Top 10 AI Tools Every Legal Professional in Italy Should Know in 2025
Last Updated: September 8th 2025

Too Long; Didn't Read:
Top 10 AI tools Italian legal professionals should know in 2025 (CoCounsel, Lexis+, Harvey, Spellbook, Ironclad, Relativity, Clio Duo, Diligen, Lex Machina, LawDroid). Large firms' AI adoption 63%, only 8.2% enterprises use AI; Minsait estimates €115 billion productivity uplift. Run DPIAs, confirm data residency, pilot and train staff.
For legal professionals in Italy in 2025, artificial intelligence is both an opportunity and a source of legal complexity: large firms are racing ahead - 63% of big companies have adopted or plan to adopt AI - yet national adoption remains uneven, with only about 8.2% of enterprises using AI, exposing a yawning SME skills gap and regulatory pressure on lawyers to advise on data, IP and compliance (Minsait artificial intelligence Italy 2025 adoption report, Italy 2025 Digital Decade country report).
The upside is tangible - Minsait estimates a potential €115 billion productivity gain - so Italian litigators, in‑house counsel and compliance teams must quickly pair legal expertise with practical AI know‑how; targeted short courses like the AI Essentials for Work bootcamp (Nucamp) teach usable prompts, workflows and risk controls that help turn uncertainty into strategic advantage.
Metric | Value |
---|---|
Large company AI adoption (2025) | 63% |
Enterprises using AI | 8.2% |
Potential productivity uplift | €115 billion |
“This transformation is happening now.”
Table of Contents
- Methodology - How this Top 10 was selected
- CoCounsel (Casetext / Thomson Reuters) - AI legal research & document review
- Lexis+ AI (LexisNexis) - Conversational, citation-backed research and analytics
- Harvey AI - Enterprise legal workflows and secure document analysis
- Spellbook - Contract drafting and redlining inside Microsoft Word
- Ironclad - Contract lifecycle management for in-house teams
- Relativity - Enterprise eDiscovery and large-scale document review
- Clio Duo (Clio) - AI inside practice management for small-to-mid firms
- Diligen - ML contract and document analysis for due diligence
- Lex Machina - Litigation analytics and court-data insights
- LawDroid - AI chatbots and virtual reception for intake and qualification
- Conclusion - Practical next steps and safeguards for Italian legal teams
- Frequently Asked Questions
Check out next:
Protect your firm by understanding IP, copyright and deepfake risks when generating or using AI‑created evidence and client content.
Methodology - How this Top 10 was selected
(Up)Selection for this Top 10 combined Italian market signals with rigorous, workflow‑focused evaluation: the domestic ecosystem (tracked by Legal Tech Italy's observatory and Legal Tech Forum) and vendor maps helped identify home‑grown and Europe‑ready contenders, while comparative lists like the Top 100 Legal AI Companies in Italy guided breadth and local fit; see Legal Tech Italy for the ecosystem view.
Tools were then scored against practical, lawyer‑centric criteria drawn from leading guidance - benchmarks and workflow tests recommended by DLA Piper (eg. clause extraction, OCR on scanned documents and even linking obligations to cadastral plans), data‑security and model‑training policies, integration with existing IT (MS Word, Clio/CaseMgmt) and clear ROI/total‑cost assumptions.
Emphasis was placed on measurable accuracy thresholds, a sandbox pilot phase, and governance (human supervision and data residency) so firms can choose a mode from “AI‑support” to “AI‑centric” depending on case complexity.
This methodology blends Italian market intelligence with technical, legal and operational checkpoints to keep selection practical for in‑house, boutique and mid‑size Italian practices.
Evaluation Pillar | What was measured |
---|---|
Core functionality | Research, contract review, eDiscovery, intake fit |
Security & privacy | Encryption, data residency, training-use policies |
Integration & UX | MS Word, case management, sandbox adoption |
Benchmarks & accuracy | Clause extraction, OCR, citation/verifiability |
Value & governance | ROI, pilot metrics, human supervision model |
“AI alone doesn't provide value – it only generates it in the context of a well-designed process.”
CoCounsel (Casetext / Thomson Reuters) - AI legal research & document review
(Up)CoCounsel Legal from Thomson Reuters is a heavyweight option for Italian firms and in‑house teams that need fast, verifiable legal research and high‑volume document review: built on Westlaw and Practical Law, it stitches Deep Research, agentic multi‑step workflows and Microsoft 365/DMS integrations into a single flow so teams can move from case strategy to drafting and clause‑level comparison without switching apps (CoCounsel Legal product page (Thomson Reuters)).
