How AI Is Helping Financial Services Companies in Belgium Cut Costs and Improve Efficiency
Last Updated: September 4th 2025

Too Long; Didn't Read:
Belgian banks and insurers increasingly use AI (IDP, RPA, GenAI) to cut costs and boost efficiency: 85% host an AI unit, >60% have validated roadmaps and GenAI pilots; reported impacts include STP ≥80%, turnaround ↑~42% and cost reductions ~8–38%.
Belgian banks and insurers are moving fast from pilots to measurable value: the 2025 Belgian AI Barometer finds 85% of institutions now host an AI unit, over 60% have validated roadmaps and more than 60% are rolling out GenAI for customer service and coding assistance - so AI is already shifting daily workflows and productivity priorities in Belgium's financial sector (2025 Belgian AI Barometer report - Fintech Belgium).
Regulators and boards are watching closely because the technology brings efficiency gains alongside systemic and operational risks highlighted by the ECB's analysis of AI's benefits and vulnerabilities (ECB analysis of AI benefits and vulnerabilities), while employees call for far more hands‑on training.
For Belgian teams starting to harness GenAI safely, practical workplace upskilling - like Nucamp's Nucamp AI Essentials for Work bootcamp - turns strategy into usable skills, helping firms capture ROI without losing control of data, governance or customer trust.
Attribute | Information |
---|---|
Program | AI Essentials for Work bootcamp |
Length | 15 Weeks |
Focus | AI tools, prompt writing, job-based practical AI skills |
Cost (early bird) | $3,582 |
Syllabus / Register | AI Essentials for Work syllabus (Nucamp) • Register for AI Essentials for Work (Nucamp) |
“The changing environment of AI, encompassing traditional AI and the nascent GenAI and agentic AI, will unequivocally reveal which organizations possess superior data and enterprise architecture. This architectural strength will become the decisive competitive advantage for deploying AI services with optimal speed to market.” - Anthony Belpaire, Head of AI at BNP Paribas Fortis
Table of Contents
- Key AI mechanisms cutting costs in Belgian financial firms
- Quantified outcomes and real-world examples relevant to Belgium
- Typical deployment patterns, technology choices and vendor landscape for Belgium
- Belgium-specific AI ecosystem, funding and enablers
- Risks, regulatory context and mitigations for Belgian financial services
- Implementation best practices and governance for Belgian beginners
- Beginner-friendly roadmap and checklist for Belgian financial companies
- Conclusion and next steps for beginners in Belgium
- Frequently Asked Questions
Check out next:
Understand how EU AI Act and DORA compliance will reshape vendor risk and operational resilience for Belgian institutions.
Key AI mechanisms cutting costs in Belgian financial firms
(Up)Belgian banks and insurers are slashing back‑office costs by chaining together intelligent document processing (IDP), RPA and AI‑driven KYC so paperwork that once bottlenecked lending and claims becomes near‑instant fuel for decisions - imagine a Friday claim checked in real time rather than languishing in a Monday queue.
IDP+RPA speeds data extraction and straight‑through‑processing (STP) for loans and claims, generative models cut model‑training time for new document types from weeks to minutes, and workflow platforms and “copilots” stitch extraction to compliance checks and case management so human reviewers only see the 10–20% of complex exceptions.
Vendors report big wins: higher STP and No‑Touch rates, faster turnarounds and material cost reductions that let teams redeploy people into revenue‑generating work rather than repetitive data entry - a pragmatic recipe for Belgian firms balancing AML/KYC burdens and customer expectations (see Netcall: Automating back-end processes to match front-end customer experience and Tungsten TotalAgility workflow automation platform).
Mechanism | What it automates | Reported impact (source) |
---|---|---|
Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) | Claims, loan docs, KYC forms | STP rates ≥80%; faster loan reviews (Netcall, Infrrd) |
RPA + Workflow Orchestration | Data routing, case management, approvals | Turnaround ↑ ~42%; cost reduction ~38% (Tungsten) |
AI KYC & OCR | Onboarding, screening, continuous monitoring | Lower onboarding costs, fewer false positives (Capgemini, ARDEM) |
“By utilising AI, these tools can accurately extract data from a variety of documents – and populate it into an easy-to-interpret interface. This means – if an insurance claim is submitted on a Friday, instead of being added to a queue to be reviewed by a human worker on a Monday, the documents can be checked in real-time. If anything is missing, customers can be notified right away, even on the weekend.” - Pol Brouckaert, Director Netcall EU
Quantified outcomes and real-world examples relevant to Belgium
(Up)Belgian financial teams can point to concrete, repeatable wins when justifying AI investments: SAS reports a global bank that cut customer‑complaint handling time by 20–40%, increased complaints managed by 20% and reduced costs by 8–15% after deploying SAS Viya, outcomes echoed in community write‑ups showing response time drops of 30–40% and complaint resolution improvements of 20–25% - savings that translate into fewer weekend backlog‑bottlenecks and faster service for busy Belgian customers (SAS: AI in Banking and SAS Viya case study, SAS Community article on complaints management with generative AI).
