Work Smarter, Not Harder: Top 5 AI Prompts Every Finance Professional in United Arab Emirates Should Use in 2025
Last Updated: September 3rd 2025

Too Long; Didn't Read:
UAE finance pros should use five regulator‑ready AI prompts in 2025: DPIA/regulatory risk checks, algorithmic pricing fairness, AML transaction‑scenario builders, explainable model summaries for boards, and AI liability/IP contract clauses - aligning with UAE AI Strategy targets (AED 335B by 2031).
For finance professionals in the UAE, precise AI prompts are not a novelty but a strategic advantage: the UAE National AI Strategy 2031 aims to embed AI across sectors and add AED 335 billion to the economy (targeting roughly 20% of non‑oil GDP by 2031), so prompt-writing moves from curiosity to compliance and competitive edge.
Clear, governance-aware prompts can accelerate AML/CFT screening, fraud detection pilots and AR automation - real cashflow wins like Zapliance's DSO reductions are already showing up in UAE trials - while aligning analyses with the strategy's ethics and data‑sharing goals.
Start with practical templates that map to local rules; Nucamp's AI Essentials for Work syllabus offers hands‑on prompt practice tailored to workplace use cases.
Bootcamp | Length | Cost (early bird) | Syllabus |
---|---|---|---|
AI Essentials for Work | 15 Weeks | $3,582 | AI Essentials for Work syllabus - Nucamp |
“decoupling” from China while seeking to maintain broader economic ties.
Table of Contents
- Methodology: How I picked these top 5 prompts
- Prompt 1 - Dubai Health Authority: 'Regulatory Risk Assessment for AI-Powered Financial Product'
- Prompt 2 - IHC (International Holding Company): 'Algorithmic Pricing Fairness Checker'
- Prompt 3 - Mastercard Global Centre for Advanced AI and Cyber Technology: 'Transaction Monitoring and Financial Crime Scenario Builder'
- Prompt 4 - Mohamed bin Zayed University of Artificial Intelligence: 'Explainable Model Summary for Board Reports'
- Prompt 5 - MGX: 'Contract Clause Generator for AI Liability and IP'
- Conclusion: Practical next steps for UAE finance professionals
- Frequently Asked Questions
Check out next:
Discover lessons from Emirates NBD EVA and real UAE projects to inform your AI roadmap.
Methodology: How I picked these top 5 prompts
(Up)Selection prioritized prompts that map directly to the UAE's multi‑jurisdictional reality - mainland law, DIFC and ADGM free‑zone rules - and to concrete compliance hooks decision‑makers will recognise: mandatory DPIAs, AI registers, Autonomous Systems Officers and certification pathways in Regulation 10, plus federal oversight via the AIATC and PDPL obligations.
Each prompt was bench‑tested for regulatory relevance (does it surface Regulation 10 requirements and the DIFC Accelerator sandbox?), operational utility (will it generate the DPIA inputs, audit trails or vendor‑due‑diligence checklists firms need?), and risk focus (fairness, explainability, AML/CFT screening and contract liability).
Priority went to prompts that produce evidence an auditor or regulator can verify - for example, a prompt that yields an AI‑register entry or a human‑override rule mirrors the “digital logbook” regulators are already asking for - and to ones suited for sandbox testing such as RegLab or the DIFC Accelerator.
For legal and jurisdictional grounding see the DIFC Regulation 10 guidance and a concise UAE AI regulation overview: DIFC Regulation 10 guidance and resources and UAE federal AI regulation overview.
Prompt 1 - Dubai Health Authority: 'Regulatory Risk Assessment for AI-Powered Financial Product'
(Up)When building a Regulatory Risk Assessment prompt for an AI‑powered financial product that processes or links to Dubai health data (for example, offerings touching health insurers or fintech services using patient records), surface the specific safeguards regulators now expect: require transparency about AI functions, human‑override and appeals pathways, strong data‑security controls, and documentation for DPIAs and audits so decisions can be verified by auditors or the DHA; the Dubai Health Authority's AI guidance and NABIDH rollout make this concrete - NABIDH already unifies millions of records - so the prompt should flag any access to NABIDH or Dubai‑sourced datasets and map obligations under UAE data law and DIFC/PDPL AI provisions to each risk item (see DHA guidance and a practical overview of UAE AI/data rules for finance firms).
