investing in a new Computer‑Aided Dispatch and a phased merger into a unified Department of Emergency Communications - changes that make routine call‑routing and form‑based tasks easier to automate (Inside Milwaukee's 911 Center reporting on call volume and operations).
At the same time, recruitment materials show the job is deliberately standardized - typing, CAD entry, map reading, and scripted pre‑arrival instructions are core functions - so modest AI assistance could cut repetitive time but also reduce entry‑level job openings unless upskilling is paired with workforce planning (911 Telecommunicator recruitment and pay details); the practical “so what?”: when a two‑dozen person team is expected to absorb a million calls, even a 10–20% automation of routine logging and routing materially changes headcount needs and shift planning, so training and role redesign should start now.
Metric | Value |
---|---|
911 calls handled (city) | >1,000,000 / year |
MPD call‑takers | Approximately two dozen |
Vacancies | ~Two dozen across 137 positions |
Recent starting pay (city update) | $55,760.90 (post 26% increase) |
Recruitment listed starting rate (2024) | $59,753.95 (resident) |
“There are massive investments in technology that are about to go live.” - Fire Chief Aaron Lipski
Customer Service Representatives (311 and transit customer service) - Automation and chatbots
(Up)Milwaukee 311 and transit customer‑service reps face growing pressure from chatbots and self‑service portals already common in the private sector: Sun Life's provider site routes routine eligibility and claims checks to an online portal and a Client Services line that operates 7 a.m.–5:30 p.m.
CT (Sun Life provider FAQs and self-service options for eligibility and claims), while companies such as Otis advertise 24/7 automated support and a single toll‑free expert line - models that show how simple triage and status checks move off live agents (Otis 24/7 automated support and Milwaukee office contact information).
For Milwaukee agencies, the practical takeaway is concrete: adopt conversational AI for predictable inquiries (fare status, route changes, permit lookup) and pair that rollout with targeted reskilling so staff handle the higher‑value, hard‑to‑automate cases; Nucamp's local use‑case guides and skilling pathways offer ready examples for pilot design and ROI tracking (Nucamp AI Essentials for Work syllabus and skilling pathways for applied AI at work).
The so‑what: shifting routine first‑contact tasks to chatbots can shorten hold times and preserve human capacity for complex, equity‑sensitive work - if training and clear escalation paths are required from day one.
Example | Contact / Hours |
---|---|
Sun Life Client Services | 800-442-7742 - 7 a.m.–5:30 p.m. CT |
Otis 24/7 Support (Milwaukee office) | 800-233-6847 - Milwaukee: (262) 240-3400 |
Administrative Clerks and Ticket Agents (permitting counters, parking enforcement clerks) - Online self-service trends
(Up)Permitting counters and ticket agents face clear, near-term exposure as more Wisconsin transactions move online: the process to register for crucial permits - business licenses, mobile food facility permits, public health permits, seller's permits, and employee food‑handler cards - now supports online applications (the SBA License & Permits portal is listed as the registration route), meaning routine, repeatable counter tasks can be completed without a clerk (Wisconsin food truck licenses and permits - SBA online registration); specific, memorable detail: a Food Handler (employee health) card typically costs under $15, so low fees remove a friction point that historically kept applicants visiting counters.
The practical consequence is fewer simple transactions and more exception processing - misfiled applications, zoning conflicts, or fee disputes - so agencies should redesign front‑line roles toward digital intake oversight, compliance reviews, and citizen assistance while pairing any portal rollout with targeted reskilling and local pilot metrics (see Nucamp's applied‑AI and workforce training guidance for municipal contexts) (Nucamp AI Essentials for Work applied AI municipal workforce training guide).
Permit | Notes / Typical Cost |
---|---|
Business License | Varies by county; required per jurisdiction |
Mobile Food Facility Permit | Varies by county; ensures on‑truck safety |
Public Health Permit | Typical range ~$100–$1,000+ depending on risk |
Seller's Permit | Apply online via SBA portal; no application fee (security deposit possible) |
Employee Food Handler Card | Usually ≤ $15 per employee |
Translators and Language Access Specialists (milwaukee language access program) - Machine translation pressures
(Up)Translators and language‑access specialists in Milwaukee face a two‑front pressure: inexpensive machine translation and chatbots that can handle routine written material, and an acute local shortage of certified interpreters for courts, healthcare, and social services that machine systems can't legally or ethically replace.
