Top 5 Jobs in Government That Are Most at Risk from AI in Durham - And How to Adapt
Last Updated: August 17th 2025
Too Long; Didn't Read:
Durham's 12‑week OpenAI pilot found 30–60 minutes saved per staffer daily and uncovered “millions of dollars” in unclaimed property. Top at‑risk government roles: administrative clerks, bookkeeping, records/data entry, mail delivery, and paralegals - reskill into prompt design, AI validation, and oversight.
Durham's role in North Carolina's March 2025 OpenAI pilot makes the local stakes clear: a 12-week program announced in Durham demonstrated practical gains - preliminary analysis identified “millions of dollars” in potential unclaimed property and a subsequent review reported average time savings of 30–60 minutes per day - meaning routine administrative tasks in municipal offices are prime targets for AI-driven efficiency, not wholesale replacement; the pilot (run with NCCU and limited to publicly available data) highlights why Durham government workers should reskill in prompt-writing, safe-use practices, and AI oversight, starting with hands-on courses like the North Carolina Treasurer and OpenAI pilot announcement findings and practical training such as Nucamp's AI Essentials for Work bootcamp (15-week practical AI for the workplace).
| Program | Details |
|---|---|
| Program Name | AI Essentials for Work |
| Length | 15 Weeks |
| Courses Included | AI at Work: Foundations; Writing AI Prompts; Job Based Practical AI Skills |
| Cost (early bird) | $3,582 |
| Syllabus | AI Essentials for Work syllabus (15-week course) |
| Registration | Register for AI Essentials for Work (15-week) |
“Innovation, particularly around data and technology, will allow our department to deliver better results for North Carolina. I am grateful to our friends at OpenAI for partnering with us on this new endeavor, and I am excited to explore the possibilities ahead.” - Brad Briner
Table of Contents
- Methodology: how we identified the top 5 at-risk jobs in Durham
- Administrative/Office Clerks and Secretaries
- Bookkeeping, Accounting, and Auditing Clerks
- Records and Data Processing Roles (Records Clerks, Data Entry Specialists, Permit Processing Staff)
- Mail/Parcel and Routine Field Delivery Positions (Postal Service Mail Carriers and Municipal Delivery Staff)
- Paralegals and Routine Legal/Compliance Review Roles
- Conclusion: Action roadmap for Durham government workers and agencies
- Frequently Asked Questions
Check out next:
Compare cloud, hybrid, and on-prem infrastructure options for Durham government to balance performance, cost, and security.
Methodology: how we identified the top 5 at-risk jobs in Durham
(Up)The top-five at-risk list for Durham was built by combining rigorous occupational exposure scores with local employment patterns: LMI Institute/O*NET-based automation scores (ranked 1–10 for least-to-most exposed) were matched to Bureau of Labor Statistics OEWS employment shares to weight how common each occupation is locally, while regional analyses - like the ncIMPACT workplace disruption report (UNC SOG) finding that the Durham–Chapel Hill MSA has a 26.1% share of workers in occupations with high automation exposure - helped focus the assessment on Durham's labor market; localized risk checks and prevalence counts were then cross-referenced with state-level spot studies (for example, a county-focused ranking of NC's top-100 jobs and their AI risk) to ensure the final list reflects both susceptibility (routine, repeatable tasks) and workforce size, rather than technical novelty alone.
See the ncIMPACT regional exposure methodology for context and the BetCarolina North Carolina job AI risk analysis for supporting data.
| Data source | Role in methodology |
|---|---|
| ncIMPACT workplace disruption report (UNC SOG) | Regional exposure context; metro share (e.g., Durham–Chapel Hill 26.1% high exposure) |
| BetCarolina North Carolina job AI risk analysis | Top-100 NC job counts and local risk cross-checks |
| LMI Institute / O*NET / OEWS | Automation exposure scores (1–10) weighted by OEWS employment to produce occupation-level vulnerability |
Administrative/Office Clerks and Secretaries
(Up)Administrative and clerical roles - city clerks, office secretaries, receptionists - are especially exposed in Durham because AI already handles the core tasks those jobs perform: meeting minutes, records custody, routine correspondence, scheduling, and permit processing.
