Top 10 AI Prompts and Use Cases and in the Financial Services Industry in New Zealand
Last Updated: September 12th 2025

Too Long; Didn't Read:
Practical AI prompts for NZ financial services cover chatbots, fraud detection, risk modelling, KiwiSaver personalisation, claims automation, document processing and governance. Adoption is set to exceed 82% by 2025; KiwiSaver high‑risk share rose ≈10%→>40% (2021–2024); AI could add ~NZD76B to GDP by 2038.
New Zealand's financial sector is fast moving from experiments to real-world AI: regulators and industry alike are mapping the risks and the wins so firms can deploy use cases such as chatbots and virtual assistants, AI-driven fraud detection, risk modelling and KiwiSaver personalisation with confidence.
The Reserve Bank's “Rise of the machines” special topic flags financial‑stability implications and the need for oversight, while the FMA's research digs into current adoption, governance and where firms plan to apply AI next - from faster credit decisions (loan approvals that can move from days to minutes) to automated compliance and document processing.
Recent market studies show adoption surging (over 82% of organisations by 2025 and big‑firm use rising to the high‑60s in 2024), so this Top 10 collection pairs practical prompts with NZ use cases and governance guardrails.
For teams wanting hands‑on prompt skills and workplace AI fluency, consider practical training like Nucamp AI Essentials for Work bootcamp registration to learn promptcraft, tools and real business applications, and read the FMA research on artificial intelligence in New Zealand financial services for the regulatory view.
“We reviewed how AI is currently used in New Zealand financial services and firm's plans for future applications. We sought to understand both the benefits and the risks to inform more oversight.”
Table of Contents
- Methodology - How we selected the top 10 and built example prompts
- Customer Service Chatbots & Virtual Assistants - ASB Bank example
- Regulatory Compliance Drafting & Supervised Document Generation - FMA & PwC New Zealand
- Fraud Detection, AML & Anomaly Investigation - Toyota Finance New Zealand application
- Risk Modelling, Scenario Analysis & Stress Testing - PwC New Zealand use case
- Personalised Investment Advice & Robo‑Advisory - KiwiSaver member guidance
- Underwriting & Claims Automation - Castlepoint Systems example
- Financial Operations Automation & Accounting - Aider and Xero in SME bookkeeping
- Document Processing, OIA Responses & Legal Discovery - Auckland Transport OIA example
- Conversational Agents, Digital Humans & Training - Soul Machines and UneeQ roleplay
- Management Dashboards & Decision Support - Orbica and PwC New Zealand insights
- Conclusion - Getting started safely with AI in NZ financial services
- Frequently Asked Questions
Check out next:
Read real-world Wiise ERP examples that show agentic AI improving finance workflows for New Zealand SMEs.
Methodology - How we selected the top 10 and built example prompts
(Up)To select the Top 10 AI prompts and build realistic examples for New Zealand teams, the process was grounded in the FMA's 2024 sector study: the shortlist focused on use cases the report found in active deployment or imminent use - customer‑facing chatbots and draft communications, fraud and anomaly detection, risk modelling and operational automation - and on the controls the regulator flagged as essential, like data quality, vendor oversight and explainability.
The research drew on responses from 13 finance representatives across asset management, banking, financial advice and insurance (a c.40% response rate noted in commentary), and informed prompt design that tests both business value and governance readiness; prompts were therefore framed to surface outputs that are reliable, contestable and auditable.
Where possible, examples mirror real FMA findings (e.g. nine‑in‑ten users citing customer outcomes and firms planning future customer‑interaction use), and the methodology stayed transparent by aligning prompt scenarios with FMA analysis and legal insights such as those summarised by Lexology.
Read the FMA research and the legal commentary for full context.
“We reviewed how AI is currently used in New Zealand financial services and firm's plans for future applications. We sought to understand both the benefits and the risks to inform more oversight.”
Customer Service Chatbots & Virtual Assistants - ASB Bank example
(Up)Customer service chatbots and virtual assistants can be a practical win for New Zealand banks: when designed with a clear purpose they speed responses, handle volume spikes and let human agents focus on complex cases - exactly what Kiwi customers expect as branches shrink and digital channels grow (New Zealand in-branch banking trends and digital channel growth).
A bank such as ASB could deploy an omnichannel assistant to triage queries, verify customers, and escalate urgent fraud or mortgage cases to specialists, following the design with purpose playbook in Infosys's conversational‑banking guide (Infosys conversational banking guide for chatbot best practices).