Embed checklist outputs: jurisdictional gate (mainland vs DIFC/ADGM), DPIA status, human‑in‑loop controls, breach/incident playbook, and vendor due‑diligence notes so the assessment yields regulator‑ready evidence rather than vague assurances.
For DHA details see the DHA press release and for how DIFC/PDPL and AI rules layer onto financial‑sector projects consult the UAE AI/data overview. Practical overview of UAE AI and data rules for finance professionals (Nucamp AI Essentials for Work syllabus)
Metric | Value |
---|---|
NABIDH unified patient records | 9.53 million |
Connected healthcare facilities | 1,500+ |
Healthcare professional engagement with NABIDH | 82% |
“The implementation of Patient Privacy Intelligence within NABIDH marks a new era of secure, patient-focused digital healthcare in Dubai. By safeguarding patient data through advanced AI and behavioural analytics, we are setting a new benchmark in healthcare security and compliance.” - Mona Bajman, CEO, Shared Support Services Sector, DHA
Prompt 2 - IHC (International Holding Company): 'Algorithmic Pricing Fairness Checker'
(Up)For an IHC-grade "Algorithmic Pricing Fairness Checker" prompt, ask the model to act as a cross-disciplinary compliance reviewer that maps algorithm inputs and controls to UAE competition and AI rules - flagging whether the pricing engine ingests competitor or non‑public data, whether decision‑making is human‑confirmable, and whether audit trails, data lineage and override controls exist so a regulator or an internal auditor can verify independence; the UAE's evolving AI and competition framework (see UAE AI, Machine Learning & Big Data Laws 2025) treats digital markets as a competition frontier, so the prompt should produce regulator‑ready outputs: a jurisdictional risk matrix (mainland, DIFC, ADGM), a list of data sources, a summary of any third‑party intermediary access, suggested mitigations (restrict inputs to public or user‑internal data, retain final human pricing authority) and monitoring rules to spot alignment with market peers - for example, an alert if recommendations are adopted in the 80–90% range that courts have treated as a red flag.
Pair the checklist with a runnable script outline for periodic statistical fairness tests and a plain‑language memo the board can use. For background on why algorithmic pricing draws scrutiny, see the practical antitrust framework in FTI Consulting's analysis of dynamic pricing risks.
“If anything, the use of A.I. or algorithmic-based technologies should concern us more because it's much easier to price fix when you're outsourcing it to an algorithm versus when you're sharing manila envelopes in a smoke-filled room.” - Jonathan Kanter, Assistant Attorney General.
Prompt 3 - Mastercard Global Centre for Advanced AI and Cyber Technology: 'Transaction Monitoring and Financial Crime Scenario Builder'
(Up)Design the “Transaction Monitoring & Financial Crime Scenario Builder” prompt around two real-world anchors: Mastercard's TRACE network‑level AML service for RTP systems and the UAE's fast‑moving move to real‑time, risk‑based monitoring - the prompt should ask the model to generate regulator‑ready scenarios (money‑mule dispersals across RTP rails, layering and TBML typologies, or rapid cross‑border spikes) that map to UAE obligations, produce clear alert narratives, and output explainable audit trails and playbooks investigators can action; tie each scenario to testing rules that reduce false positives and enable perpetual KYC or real‑time holds, and include checks that surface whether a pattern would trigger goAML reporting or local supervisory attention.
Use the scenario builder to stress‑test controls (for example, simulate a dispersed payout chain across instant‑payment rails) so teams can see the red thread from initial alert to investigator brief - a practical way to turn AI insights into audit‑ready evidence.
For implementation and regional context, see the Mastercard TRACE network-level AML announcement and the Central Bank of the UAE transaction monitoring guidance.
“AI plays a critical role in our operations, powering our products and fueling our network intelligence to improve digital experiences while reducing financial fraud and risk.” - Ajay Bhalla, president, Cyber & Intelligence, Mastercard
Prompt 4 - Mohamed bin Zayed University of Artificial Intelligence: 'Explainable Model Summary for Board Reports'
(Up)Prompt 4 - Mohamed bin Zayed University of Artificial Intelligence: "Explainable Model Summary for Board Reports" should turn technical model cards into crisp, regulator‑friendly narratives that UAE finance leaders can act on - a one‑page snapshot of purpose, dataset provenance, domain‑shift sensitivity, explainability metrics, human‑override rules and a short audit checklist.
