The Complete Guide to Using AI in the Financial Services Industry in Belgium in 2025

By Ludo Fourrage

Last Updated: September 4th 2025

AI in Belgian financial services 2025: dashboard showing AI adoption and regulation in Belgium

Too Long; Didn't Read:

Belgium's 2025 financial‑services AI shift: generative AI speeds underwriting, fraud detection and personalised offers, with adoption up 80% YoY. 85% of firms have AI units, >60% validated roadmaps, productivity is 92% priority; top blockers: integration 62%, regulation 38%, data 31%.

Belgium's financial services sector is at a turning point: generative AI promises faster underwriting, fraud detection and personalised offers, but firms must move while balancing measurable ROI and compliance - a theme at PwC's GenAI in Financial Services event that flagged an 80% jump in AI adoption year‑on‑year and stressed governance for scale (PwC Belgium GenAI in Financial Services event report).

Local market guides show the same reality - AI and open finance are front and centre as the National Bank of Belgium (NBB), FSMA and EU rules (including the AI Act) reshape obligations and supervision in Belgium (Belgium fintech 2025 regulatory overview - Chambers and Partners).

For professionals ready to translate strategy into skills, a practical route is a focused course like the 15‑week AI Essentials for Work syllabus (Nucamp), which teaches prompt design and real‑world AI use across business functions so teams can deploy responsibly and competitively.

“from experimentation to execution”

AttributeInformation
ProgramAI Essentials for Work
Length15 Weeks
CoursesAI at Work: Foundations; Writing AI Prompts; Job Based Practical AI Skills
Cost (early bird / regular)$3,582 / $3,942
RegistrationRegister for AI Essentials for Work (Nucamp)

Table of Contents

  • What is the future of AI in financial services in Belgium (2025)?
  • What is the AI strategy in Belgium: adoption and organization
  • What is the AI regulation in Belgium: EU and national landscape
  • What is the AI industry outlook for 2025 in Belgium
  • Top AI use cases for Belgian financial institutions in 2025
  • Data, governance and ethical controls for AI in Belgium
  • Implementation roadmap: from pilot to production in Belgium
  • Challenges, risks and compliance for Belgian financial services using AI
  • Conclusion & next steps for beginners adopting AI in Belgium
  • Frequently Asked Questions

Check out next:

What is the future of AI in financial services in Belgium (2025)?

(Up)

In 2025 Belgium's financial sector looks set to move from cautious experiments to scaled, governed AI that augments advisers, tightens fraud defences and squeezes cost out of back‑office workflows: local dialogue at the Belgian Financial Forum highlighted workforce and legal implications for banks and insurers (Belgian Financial Forum: The Impact of Artificial Intelligence in Banking), while EY Belgium outlines how private banks will use AI to automate mundane RM tasks and deliver real‑time, personalised client insights without eroding trust (EY Belgium: Leveraging AI for Growth and Cost Efficiency in Private Banking).

At the same time global trend reports warn of a 2025 battleground of fraud, model governance and data modernisation: expect sharper investment in cloud, explainable models, liveness checks and database migration so Belgian firms can both deploy generative AI and satisfy supervisors - a vivid image to remember is branches where AI handles the paperwork while human advisers handle the handshakes.

The net effect for Belgium: smarter, faster client journeys and leaner operations, but only for organisations that pair applied AI with rigorous governance, clear data foundations and regulatory-readiness.

“The Digital Industrial Age of Fraud has dawned, fueled by a perfect storm of social, economic and technological factors that have made fraud more common – and easier to commit – than ever.”

Fill this form to download the Bootcamp Syllabus

And learn about Nucamp's Bootcamps and why aspiring developers choose us.

What is the AI strategy in Belgium: adoption and organization

(Up)

Belgium's AI strategy in 2025 is a pragmatic blend of open innovation and a service‑oriented rollout: firms overwhelmingly favour startup partnerships (90% say collaboration is important) even while just 41% rank AI integration as a top priority, so adoption is strong but uneven across organisations; two striking datapoints from a recent study are that 67% of Belgian companies are exploring diagnostic AI projects and that over half are either running or planning generative AI initiatives, which a Google‑commissioned estimate says could add up to €50 billion to the economy over the next decade - details that make Brussels a busy marketplace for AI strategy work and execution.