Wisconsin courts billed more than 26,200 interpretation hours in 2023 - a 27% rise over five years - and Milwaukee County alone spent about $905,888 on court interpreter fees while raising county interpreter pay from $50 to $65/hr, underscoring real demand and cost pressure (Wisconsin courts interpreter shortage and demand report).
Local reviews show access remains inconsistent across healthcare and public services, so agencies deploying machine translation should pair it with clear rules (when MT is acceptable), robust escalation paths to human interpreters, and investment in local pipelines and training - leveraging state guidelines and tools like the Department of Children and Families' translation resources and “I Speak” materials to meet legal obligations (Wisconsin state translation and interpretation requirements and resources) and community partners who fill gaps (Milwaukee language access challenges and community solutions).
The so‑what: automating routine text can cut paperwork, but with only a handful of new certified interpreters statewide last year, agencies that replace people without building capacity will worsen delays and legal risk.
Metric | Value |
---|---|
Court interpretation hours (2023) | 26,200+ (2023) |
Five‑year increase | 27% |
Fully certified interpreters in WI (last year) | 4 |
Milwaukee County interpreter spend | $905,888 (recent year) |
Milwaukee County pay (recent change) | $50 → $65 per hour |
“We cannot guarantee a qualified interpreter for every hearing as the hearing is scheduled. The need outweighs the supply that we have.” - Milwaukee County Judge Carolina Maria Stark
“Justice delayed is justice denied.” - Judge Stark
Records and Statistical Assistants (records clerks, data entry at Milwaukee County) - Automation of routine data work
(Up)Records and statistical assistants - records clerks and data‑entry staff across Milwaukee County - face high exposure because much of their daily work is structured, repeatable, and already addressable by automation: modern RPA with OCR can capture forms, apply field validation, and run deduplication so human time shifts from keystrokes to exception review (see Flobotics' practical guide to data‑entry automation and ROI Data Entry Automation Guide (Flobotics)).
The bigger payoff is upstream: cleaning naming conventions and building a simple data inventory prevents the bloat that turns automation into a band‑aid - Milwaukee Tool's One‑Key playbook shows standard identifiers and consistent conventions drastically reduce duplicate records and rework (Inventory Data Process - Milwaukee Tool One‑Key).
Local labor signals matter: Robert Half lists a Wisconsin data‑entry opening in Madison at $18.29–$21.18/hr, so automation will change the mix of work not eliminate the need for skilled staff (Data Entry Clerk Job Listing - Robert Half).
The so‑what: even a short pilot that pairs a data inventory, validation rules, and one bot can stop nightly deduplication jobs that now eat overtime - NHS pilots have translated similar automation into thousands of saved staff hours, a concrete savings municipal budgets can reinvest into training and higher‑value analysis.
Example listing | Pay / Detail |
---|---|
Data Entry Clerk - Madison, WI (Robert Half) | $18.29–$21.18 / hr |
“Understanding what important identifiers or fields exist is important,” - Josh Marchok
Conclusion: Concrete next steps for Milwaukee workers and agencies
(Up)Concrete next steps for Milwaukee workers and agencies start with governance, pilots, and skilling done together: first, stand up a cross‑functional AI governance body and a technical “safety” team to review use cases, mirror the GSA playbook for roles/responsibilities and require an AI use‑case inventory before procurement; second, run small, measurable pilots (use the 25‑minute/day Copilot benchmark from national pilots as a planning target) for 311 chatbots, records OCR+RPA, and limited CAD-assist trials, with clear escalation rules to human specialists; third, pair every pilot with a reskilling pathway so staff move from keystrokes to exception handling - use local higher‑ed and practitioner groups for curriculum and ethics guidance, for example UWM's AI task force recommendations on tiers and tool security and MSOE's AI Community of Practice for campus‑to‑agency training collaborations; finally, give frontline workers practical prompt and workflow skills now by enrolling in focused applied courses such as Nucamp's AI Essentials for Work so pilots deliver productivity without creating unemployment risk (UWM AI Task Force guidance for pilots and governance, MSOE AI Community of Practice and governance, Nucamp AI Essentials for Work registration and syllabus).
Takeaway: short, supervised pilots plus mandatory reskilling let Milwaukee cut routine hours while protecting jobs and legal obligations.
Immediate Step | Resource / Next Action |
---|---|
Form AI governance + safety team | Adopt GSA‑style roles and inventory requirements |
Run 3 pilots (311, records OCR, CAD assist) | Use 25‑min/day pilot benchmark; define escalation rules |
Reskill frontline staff | Enroll in applied AI training (e.g., AI Essentials for Work) |
Frequently Asked Questions
(Up)Which government jobs in Milwaukee are most at risk from AI and why?
