Top 10 AI Prompts and Use Cases and in the Government Industry in Singapore

Singapore's government has moved quickly from strategy to scaled, governed use of AI: NAIS 2.0 and the Model AI Governance Framework set the tone while practical tools - Pair, AIBots and integrated services like Moments of Life - are reshaping how citizens interact with agencies.

Government tech teams are pairing productivity gains (Pair is used across dozens of agencies with tens of thousands of users) with careful governance, sandboxes and cross‑agency playbooks so innovations like agentic AI can be tested safely with partners such as Google Cloud.

The result is a pragmatic mix of personalised, proactive services and robust oversight: fewer silos, faster outcomes, and clear rules for explainability and human‑in‑the‑loop checks.

For public servants and early adopters looking to apply AI responsibly at work, Singapore's approach is a playbook for balancing impact with trust - start small, prove value, then scale under the Model AI Governance Framework and national guidance from the Public Service.

Singapore AI in the Public Service guidance and the Moments of Life citizen services platform case study are good places to begin.

Like any technology, AI should not be a hammer in search of a nail. What we will do is to ensure the tech stack is available, so that agencies can focus on solving their problem well.

Methodology: this piece synthesises official Singapore guidance, technical toolkits and public consultations to define a practical reading list and assessment criteria for government AI use - focusing on IMDA's operational work (AI Verify, toolkits and sandboxes), the Model AI Governance Framework for Generative AI, and related testing projects such as Project Moonshot and the Generative AI Evaluation Sandbox.

Primary sources were IMDA materials and press releases, the AI Verify Foundation outputs (open-sourced toolkits and plugins), and sector guidance referenced by ISAGO/Veritas for finance and health; selection favoured published frameworks, open‑source testing code and documented pilots so claims can be validated - e.g., AI Verify was open‑sourced in 2023 with participation from 50+ firms.

Scope: Singapore public‑sector and agency deployments (Traditional AI and GenAI), emphasising testing, incident reporting, explainability, data governance and third‑party assurance.

Criteria: alignment to the 11 AI Verify principles and the nine GenAI dimensions (accountability, data, trusted development, testing/assurance, security, provenance, incident reporting, safety R&D, public‑good).

For details see IMDA's AI overview and the Model AI Governance Framework for Generative AI.

Be aware of scammers impersonating as IMDA officers. Government officials will NEVER call you to transfer money, disclose bank log-in details or request for your personal information. For scam-related advice, please call the ScamShield Helpline at 1799 or go to ScamShield official website.

GPT‑Legal Q&A tools can be a huge productivity boost for Singapore's legal teams and agency counsel - speeding up case law searches, surfacing relevant authorities and drafting first‑pass pleadings - but the evidence says proceed with caution: generative models hallucinate, sometimes telling plausible but false stories about precedent, and even specialised legal systems still err.

Recent benchmarking found general‑purpose chatbots hallucinated on the majority of legal prompts (58–82%), while leading research products still produced incorrect or mis‑grounded answers in roughly 17–34% of queries, so human review, provenance checks and retrieval‑augmented workflows are non‑negotiable.

Practical safeguards used by courts and administrators elsewhere - team‑based governance, clear vendor contract terms, “human‑in‑the‑loop” review and public benchmarking - map neatly onto Singapore's playbook for tested, auditable rollouts.

For agencies building or procuring GPT‑based legal assistants, insist on verifiable citations, rigorous testing against local precedents, and disclosure rules for AI use in filings so judges, clerks and citizens retain clarity about what is machine‑generated and what rests on human judgement; see the Stanford HAI/RegLab benchmarking report on legal-model hallucinations and Judicature's guidance for detailed warnings and use cases.

“The key to the proper use of AI in the law is as a tool to assist litigants, counsel, and judges in performing legal tasks - not to replace them.”

An Agentic AGM Demonstrator brings the promise of agentic process automation into the nitty‑gritty of corporate secretarial work - automating statutory filings, board‑pack preparation, vendor KYC and government compliance checks so teams spend less time on form‑filling and more on judgment and audit‑ready oversight.

By wiring agentic orchestration into existing systems (document hubs, registries, e‑signature services and compliance rule engines), demonstrators can parse long agreements, flag missing approvals, sequence remediations and trigger human review when risk thresholds appear - drawing directly on the compliance automation playbook that shows how automated remediation slashes manual errors and enforcement risk (see Puppet on automating government compliance).

Practical designs borrow orchestration and governance patterns from agentic automation leaders - planning clear goals, audit logs and escalation gates so agents act within policy (see Capably's description of agentic process automation) and use onboarding/provisioning examples like Rezolve to make Day‑One checks seamless.

A compact demonstrator - sandboxed, observable and scoped to a single corporate registry flow - lets agencies and secretariats prove value fast while building the audit trails needed for scaled, governed rollouts.

Agents operate with intent, not just instructions. They break down goals into subtasks, decide how to proceed, and interact across systems using cognitive abilities and models like large action models.