Real-world vendor case studies show measurable outcomes - for example, early adopters have reported rapid adoption and high deflection rates (24% user uptake and up to 87% chat deflection in some deployments) - underscoring the so what: fewer routine calls, faster problem resolution and tangible cost savings when governance, data access and escalation paths are built in from day one (Emerj review of chatbots for banking customer service outcomes).
Regulatory Compliance Drafting & Supervised Document Generation - FMA & PwC New Zealand
(Up)Regulatory compliance teams and legal drafters in Aotearoa are already testing supervised document generation to cut repetitive work while keeping humans firmly in the driver's seat: the Parliamentary Counsel Office's R&D with local partners produced clause‑by‑clause explanatory‑note and plain‑language prototypes that show AI can draft useful first passes if prompts are tightly scoped and outputs are reviewed, reworked and hosted with strong data controls (New Zealand Parliamentary Counsel Office AI drafting proof-of-concept).
At the same time, the Ministry for Regulation's work on the Regulatory Standards Bill illustrates how LLMs can rapidly classify very large volumes of feedback - 22,821 discussion‑document submissions were processed and then spot‑checked with a qualitative sample - to help officials meet tight timelines without losing the thread of public sentiment (Regulatory Standards Bill submissions analysis).
These New Zealand projects underline practical guardrails lawyers and regulators should adopt - redact personal data, insist on human‑in‑the‑loop review, log prompt logic and model choices, and treat AI as a co‑pilot rather than a policy maker - to preserve transparency, mana whenua concerns and public trust as compliance drafting scales up (RNZ: How AI is being used to process public submissions in New Zealand); the result can be faster, more consistent drafting without losing the human judgement that gives law its legitimacy.
Metric | Value |
---|---|
Total submissions (discussion document) | 22,821 |
Qualitative sample (share of submissions) | 4.1% |
Share of text covered by sample | 34.4% |
Staff‑reviewed sample size noted | 939 submissions (+605 separately reviewed) |
“As a rule of thumb, having humans in the loop will be the best practice - humans in charge and AI as a co‑pilot.”
Fraud Detection, AML & Anomaly Investigation - Toyota Finance New Zealand application
(Up)For lenders such as Toyota Finance New Zealand, fraud detection and anomaly investigation now sit at the intersection of regulation and machine learning: a risk‑based AML/CFT programme - required by supervisors such as the FMA and RBNZ - starts with a thorough written risk assessment and a fit‑for‑purpose transaction‑monitoring system that flags true threats while keeping false positives manageable.
Modern systems use AI to spot patterns like smurfing
(many small transfers) or rapid layering through newly opened accounts, and they feed alerts into human‑review workflows so suspicious activity reports (SARs) and prescribed transaction reports (PTRs - e.g.
NZ$1,000+ international wires, NZ$10,000+ cash) can be filed promptly and records retained for audit. Practical implementation draws on screening services for PEPs, sanctions and adverse media and on best practice for third‑party oversight; see the FMA guidance on AML/CFT obligations and examples of AML transaction‑monitoring systems for how teams can design, test and tune detection rules in line with supervisory expectations and operational realities.
Risk Modelling, Scenario Analysis & Stress Testing - PwC New Zealand use case
(Up)Risk modelling, scenario analysis and stress testing are where New Zealand firms turn uncertainty into board-ready choices: by strengthening data infrastructure, aligning models with strategic goals and involving senior management, stress tests become forward‑looking tools that translate climate, cyber or geopolitical exposures into capital, liquidity and hedging actions.
PwC's guidance on stress testing stresses these exact levers and why institutions that act now build resilience and clearer decision paths, while PwC New Zealand's Risk Services brings together actuarial, data and model‑governance skills to build, validate and monitor models for banks, insurers and treasury teams exposed to FX, commodity and dairy risks.
The practical gain is memorable - a scenario that once lived in a slide deck can instead trigger a concrete hedging decision or capital buffer before stress hits the balance sheet - shortening the path from insight to action.
For practical frameworks and model‑governance detail see PwC's stress‑testing summary and PwC New Zealand Risk Services.
Scenario analysis metric | Share |
---|---|
Currently perform climate scenario analysis or stress testing | 38% |
Plan to perform soon | 29% |
“Stress testing's importance has surged due to APRA's emphasis on risk management amid global risks like climate change and cyber threats.” Nina Larkin, Partner, PwC Australia
Personalised Investment Advice & Robo‑Advisory - KiwiSaver member guidance
(Up)Personalised robo‑advice is closing New Zealand's retirement‑planning gap by turning simple questionnaires into tailored KiwiSaver plans: local tools such as BetterSaver, kōura Wealth, GoalsGetter (Nikko am) and Milford ask a few focused questions to recommend portfolios, contribution rates and glide‑path adjustments that ordinary Kiwis can understand (see MoneyHub's KiwiSaver digital advice comparison).