Ground the prompt in MBZUAI's work on domain generalization and explainability (see an Alumni Spotlight on Adnan Khan's focus on explainable AI and governance) and in MBZUAI's practitioner‑research forums like The AI Quorum, which stress human‑centered evaluation and cross‑disciplinary review; ask the model to flag where a model trained elsewhere might fail on UAE data, translate technical diagnostics into two board bullets (risk + recommended control), and append a one‑line implementation note for internal audit or the sustainability team.
Linking MBZUAI research and convenings into the prompt helps ensure the summary reflects both cutting‑edge methods and the UAE's evolving governance expectations.
AI Quorum item | Detail |
---|---|
Dates | Open: October 2022 - Close: March 2023 |
Mode / Frequency | Hybrid sessions - Monthly |
Duration | 5 months |
“MBZUAI was a totally new experience for me - very fulling and very rewarding not only from an academic perspective, but also from a personal perspective,” he says.
Prompt 5 - MGX: 'Contract Clause Generator for AI Liability and IP'
(Up)For a MGX‑focused
Contract Clause Generator for AI Liability and IP
, the prompt should spit out crisp, UAE‑ready clauses that turn legal complexity into boardroom‑ready contract language: require warranties of PDPL and DIFC Regulation 10 compliance (including DPIAs and Autonomous Systems Officer obligations), clear allocation of fault‑based versus strict or vicarious liability, firm indemnities for third‑party IP and data‑training claims, and an IP annex that defines background/foreground rights and ownership of AI outputs under Federal Decree‑Law No.
38/2021; add concrete acceptance tests, SLAs, breach‑notification timelines, audit and model‑weights escrow rights, and an insurance rider for emerging AI exposures.
The generator should also draft competition‑safe pricing clauses to thread the needle with Federal Decree‑Law No. 36/2023, and produce a vendor due‑diligence checklist and a plain‑language remediation playbook so auditors see evidence not buzzwords.
For legal framing and market context, link draft clauses to the UAE AI practice guide and recent reporting on MGX's big‑ticket AI ambitions so counsel can map contract language to current regulatory and commercial realities (Bird & Bird UAE AI practice guide for 2025 - UAE AI legal guidance, Bloomberg Law report on MGX AI fundraising - Abu Dhabi MGX investment fund).
Clause Type | Focus | UAE Legal Hook |
---|---|---|
Liability & Indemnities | Cap, apportionment, strict/vicarious allocation, insurance | Civil Code, liability theories (fault/strict), Consumer Protection |
Data & DPIA Controls | Mandatory DPIA, breach timelines, data handling & audit rights | PDPL (Federal Decree‑Law No.45/2021), DIFC Reg.10, Health Data Law |
IP & Outputs | Foreground/background rights, licences, third‑party indemnity | Federal Decree‑Law No.38/2021 (Copyright), procurement/IP guidance |
Conclusion: Practical next steps for UAE finance professionals
(Up)Practical next steps for UAE finance teams: start by mapping every AI system and classifying it by risk so high‑impact tools (credit scoring, AML/KYC, pricing engines) get DPIAs, human‑in‑the‑loop controls and rigorous vendor due diligence - measures stressed across UAE guidance such as the Bird & Bird UAE AI practice guide - AI, Machine Learning & Big Data Laws 2025 (UAE) (Bird & Bird UAE AI practice guide - AI, Machine Learning & Big Data Laws 2025 (UAE)) and in sector playbooks that flag PDPL and DIFC Regulation 10 obligations; second, use sandbox and RegLab testing before rollouts and build explainable monitoring so transaction‑monitoring scenarios feed regulator‑ready evidence (a critical step as the UAE consolidates AML gains after FATF scrutiny - grey‑listing cost estimates of up to 7.6% of GDP underscore the stakes, per IMF analysis cited in recent coverage); third, align procurement and contracts with clause checklists for liability, IP and audit rights; and fourth, close the skills gap via targeted, hands‑on training (for example, Nucamp's AI Essentials for Work bootcamp - Gain practical AI skills for any workplace with prompt design, prompt testing, and governance playbooks) so teams learn prompt design, prompt testing, and governance playbooks that turn AI from a compliance risk into an operational advantage.