Singapore's citizen-facing defences now pair ScamShield's hands-on WhatsApp bot and national detection platforms with multilingual AI assistants so residents can verify suspicious links or upload screenshots in seconds; the ScamShield Bot (developed by OGP) leverages crowdsourced reports and police blacklists and the wider ScamShield ecosystem has blocked about 200,000 scam calls and detected at least 3.5 million scam messages since 2022, with roughly 500,000 app users, while GovTech's recent move to join the Global Signal Exchange on 3 September 2025 brings real‑time threat sharing (the GSE tracks hundreds of millions of threat signals) to Singapore's toolkit, enabling faster takedowns and cross‑border intelligence; at the same time, scalable multilingual assistants - such as vendors that advertise on‑premise, hybrid hosting, live translation and dedicated LLMs for governments - can connect citizen reports to fund‑tracing workflows and automated ticketing so investigations begin immediately.

These layers - SATIS website scanning, crowdsourced chat checks and secure, locally hosted conversational agents - form a practical, user‑friendly safety net that flags fake Singpass pages and suspicious payment links before money moves, but they must be paired with clear escalation gates and human review to turn signals into outcomes.

Read more on the ScamShield Bot, GovTech's GSE partnership, and multilingual government assistants from the linked sources below.

“To use digital tools with confidence, our citizens must be able to trust that they are safe. With ever-evolving cyber security threats, this has become a tall order.”

A SingHealth Note Buddy-style assistant - an ambient scribe that transcribes consultations, structures Subjective/Objective/Assessment/Plan notes and nudges triage and differential checks - could sharply reduce clinician paperwork while keeping clinicians in the loop: studies and vendor reports show AI SOAP-note systems can pre-fill 85–99% of a visit's documentation, shave minutes off each patient encounter (SOAP Health reports up to 12 minutes saved per patient) and in some deployments save clinicians as much as two hours a day by cutting post‑clinic charting, all while integrating with EHRs for seamless workflows; see John Snow Labs' work on medical LLMs and AWS integrations for compliant, validated pipelines and Sunoh's overview of specialty templates and EHR connectivity.

Practical safeguards remain essential - structured transcripts, real‑time validation and a human review step stop hallucinations and protect patient safety - and lighter touch features like pre‑visit SMS intake and voice‑to‑text summarisation (reported by Emitrr and others) help the note become a clinical tool, not a chore.

Imagine a clinician finishing rounds with a clean, auditable note for every patient instead of an inbox of unfinished charts - that is the “so what” that turns time back into care.

“You're a victim of it, or you're a triumph because of it. The human mind simply cannot carry all the information about all the patients in the practice without error.”

Singapore's Model AI Governance Framework has matured from high‑level principles into a hands‑on playbook that ties policy to practice: agencies map risks against the Personal Data Protection Act, MAS sector guidance and other statutes, then validate systems with sandboxes and the AI Verify testing toolkit so generative projects can be stress‑tested before they touch live services.

The framework's lineage (the first Model AI Governance Framework appeared in 2019) now sits alongside practical toolkits - including an AI Verify crosswalk with international guidance - that make regulatory impact assessment feel less like guesswork and more like an operational checklist; for busy teams, that means fewer vendor surprises and clearer contract clauses for model provenance.

For those wanting the source maps and international context, see the IAPP Global AI Legislation Tracker and the Nucamp guide on the role of AI Verify and CI/CD safety testing in Singapore government rollouts.

Project Moonshot is Singapore's practical stress‑test for GenAI: a pre‑deployment assurance loop that treats models and their runtime stacks like mission‑critical infrastructure, using red‑teaming to hunt for prompt‑injection, jailbreaking, PII leakage and RAG‑layer exploits before public rollout.

Effective exercises pair manual adversarial thinking with automated attack generators and continuous CI/CD checks so every fine‑tune or data refresh triggers a fresh sweep - exactly the hybrid approach Microsoft recommends in its red‑teaming planning guide - and tools like Confident AI's DeepTeam-style frameworks and Promptfoo's attack/evaluation pipelines let teams scale thousands of probes while preserving high‑signal triage.

The “so what” is immediate: one cleverly crafted prompt can turn a helpful assistant into a data‑leak or policy breach, so building repeatable rounds of threat modelling, multi‑vector attacks, domain‑specific scenarios and automated re‑training pipelines turns risky experiments into auditable, remediable findings that agencies can act on before services touch citizens.

AI Verify's toolkits turn governance from checkbox into workflow: Singapore teams are increasingly folding explainability, audit logs and CI/CD safety testing into procurement and onboarding so models arrive with replayable decision trails and contractual rights to model documentation - exactly the kind of proof auditors and ministers need when a system flags a supplier or citizen case.

Practical procurement playbooks call for vendor disclosure of input data, decision logic and retention policies, so RFPs can demand “why” as well as “what” (see guidance on explainable AI and audit logs from Art of Procurement AI governance framework for procurement and the concrete RFP requirements in the Georgia AI procurement guidelines for responsible use).

