Top 5 Jobs in Retail That Are Most at Risk from AI in New Zealand - And How to Adapt
Last Updated: September 12th 2025

Too Long; Didn't Read:
In New Zealand retail, AI adoption (82% of organisations) threatens customer‑service agents, cashiers, inventory pickers, sales/merchandising analysts and administrative staff. Case studies show 60% efficiency gains, 40% cost savings and chatbots automating ~30% of enquiries - adapt via targeted upskilling and governance.
AI matters for New Zealand retail because adoption has gone mainstream and the gains are tangible: recent analysis of Kinetics report on AI-driven productivity gains in New Zealand (2025) shows high uptake and big efficiency benefits, and Datacom's tech insights warn that dirty data and the right use cases determine whether retailers actually capture those savings.
In practice, retailers are using AI for demand forecasting, inventory optimisation, personalised chatbots and computer‑vision tills so peak‑time queues shrink as stores adopt hands‑free checkout workflows; but success requires better data, reliable connectivity and staff who can work with AI tools.
Practical workforce responses include focused upskilling: Nucamp's AI Essentials for Work bootcamp (15 weeks) teaches prompt writing and applied AI skills so retail teams can augment customer service and merchandising rather than be displaced.
Metric | 2025 New Zealand figure |
---|---|
Organisations using AI | 82% |
Businesses reporting efficiency gains | 93% |
Firms reporting AI replacing workers | 7% |
“For Kiwis working a 40-hour work week, this is equivalent to working an extra day per week to make up the labour productivity gap, and that's just to reach the average productivity mark. For business owners, it would be the equivalent of hiring one more employee for every five current employees.” - Bridget Snelling, Country Manager, Xero New Zealand
Table of Contents
- Methodology: How we chose the Top 5 using NZ-focused sources (Andrew Hunt, Dr Paul Henderson, McKinsey)
- Customer service / contact-centre agents - why this role is at risk in New Zealand
- Point-of-sale cashiers and checkout staff - automation through self-checkout and computer vision
- Inventory clerks / stock pickers (in-store and micro-fulfilment) - robotics and predictive replenishment
- Sales analysts / merchandising analysts - routine data work replaced by AI analytics
- Administrative / scheduling / back-office retail assistants - RPA and scheduling AI
- Conclusion: How retail workers and managers in New Zealand can adapt and next steps
- Frequently Asked Questions
Check out next:
Adopt practical MLOps best practices for retail to keep models reliable through peak seasons and product launches.
Methodology: How we chose the Top 5 using NZ-focused sources (Andrew Hunt, Dr Paul Henderson, McKinsey)
(Up)Selection of the Top 5 focussed on New Zealand evidence and practical impact: priority went to sources that show real NZ results or directly relevant ANZ technology demonstrations, clear mechanisms by which AI replaces routine tasks, and guidance on the data and operational foundations needed to adapt.
Evidence included a local retail case study showing a mid‑sized chain achieved a 60% efficiency gain and 40% cost savings through automation (ez-ai.nz New Zealand retail AI case study), Spark's CX analysis highlighting why seamless, data‑driven customer journeys matter and that ~40% of organisations use AI to improve customer experience (Spark Insight Engine: data-driven customer experience in NZ), and warehouse automation reporting that illustrates how AMRs, vision systems and solutions like Visual SLAM change picking and fulfilment workflows (PHS Innovate: warehouse automation in Australia and New Zealand).
Roles were scored by NZ relevance, observable automation deployments, reliance on routine data tasks, and the strength of local advice about data foundations and change management (see Data Insight and NZ Manufacturer on building data capability).
The result: a shortlist rooted in NZ proof, not theory, that points managers to the precise skills and data fixes that will make adaptation realistic rather than hypothetical.
Source | Key NZ figure or insight |
---|---|
ez-ai.nz | 60% efficiency gain; 40% cost savings |
Spark Insight Engine | ~40% of organisations using data/AI to improve CX |
PHS Innovate | AMRs, Visual SLAM improve picking and flexibility |
“Data and analytics governance continues to be a significant challenge for many organisations”
Customer service / contact-centre agents - why this role is at risk in New Zealand
(Up)Customer service and contact‑centre roles in Aotearoa are squarely in the spotlight because smarter, localised bots and AI agents are taking over routine enquiries: New Zealand businesses are deploying localised AI chatbots in New Zealand fine‑tuned for NZ English and Māori to make interactions feel natural, while broader adoption trends - 82% of NZ organisations now using AI - mean those automated tools are becoming mainstream (Kinetics 2025 AI adoption report for New Zealand).