That marketplace feeds on both global advisory teams and local specialists: established strategy and M&A support from firms such as EY complements hands‑on delivery from Belgian consultancies and developers (see the round‑up of top AI consultancies in Brussels), while PwC and Deloitte resources help translate pilots into operational scale.

The practical takeaway for financial institutions is clear: pair open‑innovation partnerships with a disciplined strategy and vendor mix - strategy consulting for roadmaps, local AI teams for prototypes, and operations partners for deployment - so projects move from promising experiments to regulated, production‑ready services.

“The concept of open innovation isn't new. But the urgency to adopt it, especially in the age of AI, is imperative. Forward-thinking organizations recognize its potential, and as such it is now the norm rather than the exception.” - Hans Cromphout, Sopra Steria (Brussels)

What is the AI regulation in Belgium: EU and national landscape

(Up)

Belgium's AI regulatory landscape is now governed largely by the EU's risk‑based AI Act, a phased rulebook that bans certain practices and makes AI literacy and transparency concrete obligations (the Act entered into force in August 2024, prohibitions and AI‑literacy duties took effect on 2 February 2025, GPAI governance obligations landed on 2 August 2025, and the wider regime becomes generally applicable in 2026) - see the EU's explanation of the EU AI Act risk-based framework, requirements and timeline.

For Belgian financial firms this means reclassifying tools (are they limited‑risk chatbots, GPAI used across services, or potentially high‑risk credit or recruitment systems?), building demonstrable AI literacy programmes, and preparing for tighter transparency, logging and governance as national supervisors come online: Member States had to designate competent authorities by 2 August 2025 and publish contact points for market surveillance and notifying authorities.

Belgium's national rollout has been closely watched - official listings show Belgian representation by the Federal Public Service Economy and Agence du Numérique, but implementation choices were flagged as “unclear” in public trackers, and Belgium even opposed the Commission's voluntary GPAI Code of Practice at EU board level, underscoring unresolved tensions over copyright, compensation and legal clarity.

Think of the August deadlines as a referee whistle: compliance processes, clear documentation and named regulators must be ready or firms face enforcement in a landscape that now balances safety, rights and competitive innovation.

MilestoneDate / Belgian status
Act entry into force1 Aug 2024
Prohibitions & AI literacy effective2 Feb 2025
GPAI governance obligations & member state authorities due2 Aug 2025
General applicability (high‑risk rules)2 Aug 2026
Belgium national implementation status (tracking)Listed as “Unclear”; FPS Economy & Agence du Numérique represented Belgium; list of 26 bodies published

“This is not the end of the process.”

Fill this form to download the Bootcamp Syllabus

And learn about Nucamp's Bootcamps and why aspiring developers choose us.

What is the AI industry outlook for 2025 in Belgium

(Up)

The industry outlook for AI in Belgium in 2025 is unmistakably pragmatic: projects are shifting from pilots to measurable business value as banks and insurers - names such as BNP Paribas Fortis, KBC, Belfius and Ethias - move AI into core strategy, staffing dedicated units and codifying roadmaps; the 2025 Belgian AI Barometer reports 85% of institutions now have an AI competence centre and over 60% a validated roadmap, while generative AI is already widely used for chatbots and developer assistance, and productivity sits top of the priority list at 92% (see the full FinTech Belgium Barometer).

That transition plays out against a fertile local ecosystem - Belgium remains attractive for fintech growth and partnership-driven innovation per the national fintech review - so expect stronger vendor partnerships, more cloud and data modernisation work, and heavier investment in explainability and governance to meet EU rules.

Practical friction points are clear: system integration complexity (62%), regulatory uncertainty (38%) and data quality (31%) are the main blockers, meaning successful firms will pair technical pilots with enterprise architecture and change programmes; picture a queue‑free branch where a GenAI prepares a personalised mortgage bundle on a tablet in seconds so the human adviser can focus on trust and complex decisions.

In short: measurable ROI and disciplined integration will separate leaders from followers in Belgium's AI race, with ecosystem players, VCs and consultancies ready to help scale promising pilots into regulated production (see the Belgium fintech trends and legal landscape for context).