The platform's Knowledge Search promises to surface firm knowledge across repositories (HighQ, iManage, SharePoint), which matters in Italy where messy internal archives often slow due diligence, and early case studies report dramatic time savings - tasks that once took an hour can fall to five minutes - while agentic workflows hand lawyers structured research plans rather than just chatty answers (Dewey B Strategic analysis of CoCounsel's agentic AI).
That said, CoCounsel's reliance on authoritative sources and enterprise security helps reduce hallucination risk, but Italian practitioners should still verify citations and fit the tool into formal governance and data‑residency checks before production use.
Metric | Value |
---|---|
Document review / drafting speed | 2.6x |
Users finding more key information | 85% |
Revenue growth likelihood with AI strategy | 2x |
“The AI-generated summary of results above the list of primary law authority can be extraordinarily useful for getting an overview of the issues and pointers to primary authority, but it should never be used to advise a client, write a brief or motion for a court, or otherwise be relied on without doing further research. Use it to accelerate thorough research. Don't use it as a replacement for thorough research.”
Lexis+ AI (LexisNexis) - Conversational, citation-backed research and analytics
(Up)Lexis+ AI brings conversational, citation-backed research and practical drafting tools that matter to Italian legal teams evaluating AI: Protégé - its personalized assistant - combines LexisNexis' authoritative library with DMS connectivity (iManage, SharePoint) to surface linked citations, run Shepard's checks and produce first drafts, timelines and brief analyses that can cut research timelines by over 50% in real-world reviews; for a deep look at features and security, see the official LexisNexis Lexis+ AI official product page, and for independent coverage of the launch and linked citations see the industry analysis at Dewey B Strategic industry analysis of the Lexis+ AI launch and linked citations.
Italian firms should value the platform's private, multi-model approach, Vault for secure document analysis, and Azure/AWS-backed infrastructure, but must still confirm retention, encryption and governance policies before integrating client data into workflows.
Metric | Value |
---|---|
Forrester ROI - Law firms (3 years) | 344% |
Forrester ROI - Corporate legal (3 years) | 284% |
Protégé Vaults | Up to 50 Vaults |
Documents per Vault | 1–500 |
Uploads purged at session end (non-Vault) | Up to 10 documents |
Vault results retained in history | 90 days |
“This is a moment unlike any we've seen in the legal industry, and we are delighted to deliver generative AI that will safely and securely accelerate our customers' success.”
Harvey AI - Enterprise legal workflows and secure document analysis
(Up)For Italian legal teams thinking beyond point solutions, Harvey positions itself as an enterprise-grade platform that turns firm know‑how into reusable, auditable workflows - Workflow Builder lets IT and practice leads encode templates, approval logic and tone so firm processes travel with the work and not just the person.
Deployable via Microsoft Azure with data‑residency controls, SOC 2/ISO 27001 certifications and explicit policies that the platform “is never trained on customer data,” Harvey targets the compliance and privacy concerns that matter in Italy (GDPR, client confidentiality) while offering white‑glove onboarding and 24/7 support for complex rollouts.
Its agentic, multi‑model workflows promise human‑level performance on structured drafting, extraction and analysis, and integrations with trusted legal content (now being extended via a LexisNexis alliance for citation‑backed answers) make outputs easier to verify - a useful guardrail for firms that must show provenance in court or in regulatory reviews.
Big‑firm pilots have stress‑tested the system at scale (Allen & Overy ran tens of thousands of questions), showing how Harvey can free lawyers from manual drudgery while keeping IT controls front and centre.
Metric | Value |
---|---|
Clients / Reach | 335+ clients in 45+ countries |
Security & Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, GDPR-compliant; data residency controls |
Deployment | Azure Marketplace; enterprise integrations and white-glove onboarding |
“Agents are the means; workflows are the ends.”
Spellbook - Contract drafting and redlining inside Microsoft Word
(Up)Spellbook brings AI drafting and redlining straight into Microsoft Word so transactional teams can draft, compare and negotiate contracts without leaving the document - the product promises to “draft and review 10x faster” and now runs GPT‑5 to speed clause generation, redlines and plain‑language summaries (see Spellbook AI contract drafting product page).
For Italian legal teams worried about privacy and compliance, Spellbook advertises SOC 2 Type II, GDPR and Zero Data Retention agreements, and features like Playbooks and the new Library/Smart Clause Drafting that index a firm's own precedents so lawyers can pull tailored clauses instantly rather than “pause for a 10‑minute folder hunt” (read the LawNext: Spellbook Library & Smart Clause Drafting announcement).