Local examples matter: the Durham City Clerk's office oversees a six‑person team and explicitly lists preparing minutes, maintaining official records, processing ordinances, and managing public records requests as everyday duties (Durham City Clerk job description on GovernmentJobs.com), while recent analyses put roughly 46% of administrative tasks in the high-automation zone - meaning much of the day-to-day work can be accelerated or automated (Study: 46% of administrative tasks are highly automatable).
So what: Durham pilots have already shown 30–60 minutes saved per staffer per day on routine work, which creates a clear pivot point - retrain to become AI supervisors and records auditors rather than be replaced; practical reskilling options and local workforce programs (for example, Research Triangle reskilling and Nucamp offerings) can convert those efficiency gains into new, higher‑value duties (Research Triangle workforce reskilling and coding bootcamps).
| Durham City Clerk (example) | Details |
|---|---|
| Salary range | $83,000 - $124,000 annually |
| Staff supervised | Office of six |
| Core duties | Prepare minutes; maintain official records; process ordinances; handle public records requests |
Bookkeeping, Accounting, and Auditing Clerks
(Up)Bookkeeping, accounting, and auditing clerks in Durham should view the DST/OpenAI pilot as a practical warning and a playbook: the 12‑week trial showed generative AI can speed analysis of financial statements, spot inconsistencies in data sets, and shrink a 90‑minute audit request review to one‑third the time - producing average daily time savings of 30–60 minutes and early productivity gains near 10% - which means routine reconciliation, standard reporting, and first‑pass audit work are now highly automatable but still demand human oversight.
So what: rather than being simply displaced, local finance clerks can capture those efficiency gains by upskilling into prompt design, AI validation, and exception‑driven analysis roles that verify outputs, resolve edge cases, and manage compliance.
Caveats from the pilot matter - AI can hallucinate and requires due diligence - so adoption should follow the DST OpenAI pilot findings and independent NCCU evaluation (North Carolina State Treasurer OpenAI pilot report) and the newsroom summary of time‑savings and limits (newsroom summary: independent study showing 30–60 minutes saved per day); local reskilling programs in the Research Triangle can convert those freed hours into higher‑value auditing and oversight work (Research Triangle workforce reskilling programs for government workers).
“This technology saves a material amount of time.” - Brad Briner
Records and Data Processing Roles (Records Clerks, Data Entry Specialists, Permit Processing Staff)
(Up)Records clerks, data‑entry specialists, and permit processors in Durham face especially high exposure because machine learning and OCR now automate the core chore they perform - extracting fields, validating formats, and routing rows into automated pipelines - so routine keying and batch file processing can be replaced or sharply accelerated.
The industry analysis that ranks Data Entry Clerks among the top jobs at risk emphasizes the same mechanics (ML + OCR + automated data pipelines) and recommends shifting into higher‑value tasks like exception handling, data validation, and analytic reporting; practical reskilling paths include Excel, SQL, and Python for working with structured data (VKTR analysis: 10 Jobs Most at Risk of AI - Data Entry Clerks).
For Durham workers, the concrete pivot is clear: turn hours saved from automation into roles that audit AI outputs and manage edge cases - local programs in the Research Triangle can help with that transition (Research Triangle workforce reskilling programs for Durham government workers), and county leaders should adopt responsible standards such as the NCDIT AI Framework when deploying these tools (NCDIT AI Framework for Responsible AI Use in Government) - so what: mastering validation and exception workflows is the quickest route to preserve jobs and capture efficiency gains.
| Risk | Recommended Reskill | Impact Example |
|---|---|---|
| Repetitive keying, form extraction | Excel, SQL, Python; AI validation & prompt design | Data Entry Clerks listed as top‑risk role in VKTR analysis |
Mail/Parcel and Routine Field Delivery Positions (Postal Service Mail Carriers and Municipal Delivery Staff)
(Up)Mail and parcel roles in Durham - city carrier assistants, campus mailroom clerks, and municipal delivery staff - center on repeatable, observable tasks that can be sped up by automation: sorting and distributing mail, scanning and logging incoming packages, weighing/labeling outgoing shipments, and notifying recipients via campus or courier systems.