Global and NZ stats show chatbots can handle a large share of repetitive tasks (industry figures suggest up to ~30% of contact‑centre work) and virtual assistants can cut incoming enquiries dramatically, so this isn't hypothetical: shifts to hybrid human‑AI models mean agents increasingly become supervisors, editors and escalations specialists rather than first‑response operators.
The practical “so what?” is clear for managers - without deliberate upskilling and governance, agents risk seeing routine parts of their job automated even as the remaining work demands stronger judgement, empathy and tool‑use skills.
Metric | Figure | Source |
---|---|---|
NZ organisations using AI (2025) | 82% | Kinetics |
SMEs experimenting with AI | 82% | Global Thinking |
Chatbots can automate contact‑centre tasks | ~30% | Verloop / industry summaries |
Virtual assistants reduce inquiries | Up to 70% | Gartner / chatbot stats |
“The use of AI needs to be carefully considered, monitored and governed with clear policies and guidelines in place to ensure the risks to business are minimised.” - Karl Wright, Datacom Group CIO and CISO
Point-of-sale cashiers and checkout staff - automation through self-checkout and computer vision
(Up)Point-of-sale cashiers and checkout staff in Aotearoa are at the frontline of automation as self‑checkout and camera‑based computer‑vision systems move from novelty to mainstream: self‑service trials began in 2006 and now, in one central Christchurch New World, more than half of transactions are self‑service while Foodstuffs reports around 25% of store purchases use self‑scan, showing Kiwi shoppers value speed and choice (NZ supermarkets self‑checkout adoption (1News, Nov 2023)).
Globally, the self‑checkout market is booming and vendors are adding AI and vision for product recognition, loss prevention and age checks, with ResearchAndMarkets noting a 2025 market of roughly USD 5.84B and AI‑enabled features accelerating rollouts (Global self‑checkout systems market forecast 2025 (ResearchAndMarkets)).
Still, there's a countermovement - some chains are pulling back amid theft and experience concerns - and post‑pandemic research shows about a third of ANZ shoppers are open to unmanned stores while many still prefer assisted lanes, so retailers must balance throughput, shrink reduction and human connection when redesigning roles (Post‑pandemic shift toward unmanned stores (Supermarket News NZ)).
The bottom line: tills may get smarter, but the most resilient staff will be those who move from scanning to helping, loss‑prevention and experience roles.
Metric | Figure | Source |
---|---|---|
Central Christchurch New World self‑service use | >50% of transactions | 1News |
Foodstuffs store purchases via self‑service | ~25% | 1News |
Self‑checkout market (2025) / CAGR (2025–2030) | USD 5.84B; 13.68% | ResearchAndMarkets |
“We'll have supermarkets that'll have no staff at all. We'll interact with AI, and we'll say into the app 'Isn't this on special for 9.99?'” - Jarrod Haar, Professor of Management, Massey University
Inventory clerks / stock pickers (in-store and micro-fulfilment) - robotics and predictive replenishment
(Up)Inventory clerks and in‑store stock pickers in Aotearoa are facing a fast, practical shift as Autonomous Mobile Robots (AMRs), goods‑to‑person systems and smarter orchestration move replenishment and picking from people to predictable, software‑driven workflows; local suppliers report an explosion of mobile robot warehouses in NZ and AMRs that run 24/7/365 and “work in the dark” to keep fulfilment humming (Storepro warehouse AMR solutions), while micro‑fulfilment and hub‑and‑spoke models let retailers push stock closer to customers and cut store congestion (Swisslog micro-fulfilment trends (NewsHub)).
On the warehouse floor, AI features such as dynamic pathfinding and Visual SLAM let AMRs reroute around busy zones and adapt to changed racking without new wiring, so a single error‑flag becomes the human task and repetitive lifting becomes the robot's routine (PHS Innovate on AI warehouse automation in Australia & New Zealand).
The “so what?” is simple: roles that mostly moved stock will shrink, but staff who can manage exceptions, quality checks and AI‑orchestration will be the ones retailers need tomorrow - think fewer trolleys to push, more problem‑solving to do, and the odd robot that never takes a tea break.