That personalisation matters now more than ever because the FMA found the share of KiwiSaver assets in high‑volatility (risk category 5) funds quadrupled - from about 10% in 2021 to over 40% in 2024 - so automated advice that flags risk tolerance and long‑term impact can prevent “set and forget” choices from becoming costly.
Hybrid and AI solutions are scaling advice too: National Capital's pioneers and new ventures like Sevaka aim to automate large shares of routine servicing while embedding compliance checks to keep outputs auditable and safe (read the Investment News coverage).
The practical payoff is concrete - better fund matches, nudges to increase contributions, and cheaper access to advice for people who previously had none - all of which help translate policy shifts (like higher default contribution settings) into better retirement outcomes for most members.
Metric | Value / example |
---|---|
Share in risk category 5 (2021 → 2024) | ≈10% → >40% (FMA) |
Main KiwiSaver digital advice tools | BetterSaver, kōura Wealth, GoalsGetter (Nikko am), Milford (MoneyHub) |
“Our findings show that the increase of the default employee and employer contribution settings could result in retirement funds lasting on average approximately 30% longer than under the pre-Budget 2025 settings for median salary and wage earners who contribute without interruption over a 40-year working life.” - Jane Wrightson, Retirement Commissioner
Underwriting & Claims Automation - Castlepoint Systems example
(Up)Underwriting and claims automation is rapidly turning time‑consuming paperwork into board‑level outcomes for New Zealand insurers: intelligent document processing (OCR + NLP) and rules engines speed FNOL intake, triage claims by severity, and surface key underwriting signals so adjusters and underwriters can act sooner, not later.
Modern platforms extract messy PDFs and handwritten notes, run computer‑vision damage checks, flag fraud patterns and hand off only the complex cases to people - delivering concrete gains such as faster settlements, fewer manual touchpoints and clearer audit trails (see VCA's guide to claims automation).
A vivid, practical payoff is real: some systems can move from approval to payment in as little as 15 seconds after settlement, while enterprise deployments report straight‑through processing rates above 65%, slashing backlog and freeing staff for high‑value work (examples and metrics summarised by DeepOpinion).
For NZ teams, the lesson is pragmatic - pilot IDP on high‑volume claim types, keep humans in the loop for liability calls, and instrument every workflow for explainability and regulatory evidence so automation boosts customer trust as much as efficiency.
Metric | Example value (source) |
---|---|
Claims processing cost reduction | ≈30% (VCA) |
Faster claims resolution | 50–70% faster (VCA) |
Straight‑through processing (STP) | >65% (DeepOpinion) |
Payment latency after approval | ~15 seconds (VCA ClaimPay) |
Financial Operations Automation & Accounting - Aider and Xero in SME bookkeeping
(Up)For New Zealand accountants and SME bookkeepers, pairing Aider with Xero turns routine bookkeeping into a proactive advisory engine: Aider syncs in real time with Xero (practices can connect in under two minutes) and pre‑analyses client data into a colour‑coded dashboard that acts as an early‑warning system - telling firms exactly which clients to call “ASAP” so work shifts from chasing receipts to delivering timely advice.
The platform automates period‑close checklists, flags data‑quality issues, and generates AI‑produced Performance Reports and meeting briefs that make numbers instantly actionable, helping practices scale compliance while offering broader advisory services; see the Aider Xero integration overview and Xero's roundup of AI apps for accountants for examples and setup notes.
Metric | Value |
---|---|
Rating (Aider) | 5.0 out of 5 stars (11 reviews) |
Free trial | 14‑day |
Countries listed | Australia, Canada, New Zealand, United States |
“At client meetings I show them the Performance Report along with their annual accounts, the clients love the visuals, it makes more sense to them. It's all AI generated, and they're like, 'Wow!'” - Jessica Stebbings, Chartered Accountant
Document Processing, OIA Responses & Legal Discovery - Auckland Transport OIA example
(Up)Document processing and OIA-response automation are fast becoming a pragmatic tool for New Zealand public agencies and the financial sector alike: Auckland Transport has applied AI to speed up search, pipeline automation and employee analysis, while the Ministry of Transport's published OIA correspondence shows officials may use AI to help analyse submissions - subject to rules about personal data and transparency - so teams can triage thousands of responses faster and surface themes for policy or compliance reviews.