Local listings show this range of work and pay: a temporary Mailroom Clerk for AppleOne in Durham is posted at $18.20/hr (about $39,520/yr) while a Postal Clerk listing shows $66,456 and a Warehouse Tech role lists $42,120, underscoring that routine delivery work spans entry to mid-level wages and affects many households and municipal budgets.
Workers who learn to operate and audit scanning/tracking systems, handle exception routing, and verify high‑value pickups can preserve or upgrade jobs; local reskilling pathways in the Research Triangle and targeted short courses offer practical routes to shift from manual sorting to supervising automated flows and customer-facing exception management.
| Role | Employer | Pay / Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Tallo job posting: Mailroom Clerk in Durham, NC | AppleOne (Durham) | $18.20/hr (~$39,520/yr) |
| Tallo job posting: Postal Clerk (Durham, NC) – No Experience Required | Postal Source (Durham) | $66,456 (posted) |
| Warehouse Tech 1 | R.R. Donnelley & Sons | $42,120 (posted) |
Paralegals and Routine Legal/Compliance Review Roles
(Up)Paralegals and routine legal‑compliance reviewers in Durham are squarely in the crosshairs of tools that automate legal research, document review, contract drafting, e‑discovery, and predictive analytics, so first‑pass tasks that once filled days can now be produced in minutes by generative AI - yet those outputs still require expert verification.
Practical consequences matter: automated drafts and summaries can “hallucinate” false citations, a problem that has produced real sanctions (for example, a reported Wyoming case where an attorney was fined $3,000 and lost pro hac vice status and others paid $1,000 for signing AI‑generated false citations), underscoring that human oversight is nonnegotiable (Colorado Technology Law Journal analysis of AI's effects on legal practice).
The defensive move is concrete: shift from doing rote review to owning AI validation, prompt design, confidentiality controls, and exception‑driven analysis so that freed hours convert to higher‑value compliance, audit, and client‑advisory work; practical tool use and governance playbooks are outlined in leading practice summaries (Stanford Law Juelsgaard Clinic overview of AI uses in legal practice) and local reskilling options can prepare Durham staff for those oversight roles (Research Triangle AI legal reskilling programs in Durham).
“Basic legal information is going to be more and more accessible through technology to more and more people.”
Conclusion: Action roadmap for Durham government workers and agencies
(Up)Treat the Durham-tested 12‑week NC Treasurer/OpenAI pilot as a practical playbook: first, inventory high‑exposure functions and publish an automated‑decision inventory following NCSL guidance and Duke's recommended policy teams to ensure transparency and worker protections (NC Treasurer and OpenAI pilot announcement, Duke AI integration policy and implementation roadmap); second, run small, public‑data pilots with strict privacy guardrails (the pilot showed 12 weeks can surface millions in unclaimed property and save staff roughly 30–60 minutes per day); third, require governance checkpoints - impact assessments, exception‑handling protocols, and human‑in‑the‑loop validation - before scale; fourth, fund rapid reskilling so affected staff move into AI‑oversight roles (prompt design, validation, exception routing) rather than backfill lost routine tasks; finally, measure results and reinvest time savings into higher‑value auditing and constituent services.
For concrete training that matches these steps, consider practical workplace courses such as Nucamp's AI Essentials for Work to equip staff with promptcraft and oversight skills and then pilot those learnings in one department before broader rollout (Nucamp AI Essentials for Work syllabus).
| Program | Key Details |
|---|---|
| AI Essentials for Work | 15 weeks; courses: AI at Work: Foundations; Writing AI Prompts; Job Based Practical AI Skills; early‑bird cost $3,582; AI Essentials for Work registration |
“Innovation, particularly around data and technology, will allow our department to deliver better results for North Carolina. I am grateful to our friends at OpenAI for partnering with us on this new endeavor, and I am excited to explore the possibilities ahead.” - Brad Briner
Frequently Asked Questions
(Up)Which government jobs in Durham are most at risk from AI?
