Top 10 AI Prompts and Use Cases and in the Healthcare Industry in Detroit

Detroit health systems face a clear imperative: adopt AI where it delivers measurable clinical or operational value while managing risk and governance; recent multisite surveys map those priorities and barriers for U.S. health systems (Study: Adoption of Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare - multisite survey), and 2025 trend analyses show hospitals favor low‑risk, high‑ROI tools such as ambient listening for documentation reduction and machine‑vision monitoring to prevent falls and detect deterioration (Overview of 2025 AI trends in healthcare).

In Detroit, pilot projects tying AI‑assisted imaging to faster stroke detection already report shorter time‑to‑treatment, a concrete example of how targeted AI can improve outcomes and cut costs (AI-assisted imaging accelerates stroke detection in Detroit pilot); pairing those pilots with strong data governance and measurable ROI is the fastest route for Detroit hospitals to scale safe, equitable AI.

Bootcamp	AI Essentials for Work - Details
Length	15 Weeks
Cost (early bird)	$3,582
Courses	AI at Work: Foundations; Writing AI Prompts; Job Based Practical AI Skills
Register / Syllabus	AI Essentials for Work - Registration • AI Essentials for Work - Syllabus

Selection focused on practical impact for Detroit systems: prioritize prompts and use cases with local pilot data, clear workflow fit, and governance-ready deployment.

Candidates earned higher scores when tied to measurable clinical gains (for example, Henry Ford Health's RapidAI adoption cut median door‑to‑puncture time by ~20 minutes and raised home‑discharge rates - see the Henry Ford RapidAI results), when they reduced clinician documentation or imaging review time (local AI‑assisted imaging pilots in Detroit demonstrate faster time‑to‑treatment and lower costs - AI‑assisted imaging in Detroit), and when they aligned with regional research and safe‑pilot partnerships such as those advancing through the University of Michigan network (University of Michigan AI pilots).

Weighting also accounted for governance and interoperability risk - HFMA data show rapid AI adoption but limited governance maturity - so deployability, measurable ROI, and staff impact determined the final Top 10 ranking.

Criterion	Concrete example
Local clinical impact	Henry Ford RapidAI: median door‑to‑puncture ≈ −20 min; higher discharged‑home rate
Governance readiness	HFMA report: 88% using AI vs. 17% with mature governance

“It is to reimagine how we work so that clinicians, staff and patients all benefit.”

Precision diagnostics in Detroit hinges on pairing abundant local imaging capacity with AI that augments - not replaces - radiologists: regional systems like the DMC and Henry Ford operate dozens of high‑digital modalities across southeast Michigan (MRI, CT, mammography, interventional radiology and more), giving AI-ready image volumes and immediate clinical impact opportunities (DMC imaging specialties and digital modalities in southeast Michigan).

National lessons from RSNA 2024 underline practical use cases - automated triage of critical CTs, AI‑drafted structured reports for routine chest X‑rays, and multimodal models that integrate imaging with records to surface early risk signals - while stressing radiologists must lead tool design to fit workflows (RSNA 2024 plenary on AI in medical imaging and practical use cases).

Local pilots already show the so‑what: AI‑assisted reads in Detroit reduce time‑to‑treatment for stroke and other emergencies, turning image‑driven minutes into preserved function and lower downstream costs (Detroit pilot: AI-assisted imaging reduces time-to-treatment for stroke).

“We should be the ones defining our own future. We know the workflows. We need to create the tools that will change the practice of radiology.”

Predictive analytics for patient care management can move sepsis detection from hindsight to early action: Johns Hopkins' Targeted Real‑Time Early Warning System (TREWS) identified sepsis in large multisite studies with an ~82% detection rate and made severe‑case alerts nearly six hours earlier than traditional methods, a lead time that matters because “an hour delay can be the difference between life and death” (Johns Hopkins TREWS summary for AI sepsis detection).