Local case studies show concrete wins - semantic search and intelligent pipelines improve turnaround, and AT's analytics work has halved batch processing time - so legal teams can move from manual redaction and keyword searches to auditable, human-reviewed summaries that preserve privacy and mana whenua considerations.
For practical reading, see the Ministry's OIA thread on AI use and RNZ's roundup of public agencies adopting AI, and explore AT's Dataiku case study on semantic search and automation for document‑scale workflows.
Metric | Value (source) |
---|---|
Batch file processing time | 4.5+ hrs → 2 hrs (OpenText / AT) |
Video analytics running | 500+ (OpenText / AT) |
Cameras in use | ~200 (OpenText / AT) |
Data extracted | ~1 TB/month (trains); ~8 PB/week (street cameras) (OpenText / AT) |
“We may use an artificial intelligence tool to help us analyse submissions. We will take steps to avoid inputting personal information into any AI tool that is outside our network.”
Conversational Agents, Digital Humans & Training - Soul Machines and UneeQ roleplay
(Up)Digital humans are becoming a pragmatic tool for New Zealand banks and insurers that need high‑quality, scalable roleplay and training: Soul Machines' Experiential AI powers lifelike “Digital Workers” that see, hear, remember and even empathise, so staff can practise negotiations, customer conversations and tricky onboarding scenarios with a responsive, consistent partner rather than a scripted bot - a format that also helps scale frontline coaching and reduce time spent on routine call handling.
The platform is built to sit inside existing workflows (so a simulated call can update CRM records or trigger an escalation), teams can trial Studio and the Digital Workforce quickly, and the company's New Zealand roots (co‑founders and R&D anchored to the University of Auckland and NZ tech leadership) make the tech especially resonant for local firms balancing adoption with trust.
For practical pilots, teams can try a short free trial or run training cohorts where learners spend real practice time - Soul Machines reports average conversations of about 20 minutes, a vivid sign that digital roleplay can feel more like coaching than a checklist.
Item | Detail |
---|---|
Platform | Soul Machines Digital Workforce official website |
Company background | Soul Machines about page - NZ founders & University of Auckland R&D |
Trial | 7‑day free trial (Studio / Digital Workforce) |
Workforce Connect price | $40,000 annually |
Average conversation | ~20 minutes (Soul Machines) |
“The future of AI lies not in manipulating reality, but in enhancing our understanding of it. By focusing on Biological AI, we can create AI systems that are ethical, effective, and truly transformative.”
Management Dashboards & Decision Support - Orbica and PwC New Zealand insights
(Up)Management dashboards and decision‑support tools are the glue that turns messy data into board‑ready choices for New Zealand finance teams: consolidate CRM, ERP and forecasting feeds to present one clear story - so a CFO can see cash, liquidity and key risks in a single slide rather than wrestling with siloed spreadsheets.
Local planning and analytics vendors show this in practice - teams using AI‑enabled planning can cut the financial close from 10 to 3 days and run scenario models in real time (Fusion5 planning and analytics solutions for New Zealand) - while better board reporting practices mean dashboards must be visual, concise and linked to reliable source systems so directors get actionable insight fast (Board reporting best practices - insightsoftware).
The same data pipeline starts at the front line: CRM adoption (including mobile access for field teams) feeds richer customer and operational signals into decision models, so management can move from reactive firefighting to confident, timely strategy calls (Best CRM for New Zealand businesses - Capsule CRM).
A vivid payoff: what once took a week of spreadsheet stitching can now become a single, auditable dashboard that updates in seconds - helping boards act before a small variance becomes a big problem.
Conclusion - Getting started safely with AI in NZ financial services
(Up)Getting started safely in Aotearoa means marrying ambition with discipline: run small, measurable pilots, embed humans in the loop, log model choices and data lineage, and treat governance as a product not an afterthought - a core takeaway from the FMA's sector review of AI use and risks in New Zealand financial services (FMA sector review of AI in New Zealand financial services).
The Government's July 2025 AI Strategy and its Responsible AI Guidance offer a light‑touch, risk‑based framework that encourages firms to adopt proven tools while safeguarding privacy, explainability and competition - and notes AI could add roughly NZD76 billion to GDP by 2038 if adopted responsibly, a vivid reminder of the upside for firms that get governance right (New Zealand AI Strategy and Responsible AI Guidance (July 2025)).
Practical next steps: pick a high‑value, low‑risk use case; document impact, controls and escalation; engage legal and risk early; and upskill teams with workplace courses such as the Nucamp AI Essentials for Work bootcamp - practical AI skills for the workplace so promptcraft and auditability become routine.