Other SAS case studies show complementary gains - Seacoast boosted risk‑adjusted revenue per customer by 30%, CIMB shrank time spent finding the right data from 80% to 20%, and Daiwa raised purchase rates 2.7x with analytics - evidence that Belgian banks and insurers can expect both cost reduction and top‑line lift when AI is tied to clear workflows.
For Belgian beginners, these figures make the “so what?” obvious: AI can turn manual queues into near‑real‑time decisions and reallocate staff from data drudgery to higher‑value customer work; practical pilots that mirror these SAS examples are a low‑risk way to prove value before broader rollouts (Guide to GenAI chatbots and customer service in Belgium (2025)).
“We want our customers to have peace of mind that they can access us, and we'll be there for them. Understanding the customer and streamlining their experience with the use of technology, including AI, is essential to our commitment.” - Osamu Hasegawa, Director of the Artificial Intelligence Office, Daiwa Securities
Typical deployment patterns, technology choices and vendor landscape for Belgium
(Up)Belgian banks and insurers typically deploy AI by building central AI units and validated roadmaps, then stitching best‑of‑breed tools into hybrid stacks that pair cloud platforms and workflow engines with specialised partners - a pragmatic “pilot‑to‑scale” pattern seen across the market.
Frontline choices trend toward document‑first automation (IDP + RPA + workflow orchestration) for immediate cost takeout, while GenAI copilots and chatbots handle customer service and developer productivity; organisationally, this is implemented via competence centres, governance playbooks and external advisers who accelerate integration and compliance.
Vendors and partners mix global players and local specialists: enterprise cloud and Microsoft Copilot ecosystems, consulting firms that run scale playbooks, and niche vendors for IDP and orchestration - a landscape described in the FinTech Belgium 2025 AI Barometer report, PwC GenAI in Financial Services event coverage, and Cognizant Benelux Generative AI adoption insights.
Deployment pattern | Typical tech | Common vendors/partners | Belgium note |
---|---|---|---|
Centralised AI unit → scale | GenAI copilots, MLOps, governance frameworks | Microsoft, PwC, Sailpeak | 85% of institutions have an AI unit (FinTech Belgium) |
Back‑office automation first | IDP, RPA, workflow orchestration | Netcall, Tungsten, SAS | Document processing = leading high‑impact use case (EY ~66%) |
Consultant‑assisted rollouts | Cloud + data architecture, compliance toolkits | Cognizant, PwC, local fintech partners | Over 60% have validated roadmaps; many use consultants to bridge gaps |
“The changing environment of AI, encompassing traditional AI and the nascent GenAI and agentic AI, will unequivocally reveal which organizations possess superior data and enterprise architecture. This architectural strength will become the decisive competitive advantage for deploying AI services with optimal speed to market.” - Anthony Belpaire, Head of AI at BNP Paribas Fortis
Belgium-specific AI ecosystem, funding and enablers
(Up)Belgium's AI ecosystem is deliberately multi‑layered: a national
AI 4 Belgium
coordination effort sets ethics, skills and uptake goals while regions supply the cash, talent pipelines and testbeds that make AI practical for banks and insurers - see the European Commission's Belgium AI Strategy for the full picture (Belgium AI Strategy report - European Commission AI Watch).
Flanders backs an annual EUR 32M action plan (EUR 15M for company adoption, EUR 12M for basic research, EUR 5M for training and outreach) complemented by VLAIO and FWO research grants, Wallonia runs DigitalWallonia4.ai (≈EUR 18M/year) and the TRAIL‑funded ARIAC project (EUR 32M, 2021–2026) that plans ~50 PhDs, while Brussels channels Innoviris funding (a dedicated ~EUR 22M programme and roughly EUR 44M invested since 2017) into R&D and seed support.
Policy and funding aim to close the skills gap and unlock public data (Data.gov.be) while the national convergence plan stresses trustworthy deployment, cybersecurity and public‑private cooperation - a pragmatic backbone for Belgian financial firms aiming to scale pilots without reinventing the funding wheel (Belgium National Convergence Plan for AI - DIG.watch, Trustworthy AI guidance for Belgium - Act Legal).
The result: rapidly rising enterprise uptake (from ~13.8% to ~24.7% in 2023–24) and a real pipeline of funded projects that can move labs into live banking workflows.