For agencies intent on safe rollouts, the AI Verify Toolkit and CI/CD safety testing are becoming standard pre-deployment steps - automated checks, questionnaire-driven due diligence and versioned audit trails make compliance auditable and remediable before services touch citizens (AI Verify Toolkit and CI/CD safety testing guide).

The payoff is simple and vivid: contracts that include access to decision logs let investigators replay why an automated choice was made, turning disputed outcomes into traceable evidence rather than mystery.

“Your data needs to be structured, clean, and relevant, because the better quality data that you put into AI, the better results you get”.

Predictive analytics are becoming the practical linchpin that turns Healthier SG's preventive aims into smarter, faster resource decisions - spotting who needs outreach, when clinics should scale slots, and where community teams should focus.

Models like the Multiple Readmissions Predictive Model already sift thousands of signals to flag high‑risk patients for the Hospital‑to‑Home programme, reporting about seven in ten correct predictions and cutting daily vetting by roughly 10–15% of admissions, while national analytics platforms (BRAIN) stitch together 1.4 billion data points, 7 million records and 200+ variables to produce automated daily risk scores that planners can act on; see the Healthier SG physician workload study - BMC Health Services Research, Multiple Readmissions Predictive Model - Synapxe summary, and Predicting total healthcare demand study - BMC Health Services Research.

“There's too much information. It's hard to judge how to balance [the consult]… HSG requires clinicians to access a separate tab… not part of the routine consult flow.”

Singapore's workforce shift for GenAI should be practical, tested and people‑centred: adopt playbooks that turn lofty promises into day‑to‑day practices - train civil servants on secure, mission‑aligned uses of GenAI, pilot meeting and drafting assistants to shave routine admin, and redesign roles into hybrid AI‑oversight functions so human judgment stays central.

Data.org's playbook for civil servants lays out concrete steps to simplify tasks, speed data analysis and introduce meeting assistants with clear consent and review steps (Data.org GenAI Playbook for Civil Servants - productive GenAI uses for civil servants), while the DHS Generative AI Public Sector Playbook offers a checklist - mission alignment, governance, secure IT environments and staff training - that Singapore agencies can mirror when moving from sandbox to scale (DHS Generative AI Public Sector Playbook - checklist for public sector GenAI adoption).

For planners worried about jobs, redesigning roles into oversight and value‑add work is practical and already advised in local guidance on adaptation and retraining - see approaches to redesign and reskilling in Nucamp's workforce pieces (Nucamp Job Hunt Bootcamp reskilling guidance and role redesign approaches).

The clear “so what”: well‑run playbooks turn uncertain disruption into measurable gains - less time on paperwork, more time on citizen outcomes.

“Transformation is not about technology for technology's sake; it's about improving lives, creating opportunities, and building a better future for everyone.”

Singapore's National Supercomputing Centre ASPIRE sits squarely in the infrastructure crossroads that modern AI demands: GPUs with thermal design power measured in hundreds of watts are turning cabinets into power plants, forcing rethink of power distribution, cooling and grid access so compute can scale without outages or runaway bills.

Design plays include intermediate bus architectures and vertical power delivery to handle per‑cabinet loads that industry analyses now warn can exceed 200 kW, while rack densities for AI pods are creeping into the 60–120 kW/rack range - a jump that makes liquid cooling and precision thermal management non‑negotiable.

Practical responses combine advanced PDN design, on‑site battery storage and renewables to smooth spikes, plus colocation or hybrid hosting for capacity bursts; for deep dives on power strategies see the engineering overview from Flex Power Modules and the industry outlook on AI-driven density and cooling from CoreSite.

The “so what” is immediate: without these changes even well‑spec'd supercomputing centres risk throttled projects or lengthy permitting delays, so energy planning must be part of the compute roadmap from Day One.

“The power usage of a standard processing unit, or chip, inside a server is around 75-200 watts, similar to a light bulb.”

For agencies and beginners in Singapore the next sensible steps are clear and practical: treat AI adoption as a staged programme - start with low‑risk pilots in sandboxes, validate models with the open‑source AI Verify tests and the nine‑dimension checks in the Model AI Governance Framework, and fold the Responsible AI Playbook into development and procurement so safety, explainability and incident reporting are built in from Day One; see the PDPC Model AI Governance Framework and the IMDA generative AI public consultation for detailed, implementable guidance.

Equally important is people: level up practitioners with hands‑on courses that teach prompt design, retrieval‑augmented workflows and governance-minded workflows - programmes like the Nucamp AI Essentials for Work bootcamp provide a practical route to build those skills quickly.

The payoff is measurable: smaller, auditable pilots that protect citizens and data while proving value, so teams can iterate, scale and hand off governed AI services with confidence rather than risk.

Like any technology, AI should not be a hammer in search of a nail. What we will do is to ensure the tech stack is available, so that agencies can focus on solving their problem well.