Metric | Figure / Insight | Source |
---|---|---|
Warehouse picking market (2023 → 2030) | USD 6.69B → USD 15.98B (projected) | NextMSC |
AMR operation benefits | 24/7/365 operation; works in the dark | Storepro |
Micro‑fulfilment / space saving | Hub‑and‑spoke MFCs reduce transport, enable faster delivery | Swisslog / NewsHub |
“We are currently in the process of racking a newly leased warehouse. From the very first enquiry communication with Sam, Storepro have demonstrated the ‘partnership approach' that we value. ... Currently, the project remains on track to meet the expected completion date. I look forward to signing off on a well‑executed project in due course, which to date has been positive experience.” - Michael Van Staden, National Logistics Manager
Sales analysts / merchandising analysts - routine data work replaced by AI analytics
(Up)Sales and merchandising analysts in New Zealand are particularly exposed because the core of their day - cleaning spreadsheets, running forecasts, generating SKU‑level reports and testing promos - can now be automated by AI: NZ case studies show routine purchase‑order checks dropping from two hours to 15 seconds with 98% accuracy, and small business analytics tools saving owners 10+ hours a week (New Zealand AI business case studies on retail automation), while Foodstuffs' AI stock management demonstrates how perishable‑led merchandising can be tightened to cut waste by up to 90%.
Platforms like Shopify map out how generative AI and Sidekick make demand forecasting, product recommendations, dynamic pricing and natural‑language analytics routine rather than bespoke tasks (Shopify generative AI use cases in retail), and NetSuite highlights that around 40% of retail executives already use intelligent automation to speed reporting and improve accuracy (NetSuite report on AI adoption in retail).
The practical so what: analysts who spent mornings reconciling data will need to pivot to model governance, exception handling and storytelling - the judgement calls and narrative skills that AI can't replace - if they want to stay indispensable in Kiwi retail.
Administrative / scheduling / back-office retail assistants - RPA and scheduling AI
(Up)Administrative, scheduling and back‑office retail assistants in Aotearoa are seeing routine, repeatable parts of their jobs taken over by software robots and scheduling AI - everything from timesheet imports and roster assignments to invoice processing and supplier onboarding can be automated, freeing managers from manual churn but putting those routine roles at risk.
The market shows both the scale and the solution: SEEK lists 110 RPA roles across New Zealand, signalling strong local demand for people who build and run these automations (SEEK: Robotic Process Automation jobs in New Zealand), while public sector adverts such as the Te Whatu Ora RPA Developer role spell out the practical skills employers want (Power Automate, Power Apps, AI Builder, API integration and exception handling) so bots behave predictably in real workflows (Te Whatu Ora RPA Developer (Power Platform)).
Quanton reports 24/7 “lights‑out” processing, measurable hours reclaimed and seven‑figure opportunity windows for some programmes - meaning routine back‑office tasks can migrate to bots while humans handle exceptions, governance and customer‑facing issues.
(Quanton: Robotic Process Automation NZ).
The practical takeaway for retail managers: invest in rostering and RPA literacy, reframe job descriptions around exception management and people skills, and lean on local training so staff shift from data entry to supervising the bots that never take a tea break.
Conclusion: How retail workers and managers in New Zealand can adapt and next steps
(Up)Adapting to AI in New Zealand retail is practical, not mystical: focus on targeted upskilling, sensible governance and small technical fixes that deliver quick wins.
Start by using nationally available learning pathways - Callaghan Innovation's practical Callaghan Innovation AI e‑learning modules (NZQA micro‑credentials and short courses) and the broad adoption picture in the Kinetics 2025 AI-driven productivity report show training plus clear use‑cases drive most gains - so fund rostering and data‑cleaning first, not futuristic pilots.
Managers should reframe jobs around exception‑handling, customer empathy and model governance, and give staff time‑bounded courses that teach prompt use and tool supervision; practical bootcamps like Nucamp AI Essentials for Work bootcamp (15 weeks) teach prompt‑writing and applied AI skills that move people from data entry to oversight roles.
Tackle the known barriers - budget limits, data quality and rural connectivity - by combining government support, vendor pilots and cohort training so teams can supervise “always‑on” systems, reduce shrink and keep the human moments that matter.