Region | Key programmes | Budget / note |
---|---|---|
Federal | AI4Belgium coordination, Data.gov.be | Policy framework; multi‑level governance |
Flanders | Flemish AI action plan, VLAIO, FWO | EUR 32M/year (15M company, 12M research, 5M support); FWO ~EUR15M; VLAIO ~EUR45M |
Wallonia | DigitalWallonia4.ai, ARIAC (TRAIL) | DigitalWallonia ≈EUR18M/year; ARIAC EUR 32M (2021–2026), ~50 PhDs |
Brussels | Innoviris, regional incubators | Dedicated budget ≈EUR22M; ~EUR44M invested since 2017 |
Risks, regulatory context and mitigations for Belgian financial services
(Up)Belgian banks and insurers face familiar AI hazards - bias, hallucinations, data leakage, supplier concentration and heightened cyber‑risk - but the policy and playbook to manage them is clearer than ever: the ECB's assessment of AI in the financial system flags systemic amplifiers like widespread adoption and a small number of dominant AI suppliers, plus concrete threats such as AI‑powered phishing and deepfakes that can scale attacks on customer channels (ECB analysis of AI benefits and risks in the financial system); practitioners therefore pair that vigilance with operational controls from the industry playbook - tight data governance, inventorying and monitoring of models, third‑party controls, and human‑in‑the‑loop checks.
Practical mitigations recommended by governance specialists include updating risk inventories, proactive legal and compliance engagement, regular model auditing and explainability work, and clear vendor management - summarised in Capco's guidance on GenAI governance (Capco: Five Foundational Elements for GenAI Governance in Financial Services), while platform vendors and architects stress that data governance must come first before GenAI experiments (Databricks: Simplifying Data Governance for AI-Driven Financial Services).
The upshot for Belgian firms: treat governance as a live programme - policies, monitoring, audits and a named accountability chain - so a convincing weekend deepfake can be caught by process rather than panic.
Implementation best practices and governance for Belgian beginners
(Up)For Belgian beginners, implementation best practices mean turning high‑level rules into everyday habits: start with an AI readiness assessment, catalog models and data, and make data governance the non‑negotiable foundation so teams can interrogate lineage, quality and consent; then layer a lightweight AI committee or governance board that assigns clear owners, accountability and an audit trail for each use case so decisions are explainable and auditable - think of governance like a bank reconciliation for models.
Prioritise quick wins (IDP, KYC, customer copilots) under strict monitoring, produce artefacts such as model cards and DPIAs, and bake continuous validation and user training into deployment cycles; these steps map to the five‑part operational framework (readable guidance on lifecycle checks) and to Belgium's market reality where the EU AI Act and local roadmaps demand traceability and documentation (Sailpeak 2024 AI report on Belgian financial services).
Practical controls - project intake gating, vendor risk reviews, and regular audits - make compliance achievable without stifling pilots, so firms can scale responsibly while keeping regulators and customers confident (Crowe insight on AI governance in finance).
Effective AI governance requires broader stakeholder involvement and oversight. Strong data governance provides the essential foundation for ...
Beginner-friendly roadmap and checklist for Belgian financial companies
(Up)Begin with a short, practical roadmap: run an AI readiness assessment and inventory data and models, then pick two high‑impact, low‑risk pilots - think customer onboarding automation, intelligent document processing (IDP) or real‑time fraud detection - that mirror Belgian case studies and scale quickly; use the Euranova Belgian bank AI case study: asset‑liability uplift and fraud prediction as a template for pairing asset‑liability uplift with fraud models that “predict the likelihood of a transaction being fraudulent before it is completed”.
Build governance and documentation from day one (model cards, DPIAs, vendor reviews) and tap regional enablers and funding routes highlighted in the national AI strategy and the Sailpeak and FinTech Belgium 2024 AI in Financial Services barometer to reduce cost and risk when moving pilots to production.
Address talent gaps with targeted upskilling and simple metrics that matter in Benelux - productivity plus revenue impact - and follow industry guidance to reuse synthetic data and audit trails for safer testing (Avanade Benelux banking AI readiness and generative AI report).
The checklist: assess readiness, choose IDP/onboarding/fraud pilot, secure data governance, assign owners and KPIs, run short iterative sprints, and document results for regulator and board review.
“We want our customers to have peace of mind that they can access us, and we'll be there for them. Understanding the customer and streamlining their experience with the use of technology, including AI, is essential to our commitment.” - Osamu Hasegawa, Director of the Artificial Intelligence Office, Daiwa Securities
Conclusion and next steps for beginners in Belgium
(Up)Belgian beginners should treat AI as a pragmatic toolkit: start small, prove value, and lock governance and data controls in from day one - pick two low‑risk pilots (IDP for onboarding or an RM “copilot” in private banking) that deliver measurable time savings and clearer audit trails, then scale the winners.