Metric / Concern2025 Belgium (Barometer)
Institutions with AI unit85%
Validated AI roadmap>60%
Expect break‑even or exceptional ROI in 2025~45%
Priority: Productivity gains92%
GenAI for customer service>60%
AI literacy campaigns85%
Employees given AI assistants77%
Top implementation challenge (integration complexity)62%
Regulatory uncertainty38%
Data quality issues31%

“The changing environment of AI, encompassing traditional AI and the nascent GenAI and agentic AI, will unequivocally reveal which organizations possess superior data and enterprise architecture. This architectural strength will become the decisive competitive advantage for deploying AI services with optimal speed to market.” - Anthony Belpaire, Head of AI, BNP Paribas Fortis

Top AI use cases for Belgian financial institutions in 2025

(Up)

Belgian financial firms in 2025 are focusing on practical AI that delivers measurable value: top use cases include GenAI customer‑service chatbots (over 60% adoption), developer and coding assistance, automated KYC and onboarding workflows that slash processing times, and AI‑augmented underwriting and wholesale‑lending workflows to speed complex decisions - all driven by a productivity and process‑efficiency agenda (productivity was a 92% priority in the 2025 barometer).

Multichannel GenAI agents and retrieval‑augmented chatbots are being used to summarise documents, route tickets and assist advisers so humans handle nuance while AI handles routine work; ING's experiments across customer contact centres, KYC, wholesale banking and marketing highlight this spread of real cases, and practical quality work (like Sailpeak's chatbot assessments) shows the need for RAG, stronger NLU and clear escalation paths to avoid hallucinations.

Adoption is fast but not frictionless: integration complexity and regulatory uncertainty are named blockers, so Belgian teams pair pilots with enterprise architecture and governance to scale safely - see the full 2025 Belgian AI Barometer for the adoption figures and local context, plus case studies of bank chatbot work for implementation cues.

Use caseEvidence / adoption (2025)
GenAI customer service chatbots>60% deployment (FinTech Belgium AI Barometer)
Coding assistance / developer productivityStrong adoption reported in barometer
KYC automation & onboardingActive experiments at ING and across banks
Underwriting & wholesale lending workflowsEfficiency use cases under test to shorten long processes
Document summarisation & agent assist (RAG)Recommended by Sailpeak chatbot assessments

“The changing environment of AI, encompassing traditional AI and the nascent GenAI and agentic AI, will unequivocally reveal which organizations possess superior data and enterprise architecture. This architectural strength will become the decisive competitive advantage for deploying AI services with optimal speed to market.” - Anthony Belpaire, Head of AI, BNP Paribas Fortis

Fill this form to download the Bootcamp Syllabus

And learn about Nucamp's Bootcamps and why aspiring developers choose us.

Data, governance and ethical controls for AI in Belgium

(Up)

Data, governance and ethical controls are now the operating rhythm for Belgian banks and insurers: the EU AI Act's risk categories and the GDPR's privacy rules must be reconciled in practice, not just in theory, so organisations build clear inventories, classify models by risk, and bake privacy‑by‑design into training and deployment pipelines - a point well covered in EY's guidance on the interplay between the AI Act and data management and practical privacy controls (EY guidance on the EU AI Act and data management).

Expect hard governance work: data quality, traceability and documented human oversight are the foundations that stop “black box” systems turning into regulatory liabilities, and EY's checklist for safeguarding privacy highlights common tensions (purpose limitation, data minimisation, automated decision‑making) and pragmatic fixes such as impact assessments, logging and consent models (EY Belgium guide to safeguarding privacy in AI).

Finally, governance cannot lag adoption: Belgian sentiment data and EY surveys show a gap between rapid GenAI rollout and controls, so a realistic roadmap ties model registries, third‑party risk checks and staff AI literacy programmes to compliance gates - think of governance as the safety harness that lets organisations race forward without losing public trust.

MetricBelgium / finding
Belgian employees fearing job losses from AI74% (EY Barometer)
Data privacy & security cited as adoption barrier62% (EY surveys)
Organisations with full Responsible AI protocols~1/3 (only about a third have full protocols)
Executives reporting integrated/scaled AI72% (EY Responsible AI Pulse)

“Consumer concerns about AI responsibility impact brand trust, placing CEOs at the forefront of these discussions. Executives must address these issues by developing responsible strategies to mitigate AI risks and being transparent about their organization's use and protection of AI.” - Raj Sharma, EY Global Managing Partner - Growth and Innovation

Implementation roadmap: from pilot to production in Belgium

(Up)

Move deliberately from pilot to production by following a Belgium‑specific road map that combines short, practical sprints with national support: start with a rapid 3‑day ideation jam and a 6‑week use‑case build to surface high‑impact, low‑friction pilots, then commit to a full 9‑month implementation cycle for production readiness -

“3‑6‑9” approach used by Belgian practitioners speeds decision‑making while protecting budgets

(Belgium AI Index 3‑6‑9 approach).