The immediate next steps for retail leaders: pick one repeatable workflow to automate this quarter, enrol affected staff in a short accredited course, and publish simple governance rules so AI augments work, not erodes livelihoods.
Metric / Offer | Figure / Detail |
---|---|
NZ organisations using AI (2025) | 82% (Kinetics) |
Businesses reporting efficiency gains | 93% (Kinetics) |
Callaghan Innovation Level 8 micro‑credential | 10 weeks; NZQA; $450 |
“AI is a new general-purpose technology that can boost productivity across every sector and create new markets.” - Steven Worrall, Microsoft A/NZ
Frequently Asked Questions
(Up)Which retail jobs in New Zealand are most at risk from AI?
Based on NZ-focused evidence and observable deployments, the top five retail roles most at risk are: 1) customer service / contact-centre agents (routine enquiries automated by chatbots and virtual assistants), 2) point-of-sale cashiers and checkout staff (self-checkout and computer-vision tills), 3) inventory clerks / in-store stock pickers (AMRs, Visual SLAM and micro-fulfilment), 4) sales / merchandising analysts (AI automates routine reporting, forecasting and SKU checks), and 5) administrative / scheduling / back-office assistants (RPA and scheduling AI). Each role is exposed where work is repetitive, rule-based or heavily data-driven.
How widespread is AI adoption in New Zealand retail and what metrics show its impact?
AI adoption is already mainstream in NZ retail: 82% of NZ organisations report using AI and 93% of businesses using it report efficiency gains. Case evidence includes a NZ retailer reporting a 60% efficiency gain and 40% cost savings from automation. Chatbots can handle roughly 30% of contact-centre tasks and virtual assistants can cut enquiries by up to 70%. In stores, some locations show over 50% of transactions done via self-service while Foodstuffs reports around 25% self-scan use. Global markets also reflect this acceleration (self-checkout market ~USD 5.84B in 2025; warehouse picking projected from USD 6.69B to USD 15.98B).
What practical skills should retail workers learn to adapt to AI rather than be displaced?
Workers should shift from routine task execution to oversight, exception management and human-centred skills: prompt-writing and applied AI tool use, model governance and testing, exception handling and quality control, customer empathy and experience design, and basic RPA and workflow skills (eg. Power Automate, API integration, scheduling system oversight). Short, targeted courses (industry bootcamps and NZ micro-credentials) that teach prompt use, supervision of automations and data-cleaning are especially effective.
What immediate steps can retail managers take to protect staff and capture AI gains?
Take practical, low-risk steps: pick one repeatable workflow to automate this quarter; invest in data-cleaning and roster/rostering fixes first; enrol affected staff in short accredited courses on prompt use, RPA and exception handling; publish simple AI governance rules; run vendor pilots in partnership with cohort training; and reframe job descriptions around exception management, loss prevention and customer experience. These moves help capture efficiency gains while preserving higher-value human roles.
Will AI replace most retail jobs in New Zealand?
No - the evidence shows automation will replace routine parts of roles but not most jobs wholesale. Around 7% of firms report AI replacing workers directly, while many organisations use AI to augment staff and boost productivity. The likely outcome is role redefinition: routine tasks migrate to bots and robots, while humans take on supervision, complex judgement, empathy-led customer work and governance responsibilities. Deliberate upskilling and governance determine whether workers are displaced or redeployed.
You may be interested in the following topics as well:
Higher conversion and customer trust come from transparent, tailored deals powered by personalised offers for New Zealand consumers.
Speed up private-label launches with Generative design for private-label products that create concept mockups, palettes and supplier-ready specs in hours instead of weeks.
Ludo Fourrage
Founder and CEO
Ludovic (Ludo) Fourrage is an education industry veteran, named in 2017 as a Learning Technology Leader by Training Magazine. Before founding Nucamp, Ludo spent 18 years at Microsoft where he led innovation in the learning space. As the Senior Director of Digital Learning at this same company, Ludo led the development of the first of its kind 'YouTube for the Enterprise'. More recently, he delivered one of the most successful Corporate MOOC programs in partnership with top business schools and consulting organizations, i.e. INSEAD, Wharton, London Business School, and Accenture, to name a few. With the belief that the right education for everyone is an achievable goal, Ludo leads the nucamp team in the quest to make quality education accessible