Small, regimented moves - inventory, DPIA, sandbox, explainability, and training - yield outsized protection and faster, regulator‑ready outcomes.
Bootcamp | Length | Cost (early bird) | Registration |
---|---|---|---|
AI Essentials for Work | 15 Weeks | $3,582 | Register - Nucamp AI Essentials for Work (15 Weeks) |
Frequently Asked Questions
(Up)What are the top AI prompts every finance professional in the UAE should use in 2025?
The article highlights five regulator‑aware, audit‑ready prompts: 1) Regulatory Risk Assessment for AI‑Powered Financial Products (DHA/NABIDH contextualised), 2) Algorithmic Pricing Fairness Checker (IHC‑grade pricing engines), 3) Transaction Monitoring & Financial Crime Scenario Builder (Mastercard TRACE / UAE real‑time AML), 4) Explainable Model Summary for Board Reports (MBZUAI‑informed model cards), and 5) Contract Clause Generator for AI Liability and IP (MGX‑focused vendor contracts). Each prompt is designed to produce evidence an auditor or regulator can verify, including DPIA outputs, jurisdictional risk matrices (mainland vs DIFC/ADGM), audit trails, and human‑override controls.
How do these prompts align with UAE regulations and compliance requirements?
Prompts were selected and bench‑tested for regulatory relevance against UAE frameworks such as DIFC Regulation 10, PDPL, federal AI oversight (AIATC), and sector guidance (DHA, Central Bank). They surface mandatory elements like DPIAs, AI registers, Autonomous Systems Officer duties, human‑in‑loop rules, breach notification timelines, and vendor due‑diligence - producing outputs (checklists, audit trails, jurisdictional gate assessments) that map directly to regulator expectations and sandbox testing requirements (DIFC Accelerator/RegLab).
What practical outputs should each prompt produce to be 'regulator‑ready'?
Regulator‑ready outputs include: a jurisdictional gate (mainland vs DIFC/ADGM), DPIA status and documented mitigation steps, data provenance and lineage, human‑override and explainability controls, vendor due‑diligence notes, incident playbooks, audit trails and acceptance tests, contract clauses with liability/IP allocations, and runnable test scripts or scenario descriptions for AML/transaction monitoring. Prompts should also yield plain‑language board memos and implementation notes for internal audit.
How should UAE finance teams implement these prompts operationally?
Follow these practical next steps: 1) Inventory and classify AI systems by risk (credit scoring, AML, pricing engines prioritized); 2) Run DPIAs and map jurisdictional obligations; 3) Use sandboxes/RegLab testing before production; 4) Convert prompt outputs into monitoring rules, detector scenarios and investigator playbooks for audit trails; 5) Integrate contract clauses and vendor checklists into procurement; 6) Upskill teams with hands‑on training (e.g., Nucamp's AI Essentials for Work) to build prompt design, testing and governance capabilities.
What metrics or case examples support the value of these prompts in the UAE context?
The article cites UAE policy and regional pilots to show impact: the UAE National AI Strategy 2031 targets AED 335 billion GDP uplift; NABIDH has unified ~9.53 million patient records and 1,500+ connected facilities (relevant to DHA prompts); pilots like Zapliance showed DSO reductions via AR automation; Mastercard TRACE and Central Bank guidance underpin real‑time transaction monitoring scenarios; and IMF/FATF analyses underscore the economic stakes of AML compliance. These data points justify prioritising DPIAs, explainability and regulator‑ready evidence.
You may be interested in the following topics as well:
Focus on the human skills that complement AI, like advisory, relationship management, and leadership.
Learn how Quantivate's AI-driven GRC and risk scoring helps UAE risk teams centralize controls and evidence for regulators.
Ludo Fourrage
Founder and CEO
Ludovic (Ludo) Fourrage is an education industry veteran, named in 2017 as a Learning Technology Leader by Training Magazine. Before founding Nucamp, Ludo spent 18 years at Microsoft where he led innovation in the learning space. As the Senior Director of Digital Learning at this same company, Ludo led the development of the first of its kind 'YouTube for the Enterprise'. More recently, he delivered one of the most successful Corporate MOOC programs in partnership with top business schools and consulting organizations, i.e. INSEAD, Wharton, London Business School, and Accenture, to name a few. With the belief that the right education for everyone is an achievable goal, Ludo leads the nucamp team in the quest to make quality education accessible