Pair that cadence with a formal six‑phase playbook - readiness assessment, strategy and KPIs, pilot selection, implementation & testing, scaling and enterprise integration, then continuous monitoring and MLOps - to avoid the common fate of promising PoCs that never scale (Space‑O's 6‑phase AI implementation roadmap).

In Belgium this roadmap should explicitly map regional levers (for example, Flanders' AI action plan and dedicated funding) and public programmes so pilots can tap grants, research partners and innovation sandboxes; the practical payoff is tangible: a compliant, production model that reduces manual work in months rather than years, not just a glossy demo.

For teams that lack specialised staff, bring in delivery partners and use targeted PoC guidance to lock success metrics early and make the jump to regulated, repeatable deployments (BDO: turning ideas into validated PoCs), because in Belgium the right mix of quick wins, regional funding and disciplined governance is what converts pilots into business‑critical systems - imagine a branch where the AI has already prefilled the mortgage dossier and the human adviser focuses on the decision, not the paperwork.

PhaseTypical timelineKey outcome
Ideation3 daysValidated opportunities & shortlist
Use‑case development6 weeksFeasible pilot with success metrics
Implementation~9 monthsProduction‑ready system with testing & integration
Scale & OperateOngoingEnterprise rollout, MLOps and continuous monitoring

Challenges, risks and compliance for Belgian financial services using AI

(Up)

Belgian banks and insurers face a sharply practical set of hurdles as AI moves from pilots into core services: the 2025 FinTech Belgium AI Barometer flags systems integration as the top blocker (62%), with regulatory uncertainty (38%) and data‑quality gaps (31%) close behind, while workforce readiness lags with many staff having limited GenAI experience - a pattern mirrored in EY's analysis that only about 11% of firms are fully prepared for incoming rules and just 25% have established GenAI training programs (see the FinTech Belgium AI Barometer and EY Belgium GenAI adoption review).

These figures translate into real operational risk: firms must reconcile GDPR constraints and customer‑consent limits when reusing transaction data, document human‑in‑the‑loop controls, and be ready to run formal Fundamental Rights Impact Assessments for high‑risk use cases such as credit scoring under the EU AI Act (for legal detail, see Timelex's guide to the AI Act's impact on financial services).

The practical implication for Belgian teams is clear - pair aggressive data cleansing and enterprise architecture work with targeted upskilling, transparent logging and impact assessments so AI delivers productivity without opening regulatory or reputational exposure; picture an adviser freed from paperwork because the model is trusted, explainable and auditable, not one that creates a compliance headache overnight.

Key challenge2025 Belgium
Integration complexity62% (FinTech Belgium AI Barometer)
Regulatory uncertainty38% (FinTech Belgium / EY)
Data quality concerns31% (FinTech Belgium AI Barometer)
Workforce with limited GenAI experience78% (EY Europe survey)
Organisations fully prepared for AI regulation~11% (EY)

“The changing environment of AI, encompassing traditional AI and the nascent GenAI and agentic AI, will unequivocally reveal which organizations possess superior data and enterprise architecture. This architectural strength will become the decisive competitive advantage for deploying AI services with optimal speed to market.” - Anthony Belpaire, Head of AI, BNP Paribas Fortis

Conclusion & next steps for beginners adopting AI in Belgium

(Up)

For beginners in Belgium, the sensible next steps are clear: start with AI literacy, pick a tightly scoped pilot that ties to productivity or cost savings, and lock measurable KPIs before scaling with strong data and governance controls - advice backed by FinTech Belgium's 2025 AI Barometer which shows 85% of institutions now run dedicated AI units and more than 60% have validated roadmaps, while GenAI and productivity sit at the top of the agenda (FinTech Belgium 2025 AI Barometer report); pair that approach with broader monitoring to capture ROI as recommended by the EY European AI Barometer, which highlights Belgium's leading productivity gains and the need for upgraded dashboards and training (EY European AI Barometer 2025 report).