Practical perks matter in practice: edits appear under the lawyer's name for easy client delivery, bulk‑approve saves negotiation hours, and Playbooks let firms encode review preferences into repeatable workflows.
For firms evaluating Word add‑ins, Spellbook is worth testing in a sandbox to verify governance, data handling and fit with Italian IT policies; book a demo or start the 7‑day trial to pilot real documents.
Spellbook AI contract drafting product page | LawNext: Spellbook Library & Smart Clause Drafting announcement
Feature | Notes |
---|---|
Works in | Microsoft Word (add‑in) |
Models | GPT‑5 live in Spellbook |
Security & Privacy | SOC 2 Type II; GDPR; Zero Data Retention |
Users / Reach | 3,600+ legal teams |
Trial | 7‑day free trial / demo |
“I love Spellbook. I use it every day. It saves me at least one hour, sometimes two hours, a day.”
Ironclad - Contract lifecycle management for in-house teams
(Up)Ironclad is a strong CLM candidate for Italian in‑house teams that need end‑to‑end contract control tied to existing IT - its Ironclad AI can detect clause types and contract properties (including Governing Law) and can ingest large archives with Smart Import (up to 2,000 files at a time) while offering full‑text OCR for searchable repositories; see the Ironclad AI overview for the feature set and supported properties (Ironclad AI Overview).
Practical IT workstreams in Italy will value entity tagging (AI suggestions match parties and contacts to your entity profiles) and configurable AI Playbooks that enforce preferred language during redlines (Use AI Suggestions to Tag Entities on Records), but real‑world testing shows limits: migrations can save weeks yet often require cleanup - independent evaluation found roughly one in five imports needed manual fixes, a reminder to pilot with live Italian contracts and native‑law clauses before rolling into production (Ironclad week‑long review).
For IT teams, the choice is pragmatic: strong automation and analytics, but expect a governance, QA and mapping phase to prevent noisy metadata from undermining downstream compliance and reporting.
Metric | Value |
---|---|
Contracts processed (training data) | Over 1 billion |
Smart Import max files | Up to 2,000 files |
Reported metadata extraction errors (review) | ≈20% requiring manual correction |
“SmartImport is incomplete… 20% wrong. Training materials out of date.”
Relativity - Enterprise eDiscovery and large-scale document review
(Up)RelativityOne is the enterprise e‑discovery workhorse that Italian legal and IT teams should put on their short‑list: a secure, cloud‑based platform that ingests ESI from Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, Slack and even ChatGPT Enterprise, automatically processes large archives at scale, and accelerates review with analytics, predictive coding and transcription so hours of audio and video become searchable, review‑ready text and chats appear in conversational context (RelativityOne eDiscovery platform for legal teams).
Its Relativity aiR capability layers generative AI on familiar TAR workflows - surfacing likely‑relevant documents, highlighting supporting citations, offering written rationales and confidence scores - so teams can defend a protocol rather than a black box (Relativity aiR and TAR: The New Review blog post).
For Italian firms, the practical takeaway is tactical: pilot aiR on non‑critical matters, validate precision/recall against your precedents, and confirm retention, encryption and governance to keep GDPR, discovery defensibility and IT controls aligned while dramatically cutting review hours and surfacing the truly material evidence.
"It's the best Review platform and analytics tool that I have used, with full customization capabilities. Love it."
Clio Duo (Clio) - AI inside practice management for small-to-mid firms
(Up)Clio Duo brings AI directly into the practice‑management layer most small‑to‑mid Italian firms already use, embedding GPT‑4 via Azure OpenAI inside Clio Manage so teams can pull matter summaries, draft client replies, create tasks and time entries, and run document analysis without leaving the case file - its Document Analyzer can handle up to 25 DOCX/PDF/TXT files in one pass and will extract timelines, parties, dollar amounts and cited snippets that link back to the source text.
For IT and compliance teams in Italy the practical benefits are clear: Duo respects Clio permissions, writes actions into the event log for auditability, and includes regional handling notes so firms should confirm data‑residency and network/VPN policies before enabling the add‑on.
Used as a governed pilot it turns routine admin work and intake into a measurable productivity play (faster client catch‑ups, fewer missed billing opportunities) while keeping lawyers in charge of accuracy and ethics; see Clio's overview of Duo and the vendor's Get Started guidance to map a safe rollout for GDPR and local IT requirements.