The analysis identifies five high‑risk public‑sector roles: 1) 911 telecommunicators - routine CAD entry, scripted triage, and high staffing pressure make logging and routing susceptible to automation; 2) Customer service representatives (311 and transit) - conversational AI and chatbots can handle predictable inquiries; 3) Administrative clerks and ticket agents (permits, parking) - online self‑service portals shift simple transactions off counters; 4) Translators and language access specialists - machine translation pressures routine text tasks though certified human interpreters remain legally required for many settings; 5) Records and statistical assistants - RPA+OCR can automate structured data entry, deduplication, and validation. These findings are drawn by mapping large public‑sector Copilot and pilot evidence to Milwaukee job functions and local metrics (call volumes, permit digitization, interpreter hours, staffing and vacancy rates).
How did you determine exposure levels and adapt national pilot data to Milwaukee?
We mapped task‑level evidence from major Copilot and large‑user pilots (UK Government three‑month trial, Microsoft WorkLab 20,000‑user study) to Milwaukee job functions such as contact‑center scripts, permitting checklists, and CAD workflows. Key anchors included reported savings (>25 minutes per user per day), >70% reporting less time on routine tasks, and department continuation rates. Those benchmarks were used to form conservative exposure estimates and realistic rollout scenarios for local agencies, then tested against Microsoft public‑sector skilling guidance and Milwaukee specific metrics (e.g., >1,000,000 annual 911 calls; county interpreter hours and spend).
What practical steps can Milwaukee agencies and workers take to adapt and protect jobs?
Recommended immediate actions: 1) Establish a cross‑functional AI governance body and technical safety team and require an AI use‑case inventory before procurement (mirror GSA playbooks); 2) Run small, measurable pilots (prioritize 311 chatbots, records OCR+RPA, CAD assist) using the >25‑minutes/day Copilot benchmark for planning and define clear escalation to humans; 3) Pair every pilot with targeted reskilling pathways so staff move from keystrokes to exception handling, leveraging local higher‑ed and practitioner groups; 4) Provide frontline prompt and workflow training now (for example enroll staff in applied courses like Nucamp's AI Essentials for Work). These tactics aim to capture productivity gains while minimizing headcount disruption and legal/equity risks.
How should agencies handle language access and interpreter shortages when using machine translation?
Machine translation can reduce routine text workloads, but agencies must set clear rules about when MT is acceptable, require robust escalation paths to certified human interpreters for courts, healthcare, or legally sensitive cases, and invest in local interpreter pipelines. Milwaukee faces rising demand (26,200+ court interpretation hours in 2023, 27% five‑year increase) and very few new certified interpreters statewide, so replacing people without capacity building risks legal exposure and service delays. Use state guidance (e.g., Department of Children and Families resources), partner with community organizations, and budget for targeted hiring and pay adjustments.
What metrics and pilot design details should Milwaukee agencies use to measure AI impact?
Use conservative, measurable metrics anchored to national pilots: target the >25 minutes/day average time‑saved per user as a planning benchmark; track percent reduction in routine task time, percent of inquiries handled without escalation (for chatbots), error/exception rates post‑automation, headcount or shift‑planning impacts (e.g., 10–20% automation of routine logging can materially change staffing needs), and service equity indicators (response times for vulnerable populations). Run short pilots (3 months), document escalation paths, collect sentiment (wouldn't give up) and continuation rates, and pair pilots with reskilling outcomes to ensure productivity gains translate into safer workforce transitions.
You may be interested in the following topics as well:
Learn why anomaly detection for fraud prevention is cutting manual reviews and saving taxpayer dollars across Wisconsin agencies.
See how Local economic forecasting and policy simulation helps Milwaukee model tax and employment scenarios before implementation.
Ludo Fourrage
Founder and CEO
Ludovic (Ludo) Fourrage is an education industry veteran, named in 2017 as a Learning Technology Leader by Training Magazine. Before founding Nucamp, Ludo spent 18 years at Microsoft where he led innovation in the learning space. As the Senior Director of Digital Learning at this same company, Ludo led the development of the first of its kind 'YouTube for the Enterprise'. More recently, he delivered one of the most successful Corporate MOOC programs in partnership with top business schools and consulting organizations, i.e. INSEAD, Wharton, London Business School, and Accenture, to name a few. With the belief that the right education for everyone is an achievable goal, Ludo leads the nucamp team in the quest to make quality education accessible