Based on a combined analysis of LMI Institute/O*NET automation exposure scores weighted by OEWS employment shares and local studies, the top five at-risk Durham government roles are: 1) Administrative/Office Clerks and Secretaries, 2) Bookkeeping, Accounting, and Auditing Clerks, 3) Records and Data Processing roles (records clerks, data-entry specialists, permit processors), 4) Mail/Parcel and routine field delivery positions, and 5) Paralegals and routine legal/compliance review roles.
How did you identify and rank those at-risk occupations for Durham?
We combined occupational automation exposure scores (LMI Institute/O*NET, ranked 1–10) with Bureau of Labor Statistics OEWS employment shares to weight how common each occupation is locally. We then cross-referenced metro/regional context (for example, Durham–Chapel Hill MSA's 26.1% share of workers in high-automation occupations), local job-count spot checks, and state-level spot studies to ensure the list reflected both susceptibility (routine, repeatable tasks) and workforce size rather than novelty alone.
What real-world evidence from Durham's AI pilot supports these risk assessments?
Durham's 12-week NC Treasurer/OpenAI pilot (run with NCCU and limited to public data) demonstrated practical gains: preliminary analysis flagged millions in potential unclaimed property and the pilot reported average time savings of roughly 30–60 minutes per staffer per day. The trial also showed generative AI could speed financial review tasks - reducing some audit-review times to a fraction of previous durations - while underscoring risks like hallucinations that require human oversight.
If these jobs are at risk, how can affected Durham government workers adapt?
Workers should shift from routine task execution to oversight and validation roles: learn prompt-writing, AI-safe use practices, exception-handling, validation of AI outputs, and basic data tooling (Excel, SQL, Python where relevant). Practical steps include participating in short, hands-on reskilling programs (for example, Nucamp's AI Essentials for Work: 15 weeks covering AI at Work foundations, Writing AI Prompts, and Job-Based Practical AI Skills), piloting AI in small public-data projects with privacy guardrails, and moving freed hours into higher-value auditing, constituent services, or compliance tasks.
What should Durham agencies do to deploy AI responsibly while protecting workers?
Agencies should: 1) inventory high-exposure functions and publish automated-decision inventories following guidance (e.g., NCSL, Duke), 2) run small, transparent pilots with strict privacy controls (the Durham pilot shows 12 weeks can surface material gains), 3) require governance checkpoints - impact assessments, human-in-the-loop validation, and exception protocols - before scaling, 4) fund rapid reskilling so staff move into oversight and validation roles rather than being displaced, and 5) measure outcomes and reinvest time savings into higher-value services. Adopting frameworks like the NCDIT AI Framework and local training (e.g., Nucamp courses) supports these steps.
You may be interested in the following topics as well:
Discover how Moveworks integration with ServiceNow reduces ticket volume and speeds resolutions.
Imagine a public records chatbot for Durham residents that guides requests while protecting sensitive information.
Ludo Fourrage
Founder and CEO
Ludovic (Ludo) Fourrage is an education industry veteran, named in 2017 as a Learning Technology Leader by Training Magazine. Before founding Nucamp, Ludo spent 18 years at Microsoft where he led innovation in the learning space. As the Senior Director of Digital Learning at this same company, Ludo led the development of the first of its kind 'YouTube for the Enterprise'. More recently, he delivered one of the most successful Corporate MOOC programs in partnership with top business schools and consulting organizations, i.e. INSEAD, Wharton, London Business School, and Accenture, to name a few. With the belief that the right education for everyone is an achievable goal, Ludo leads the nucamp team in the quest to make quality education accessible