The platform's real‑world deployment - used by thousands of clinicians across hundreds of thousands of patients and integrated with major EHR vendors for easy rollout - translated into roughly a 20% lower sepsis mortality when alerts were confirmed promptly, a concrete outcome Detroit systems can target when pairing predictive models with local governance, nurse‑led workflows, and Epic/Cerner integrations (Mayo Clinic Platform overview of TREWS and comparative algorithms).

Metric	Study result
Sepsis detection rate	≈82%
Mortality reduction (when confirmed quickly)	≈20% lower odds of death
Earlier detection in severe cases	~6 hours earlier

“It is the first instance where AI is implemented at the bedside, used by thousands of providers, and where we're seeing lives saved.” - Suchi Saria

Generative AI for clinical documentation in Detroit hospitals can cut hours of EHR time by turning dictated notes into structured, billable, and patient‑friendly outputs: Dolbey's Fusion Narrate AI Assist (now available) runs in a private, HIPAA‑compliant environment and can auto‑generate suggested impressions and recommendations, summarize reports into bulleted lists, translate or draft patient‑facing language, and surface ICD‑10 suggestions to speed coder review - capabilities positioned to shrink clinician documentation overhead while improving downstream coding accuracy and revenue capture (Dolbey Fusion Narrate AI Assist announcement).

Integration is non‑restrictive (works with any EHR, RIS/PACS, or office apps) so Detroit systems can pilot voice‑shortcut workflows and route AI‑drafted impressions directly into local coding workflows or into Fusion CAC for code validation and prioritization (Fusion Narrate AI Assist features and integration), delivering a measurable “so what”: less keyboard time for clinicians and faster, more complete charts for coders and revenue teams.

AI Assist capability	Benefit for Detroit systems
Suggested impression & recommendations	Speeds report finalization
ICD‑10 code suggestions	Improves coding accuracy and time‑to‑bill
Report summarization & patient translation	Better patient communication; less clinician editing
HIPAA‑compliant, EHR‑agnostic	Ready for secure local pilots

“Leveraging cutting-edge AI technology to enhance patient care and drive unprecedented productivity advancements is a cornerstone of our research and development strategy.” - Curtis Weeks, Dolbey VP of Product Development

AI‑driven differential diagnosis tools can cut through crowded ED worklists by systematically expanding and ranking plausible diagnoses while highlighting missing data and relevant guideline citations - an approach that targets the three core failure modes behind diagnostic error (information gathering, clinical decision support, and feedback) identified in recent emergency‑medicine literature and that includes University of Michigan collaborators (Reducing diagnostic errors in emergency medicine (PMC article)); equally important, a multidisciplinary consensus in JAMIA urges concrete methods, rigorous testing, and supervised deployment for any AI‑enabled clinical decision support so Detroit systems avoid premature rollouts and preserve clinician accountability (Recommendations for responsible AI‑enabled clinical decision support (JAMIA article)).

The practical takeaway for Detroit: prioritize CDS pilots that (1) surface differential lists with linked evidence, (2) log clinician confirmations for continuous feedback, and (3) use governance checklists from peer‑reviewed recommendations before scaling - so that AI moves from suggestive assistant to a measurable safety net in local EDs and inpatient teams.

Key point	Action for Detroit systems
AI reduces diagnostic errors by improving information gathering, CDS, and feedback	Pilot validated CDS that logs clinician responses and measures diagnostic concordance (Reducing diagnostic errors study (PMC))
Responsible deployment needs methods, testing, and supervision	Adopt JAMIA's practical guidelines for development, testing, and oversight before scaling (JAMIA recommendations for responsible AI‑enabled CDS (JAMIA))

Insilico Medicine's early 2020 use of de novo generative chemistry offers a concrete model for Michigan research systems to accelerate translational discovery: the company launched its SARS‑CoV‑2 inhibitor program at the end of January 2020, began molecule generation on January 30, and publicly released candidate protease inhibitors on February 4, 2020 - novel drug‑like compounds created with three validated approaches (crystal‑pocket, homology‑modeling, and ligand‑based generation) and posted for collaboration at the Insilico NCOV sprint AI‑designed candidates (Insilico NCOV sprint - published AI‑designed candidates); the underlying methods and timeline are detailed in a public preprint describing the generative pipeline and invitation to synthesize and test molecules (Generative chemistry preprint on ChemRxiv: generative chemistry preprint (ChemRxiv)).