Course | Length | Early bird cost | Registration |
---|---|---|---|
AI Essentials for Work | 15 Weeks | $3,582 | Register for Nucamp AI Essentials for Work (15-week bootcamp) |
“We reviewed how AI is currently used in New Zealand financial services and firm's plans for future applications. We sought to understand both the benefits and the risks to inform more oversight.”
Frequently Asked Questions
(Up)What are the top AI use cases for financial services in New Zealand?
The article highlights ten practical AI use cases: 1) Customer service chatbots & virtual assistants (eg. ASB omnichannel assistants), 2) Regulatory compliance drafting & supervised document generation (Parliamentary Counsel Office, Ministry for Regulation), 3) Fraud detection, AML & anomaly investigation (Toyota Finance NZ), 4) Risk modelling, scenario analysis & stress testing (PwC NZ), 5) Personalised investment advice & robo‑advisory (KiwiSaver tools such as BetterSaver, kōura Wealth, GoalsGetter, Milford), 6) Underwriting & claims automation (Castlepoint Systems), 7) Financial operations automation & accounting (Aider + Xero for SMEs), 8) Document processing & OIA responses (Auckland Transport example), 9) Conversational agents & digital humans (Soul Machines, UneeQ), and 10) Management dashboards & decision support (Orbica, PwC). Each is paired with local examples, governance guardrails and measurable outcomes in the NZ context.
What regulatory and governance safeguards should NZ financial firms adopt when deploying AI?
Firms should follow a risk‑based approach: keep humans in the loop, log prompt logic and model choices, maintain data lineage and quality, redact personal data before external model use, enforce vendor and third‑party oversight, require explainability and audit trails, and ensure human review for supervised document generation. This aligns with RBNZ and FMA concerns (eg. RBNZ's financial stability focus and the FMA's sector study) and with legal commentary recommending AI as a co‑pilot rather than an autonomous decision maker.
What measurable benefits and adoption metrics have been observed or forecast for NZ financial services?
Recent studies and case examples show rapid adoption and clear benefits: overall AI adoption is forecast to exceed ~82% of organisations by 2025 with big‑firm use in the high‑60s in 2024; chatbots have reported ~24% user uptake and up to 87% chat deflection in some deployments; claims automation metrics include ≈30% cost reduction, 50–70% faster resolution and straight‑through processing above 65%; KiwiSaver assets in high‑volatility funds rose from ≈10% (2021) to >40% (2024), increasing the need for personalised advice; NZ‑wide responsible adoption could add ~NZD 76 billion to GDP by 2038.
How should a New Zealand firm get started with AI pilots and building workplace capability?
Practical next steps: choose a high‑value, low‑risk use case; run small, measurable pilots; document expected impact, controls and escalation paths; engage legal and risk early; embed humans in the loop and instrument for explainability and auditability; and upskill teams with workplace training (for example, the referenced AI Essentials for Work course: 15 weeks, early bird cost listed at ~$3,582). Emphasise logging, testing and vendor oversight from day one.
Which NZ‑specific compliance thresholds, case metrics and examples should teams be aware of?
Key NZ points from the article: AML/transaction reporting thresholds referenced include NZ$1,000+ international wires and NZ$10,000+ cash when filing prescribed transaction reports; the Ministry for Regulation processed 22,821 discussion‑document submissions using LLM classification with a qualitative sample representing 4.1% of submissions (covering ~34.4% of text) and 939 staff‑reviewed items; Auckland Transport reduced a batch file processing job from 4.5+ hours to ~2 hours using semantic search pipelines; document and data‑volume examples include ~1 TB/month (trains) and ~8 PB/week (street cameras) in transport analytics - illustrating scale and privacy considerations for public‑sector and financial deployments.
You may be interested in the following topics as well:
Find out how chatbots, robo-advice and personalised nudges lower call-centre volumes while boosting KiwiSaver engagement.
Upskill into chatbot performance monitoring to supervise AI systems instead of competing with them for basic support work.
Ludo Fourrage
Founder and CEO
Ludovic (Ludo) Fourrage is an education industry veteran, named in 2017 as a Learning Technology Leader by Training Magazine. Before founding Nucamp, Ludo spent 18 years at Microsoft where he led innovation in the learning space. As the Senior Director of Digital Learning at this same company, Ludo led the development of the first of its kind 'YouTube for the Enterprise'. More recently, he delivered one of the most successful Corporate MOOC programs in partnership with top business schools and consulting organizations, i.e. INSEAD, Wharton, London Business School, and Accenture, to name a few. With the belief that the right education for everyone is an achievable goal, Ludo leads the nucamp team in the quest to make quality education accessible