For practical skills, a focused, 15‑week course such as Nucamp's Nucamp AI Essentials for Work syllabus (15‑week course) helps newcomers learn prompt design, workplace use cases and how to run pilots that are compliance‑ready; think small, prove value, harden data pipelines and governance, then scale - this is the path from experiment to enterprise in Belgium's regulated landscape.

MetricBelgium (2025)
Institutions with AI unit85%
Validated AI roadmap>60%
Productivity priority92%
GenAI for customer service>60%
Integration complexity (top blocker)62%
Regulatory uncertainty38%
Data quality concerns31%

“The 2025 AI Barometer paints a clear picture: AI is no longer something futuristic, but a core component of strategic growth for Belgian financial institutions.” - Raf De Kimpe, CEO, FinTech Belgium

Frequently Asked Questions

(Up)

What is the future of AI in Belgium's financial services sector in 2025?

In 2025 Belgium is moving from cautious experiments to scaled, governed AI that augments advisers, tightens fraud detection and automates back‑office workflows. Expect faster underwriting, RAG-powered document summarisation, multichannel GenAI customer agents and greater investment in cloud, explainability and liveness checks. Real benefits require strong data foundations, demonstrable governance and clear KPIs - otherwise pilots will not produce measurable ROI.

How are Belgian financial firms adopting and organising AI, and what are the key adoption figures?

Adoption is strong but uneven: firms favour open innovation and partnerships (90% say collaboration with startups is important). Key datapoints include 67% exploring diagnostic AI projects, over 50% running or planning generative AI initiatives, and a Google-commissioned estimate of up to €50 billion potential economic impact over the next decade. The 2025 barometer shows 85% of institutions have an AI competence centre, >60% a validated roadmap, productivity is the top priority at 92%, and roughly 45% expect break-even or exceptional ROI in 2025.

What regulatory requirements must Belgian financial firms meet for AI in 2025?

Belgium follows the EU risk-based AI Act alongside GDPR. Important AI Act milestones: entry into force 1 Aug 2024; prohibitions & AI‑literacy duties effective 2 Feb 2025; GPAI governance obligations and member state authority designation due 2 Aug 2025; general applicability for high‑risk rules 2 Aug 2026. Firms must classify tools by risk, run impact assessments for high‑risk systems (e.g. credit scoring), build logging and transparency, provide AI literacy programmes, maintain model registries and reconcile GDPR requirements such as purpose limitation and data minimisation.

What are the top use cases, implementation blockers and risk metrics to watch in Belgium?

Top 2025 use cases: GenAI customer-service chatbots (>60% adoption), developer/coding assistance, automated KYC and onboarding, AI-augmented underwriting and RAG-based document summarisation. Primary blockers: integration complexity (62%), regulatory uncertainty (38%) and data quality issues (31%). Workforce readiness is also a concern (78% report limited GenAI experience in surveys) and only about 11% of firms are fully prepared for incoming rules. Data-privacy barriers are cited by ~62%, and only about one-third of organisations report full Responsible AI protocols.

How should teams move from pilot to production in Belgium - practical roadmap and timelines?

Use a staged, measurable approach: a 3‑6‑9 cadence (3‑day ideation, 6‑week use‑case build, ~9‑month implementation to a production‑ready system) combined with a six‑phase playbook: readiness assessment, strategy & KPIs, pilot selection, implementation & testing, scaling & enterprise integration, and continuous monitoring/MLOps. Map regional funding and sandboxes, lock success metrics early, pair pilots with enterprise architecture and governance gates, and use delivery partners for speed where internal skills are limited.

You may be interested in the following topics as well:

N

Ludo Fourrage

Founder and CEO

Ludovic (Ludo) Fourrage is an education industry veteran, named in 2017 as a Learning Technology Leader by Training Magazine. Before founding Nucamp, Ludo spent 18 years at Microsoft where he led innovation in the learning space. As the Senior Director of Digital Learning at this same company, Ludo led the development of the first of its kind 'YouTube for the Enterprise'. More recently, he delivered one of the most successful Corporate MOOC programs in partnership with top business schools and consulting organizations, i.e. INSEAD, Wharton, London Business School, and Accenture, to name a few. ​With the belief that the right education for everyone is an achievable goal, Ludo leads the nucamp team in the quest to make quality education accessible