EY's guidance on augmenting Relationship Managers shows how automation can free hours of admin so advisers spend more time on strategic client conversations (EY: How to Leverage AI for Growth and Cost Efficiency in Private Banking), while the Sailpeak / FinTech Belgium Barometer makes the case that Belgium's market and funding landscape now supports rapid pilots and meaningful rollouts (Sailpeak: AI in Financial Services Report 2024).
Pair each pilot with a DPIA, model inventory and vendor checklist, assign owners, and commit to short sprints that produce regulator‑ready artefacts; the quickest “so what?” is operational time reclaimed for revenue‑focused work rather than data drudgery - often visible within weeks, not years.
Attribute | Information |
---|---|
Program | AI Essentials for Work bootcamp |
Length | 15 Weeks |
Focus | AI tools, prompt writing, job‑based practical AI skills |
Cost (early bird) | $3,582 |
Syllabus / Register | AI Essentials for Work syllabus - Nucamp Register for AI Essentials for Work - Nucamp |
Frequently Asked Questions
(Up)How is AI cutting costs and improving efficiency in Belgian banks and insurers?
Belgian financial firms combine intelligent document processing (IDP), RPA/workflow orchestration and AI-driven KYC to automate back-office tasks. IDP+RPA speeds data extraction and straight-through-processing (STP), generative models shorten model training from weeks to minutes, and copilots stitch extraction to compliance so humans only handle 10–20% complex exceptions. Reported impacts include STP rates ≥80%, turnaround time improvements (~42%), and cost reductions (~38%) in vendor case studies - enabling staff redeployment to revenue-generating work.
How widespread is AI adoption in Belgium's financial sector and what are the common deployment patterns?
Adoption is accelerating: the 2025 FinTech Belgium AI Barometer finds ~85% of institutions host an AI unit and over 60% have validated roadmaps, with many rolling out GenAI for customer service and coding assistance. Typical deployment follows a pilot-to-scale pattern: centralised AI units and roadmaps, back-office automation first (IDP+RPA+workflow), then GenAI copilots for customers and developers. Stacks mix cloud platforms, MLOps, specialised IDP/orchestration vendors and consultants.
What regulatory risks do Belgian financial firms need to manage and how should they mitigate them?
Key risks include bias, hallucinations, data leakage, supplier concentration and AI-enabled cyber threats. Regulators (ECB) highlight systemic amplifiers from widescale adoption and dominant suppliers. Practical mitigations: treat governance as a live programme - tight data governance, model inventorying and monitoring, third-party/vendor controls, DPIAs and model audits, human-in-the-loop checks, clear ownership and audit trails. These steps align with EU/Belgian guidance and help keep pilots regulator-ready.
What are the recommended first steps and a beginner-friendly roadmap for Belgian financial teams?
Start with an AI readiness assessment and inventory of data/models, then run two high-impact, low-risk pilots (e.g., IDP for onboarding, KYC automation or real-time fraud detection). Build governance from day one (model cards, DPIAs, vendor reviews), assign owners and KPIs, run short iterative sprints, document results for board/regulator review, and use synthetic data and audit trails for safe testing. Prioritise quick wins to prove ROI before wider scale.
How can Belgian teams close the skills gap and where can they get practical training?
Teams should prioritise hands-on, job-focused upskilling that teaches AI tools, prompt engineering and workplace use cases. An example is the AI Essentials for Work bootcamp: 15 weeks long, focused on practical AI tools and prompt writing, with an early-bird cost of $3,582. Pair training with on-the-job pilots so employees translate strategy into usable skills and capture ROI without losing control of data or governance.
You may be interested in the following topics as well:
Learn why Model governance and explainability for lenders are critical when automating credit decisions under the EU AI Act.
See how AI‑augmented cybersecurity and incident reporting speeds triage, generates regulator-ready summaries and improves SOC efficiency.
Ludo Fourrage
Founder and CEO
Ludovic (Ludo) Fourrage is an education industry veteran, named in 2017 as a Learning Technology Leader by Training Magazine. Before founding Nucamp, Ludo spent 18 years at Microsoft where he led innovation in the learning space. As the Senior Director of Digital Learning at this same company, Ludo led the development of the first of its kind 'YouTube for the Enterprise'. More recently, he delivered one of the most successful Corporate MOOC programs in partnership with top business schools and consulting organizations, i.e. INSEAD, Wharton, London Business School, and Accenture, to name a few. With the belief that the right education for everyone is an achievable goal, Ludo leads the nucamp team in the quest to make quality education accessible