So what for Detroit and Michigan? Local capacity - academic labs, contract research organizations, and University of Michigan partnerships that already accelerate safe AI pilots - can take these AI‑designed scaffolds straight into synthesis and assay, shortening the loop from in‑silico hypothesis to experimental validation and giving the region a practical pathway to convert AI creativity into regionally anchored drug discovery (University of Michigan AI pilot partnerships for translational discovery: University of Michigan AI pilot partnerships).

Item	Detail
Program start	End of January 2020 (generation began Jan 30, 2020)
Public release	Feb 4, 2020 - candidate protease inhibitors posted
Generative approaches	Crystal‑derived pocket, homology modeling, ligand‑based generation

Precision medicine in Michigan translates to AI that stitches genomics, imaging, EHR and lifestyle streams into actionable, patient‑specific plans - tools that can, for example, flag patients at substantial risk for type 2 diabetes so teams can deploy monitoring or lifestyle interventions before symptoms appear (AI in Personalized Medicine Solving Delayed Diagnoses: use cases and impact), or match tumor genetics to targeted oncology therapies by combining clinical history with molecular data (AI in Personalized Treatment Plans: top healthcare use cases).

For Detroit hospitals and Michigan research centers, the payoff is concrete: earlier, more effective interventions that reduce trial‑and‑error prescribing and shorten time-to‑benefit for chronic and complex disease cohorts, a strategy supported by translational work showing AI's promise in chronic disease management (Precision Medicine in the Era of Artificial Intelligence - Journal of Translational Medicine (2020)).

Item	Detail
Article	Precision medicine in the era of artificial intelligence (Journal of Translational Medicine, 2020)
Citations	268
Accesses	39k

“Artificial Intelligence is not just transforming healthcare - it's redefining it. By powering personalized medicine with data-driven insights, AI enables earlier diagnoses, tailored treatments, and proactive care, making precision healthcare not only possible, but scalable and more accessible for all.” - Ruchi Garg

Radiology-specific GenAI prompts should be crafted to produce structured, checklist-style outputs that slot directly into PACS/RIS/EHR workflows - prompt templates that ask for “modality, technique, key measurements, critical findings, differential with ranked likelihood, and guideline‑linked recommendations” let generative models convert dictation into synoptic impressions without extra clicks.

Vendors and studies show the payoff: Rad AI Reporting's GenAI can cut words dictated by up to 90% and halve dictation time while preserving each radiologist's voice (Rad AI Reporting - automated structured reporting), and recent ACR analyses found GPT‑4 excels at converting free text into accurate synoptic reports (F1 ≈ 0.997) and speeds surgical decision‑making by letting reviewers extract key data far faster (ACR DSI analysis: Radiology reports reimagined).

Practice-ready prompt libraries - paired with local templates and QA checks - turn reporting from a bottleneck into a predictable, auditable data source for quality improvement and downstream analytics (MedicAI - AI-driven structured radiology reporting); the so‑what is concrete: less burnout, faster critical‑case turnaround, and structured outputs that enable population analytics and research.

Metric	Reported result (source)
Dictated words reduced	Up to 90% (Rad AI)
Dictation time	Up to 50% faster per report (Rad AI)
Shift time saved	Median ~1 hour per shift reported (Rad AI)
LLM synoptic accuracy	F1 ≈ 0.997 for GPT‑4 (ACR/ Radiology AI study)
Reviewer time reduction	Surgeons spent 58% less time extracting key info (ACR)

"Rad AI Reporting gives you the ability to generate a complete report in the radiologist's own language just by dictating the pertinent findings."