For cash‑strapped firms wanting to scale without headcount, Duo is a low‑friction place to start.
“Clio Duo makes it much easier to find key information, such as billing and month-to-month comparisons, helping me gain a better understanding of my practice's growth.”
Diligen - ML contract and document analysis for due diligence
(Up)Diligen is a pragmatic ML-powered contract-review platform that Italian law firms, in‑house teams and IT managers should consider for due diligence and high-volume contract work: it automatically identifies hundreds of clause types, OCRs scanned PDFs, lets reviewers jump to a specific provision with one click, and exports customizable due‑diligence reports into Word or Excel for streamlined handoff to partners or compliance teams (Diligen contract-review platform product page).
The product is built for scale - “whether you have 50 contracts or 500,000” - and includes a user-friendly self‑training workflow (Prodigy) so local teams can teach bespoke Italian clauses quickly (the vendor recommends ~30 examples to seed a new concept) rather than waiting months for model tuning; see the Prodigy launch and demo notes for technical details and workflow examples (Diligen Prodigy self-training launch and demo notes).
Practical IT takeaways: expect tight integrations (Box/NetDocuments/Clio), fast project ramp‑up for M&A, NDAs and privacy reviews, and a sensible pilot path to validate precision on native‑law contracts before full production rollout.
Capability | Detail |
---|---|
Pre‑trained clause models | Hundreds |
Scalability | 50 to 500,000 contracts |
Provision types auto‑identified | 200+ |
Export formats | Word, Excel (custom reports) |
Integrations | Box, NetDocuments, Clio |
“Every single data point will update the ML model.”
Lex Machina - Litigation analytics and court-data insights
(Up)Lex Machina and its peers turn courtroom history into a practical playbook for Italian litigators and IT teams: by surfacing judge tendencies, court timelines, damages and opposing‑counsel patterns, these analytics platforms help set client expectations, pick venues and tailor motions with data rather than guesswork.
For firms operating in Italy the real win is integration - feed analytics into case management and DMS systems, combine public court signals with your firm's precedents, and run small pilots to validate precision against native‑law contracts and local dockets before full rollout.
Tools such as Westlaw Edge and Lexis+ show how judge and court profiles (timing, grant rates, cited authorities) translate into tactical choices, while API‑first providers can help IT teams normalise and enrich feeds for in‑house dashboards; see Westlaw Edge Litigation Analytics and Lexis+ Litigation Analytics for examples of judge‑level insight and coverage.
Treat analytics as an evidence layer: it narrows the field from “what might happen” to a defensible, data‑backed recommendation that lawyers can explain to clients - because in litigation, a pattern is often the difference between settling and winning.
“To have this analytical information integrated within Westlaw Edge is a game changer.”
LawDroid - AI chatbots and virtual reception for intake and qualification
(Up)For Italian firms that want to turn website visitors into vetted matters without adding headcount, LawDroid offers a pragmatic intake layer: no‑code Builder and Copilot chatbots greet visitors with video and responsive conversation, run 24/7 consultations that can “double the leads,” and hand off qualified prospects to a live virtual receptionist or calendar booking so teams don't miss the moment when two‑thirds of potential clients decide whether to hire you (speed matters).
The platform also automates document templating, captures structured intake data for CRM/case‑management workflows, and surfaces analytics to prioritise follow‑ups - making it an attractive option for solos and small firms that need tight IT integration.
Italian IT and compliance teams should pilot LawDroid in a sandbox, verify retention and encryption practices, and confirm smooth syncing with their case management system before production.
See the LawDroid Copilot overview and the LawDroid Copilot chatbot rollout guide for rollout ideas and intake best practices.
“I was going to hire a paralegal, but after trying out LawDroid Copilot, I now have the help I need.”
Conclusion - Practical next steps and safeguards for Italian legal teams
(Up)Practical next steps for Italian legal teams: treat AI projects as regulated IT rollouts - map which tools are high‑risk under the AI Act, run a DPIA for any system touching sensitive or health data, and pilot in a sandbox while insisting vendors prove data‑residency, retention and training‑use policies so client data never becomes exposure (see the AI Act summary for Italy Global Legal Insights - AI, ML & Big Data Laws 2025: Italy).
Learn from enforcement: Italy's decisive action against DeepSeek and high‑profile privacy penalties (including a €15M fine involving ChatGPT) show regulators will act fast, so require contractual audit rights, SOC 2/GDPR commitments and an escalation path before production use (DeepSeek case - data sovereignty and GDPR enforcement analysis).
Finally, invest in people and process - mandated AI literacy and board‑level governance mean trained teams are a defence; short, practical courses such as the AI Essentials for Work bootcamp help lawyers turn prompts and governance into repeatable, auditable workflows (Nucamp AI Essentials for Work bootcamp - registration and course details).
Immediate action | Why it matters |
---|---|
Run DPIAs for high‑risk systems | AI Act/GDPR require risk assessment for sensitive processing |
Verify data residency & vendor controls | Garante enforcement and data‑sovereignty cases block non‑compliant services |
Pilot in sandbox + human oversight | Limits exposure, tests precision and governance before production |
Train staff on AI literacy | AI Act and national guidance expect informed human oversight and board competence |
Frequently Asked Questions
(Up)Which AI tools made the "Top 10 AI Tools Every Legal Professional in Italy Should Know in 2025" list?
The article highlights 10 practical tools for Italian legal teams in 2025: CoCounsel (Casetext / Thomson Reuters), Lexis+ AI (LexisNexis), Harvey AI, Spellbook, Ironclad, Relativity (RelativityOne), Clio Duo (Clio), Diligen, Lex Machina, and LawDroid. Each maps to common legal workflows - legal research & document review, contract drafting and CLM, eDiscovery, practice management, due diligence, litigation analytics, and client intake/chatbots - and should be evaluated for fit, integration and governance before rollout.
What are the key market and impact metrics Italian legal professionals should know for 2025?
Key data points from the article: 63% of large companies have adopted or plan to adopt AI (2025), while only about 8.2% of enterprises are currently using AI, showing uneven uptake and an SME skills gap. Minsait estimates a potential productivity uplift of approximately €115 billion. These figures underline both the opportunity and the urgency for firms to build AI capability, governance and measurable pilots.
How was the Top 10 list selected - what methodology and evaluation criteria were used?
Selection combined Italian market signals (Legal Tech Italy, Legal Tech Forum) and vendor mapping with workflow‑focused testing. Tools were scored against lawyer‑centric criteria: core functionality (research, contract review, eDiscovery, intake), security & privacy (encryption, data residency, training-use policies), integration & UX (MS Word, case management, sandbox adoption), benchmarks & accuracy (clause extraction, OCR, citation/verifiability), and value & governance (ROI, pilot metrics, human supervision). Emphasis was placed on measurable accuracy thresholds, sandbox pilots and governance modes from “AI‑support” to “AI‑centric.”
What security, privacy and regulatory safeguards should Italian firms require before deploying legal AI?
Before production use, run a DPIA for systems processing sensitive data, map AI Act risk categories, and confirm GDPR compliance. Require vendor commitments on data residency, retention and training‑use policies, SOC 2/ISO 27001 (or equivalent) certifications, contractual audit rights and an escalation path. Pilot in a sandbox with human‑in‑the‑loop review, log actions for auditability, and ensure encryption and documented governance to reduce hallucination and compliance risk. Italy's enforcement history (including large fines) makes these controls essential.
How should a firm pilot and operationalize AI to capture value while limiting risk?
Start with small, measurable pilots in a sandbox and define success metrics (e.g., clause extraction accuracy, OCR reliability, time savings, ROI). Validate precision/recall against firm precedents, test integrations (Word, DMS, case management), and map a human supervision model. Use playbooks or workflows to encode review rules, require vendor proof of data controls, and invest in AI literacy training for staff and board governance. Iterate from “AI‑support” (assistive tools) to “AI‑centric” (end‑to‑end automation) only after achieving pilot thresholds and governance sign‑off.
You may be interested in the following topics as well:
Understand the practical risks from Italian DPA enforcement that should shape your privacy practice in 2025.
Cut review time by flagging risky language and suggesting redlines with our Automated clause-by-clause review prompt for Italian contracts.
Ludo Fourrage
Founder and CEO
Ludovic (Ludo) Fourrage is an education industry veteran, named in 2017 as a Learning Technology Leader by Training Magazine. Before founding Nucamp, Ludo spent 18 years at Microsoft where he led innovation in the learning space. As the Senior Director of Digital Learning at this same company, Ludo led the development of the first of its kind 'YouTube for the Enterprise'. More recently, he delivered one of the most successful Corporate MOOC programs in partnership with top business schools and consulting organizations, i.e. INSEAD, Wharton, London Business School, and Accenture, to name a few. With the belief that the right education for everyone is an achievable goal, Ludo leads the nucamp team in the quest to make quality education accessible