Plain‑language, AI‑assisted translations of discharge summaries can quickly close the gap between clinical documentation and patient understanding - an NEJM AI–reported trial using GPT‑4 raised objective comprehension from 1.9 to 3.1 and cut average reading time from 319.1 to 170.9 seconds, with confidence scores climbing from 4.3 to 6.3, benefits that were larger for Black, Hispanic, and older adults; Detroit hospitals that pair these translations with local patient‑education workflows can expect clearer medication instructions and follow‑up plans without adding clinician time (GPT-4 plain-language translation study improving discharge summary comprehension).

Embedding this capability into post‑discharge portals, printouts, and bedside teach‑backs aligns with regional pilots that focus on measurable gains in comprehension and time‑to‑action seen across other AI uses in Detroit health systems (AI-assisted communication pilots in Detroit health systems), making the “so what” clear: faster, more confident patients who read and act on care plans sooner.

Metric	Translated (GPT‑4)	Untranslated
Objective comprehension score	3.1	1.9
Average reading time (seconds)	170.9	319.1
Confidence score	6.3	4.3

“Utilizing GPT-4 for plain language translations of discharge summary notes significantly improved comprehension outcomes across all DSN diagnoses and patient populations, with even greater benefits observed in historically marginalized populations of Black and Hispanic individuals, older adults, and patients with limited health knowledge.”

Consistent, auditable notes are a safety and compliance imperative for Detroit systems: algorithmic checks that compare free‑text notes to structured EHR tables catch the subtle mismatches that trigger diagnostic delays or billing denials, and should be part of any local AI safety stack.

Research prototypes like the CheckEHR eight‑stage consistency framework demonstrate how staged LLM‑driven checks can flag contradictions between notes and coded fields (CheckEHR eight-stage EHR consistency framework (OpenReview)), while peer‑reviewed work on automated data cleaning shows practical methods to incorporate clinical knowledge into record normalization before analytics or CDS runs - an essential step for multisite Detroit pilots that share data across Epic and Cerner instances (Automated EHR data cleaning method incorporating clinical knowledge (BMC Medical Informatics)).

Pairing those checks with vendor tools that integrate directly into EHR workflows - tools that provide ambient scribing, structured templates, and real‑time alerts - keeps clinician edits small, preserves audit trails, and shortens time to accurate coding and treatment decisions (AI medical documentation with EHR integration (Emitrr)).

The so‑what for Detroit: staged consistency checks plus automated cleaning and EHR‑native documentation cut downstream rework, improve coder confidence, and make audits and safety reviews faster and less disruptive.

Approach	Key feature	Benefit for Detroit systems
CheckEHR framework	Eight‑stage consistency checks between notes and EHR tables	Flags contradictions before they affect care or billing
Automated data cleaning (BMC)	Clinical‑knowledge driven normalization	Improves data quality for CDS, analytics, and multisite sharing
AI documentation tools (Emitrr)	EHR integration, ambient scribing, templates	Reduces clinician burden and produces audit‑ready notes

Revenue Cycle & Coding Optimization in Detroit hospitals starts with improving coding specificity and preventing denials before claims leave the door: AI-driven NLP and automated coding engines can assign up‑to‑date ICD‑10/CPT codes, scrub claims for payer rules, and draft fact‑based appeals or prior‑authorization requests to reduce downstream rework.

National scans report about 46% of hospitals now using AI in RCM and 74% deploying some form of automation, while coding errors still drive roughly 42% of claim denials - signals that targeted automation yields quick financial wins if combined with local governance and clinician review (American Hospital Association market scan: AI in revenue-cycle management; HealthTech Magazine analysis: AI in medical billing and coding).

Case studies show practical, replicable results - community hospitals cut discharged‑not‑final‑billed cases and raised coder productivity, while AI bots and multi‑layer validation saved staff hours and reduced prior‑authorization denials - patterns Detroit systems can pilot to recover revenue, shorten A/R cycles, and free coders for complex review (Exdion Health case study: AI-driven RCM and compliance insights).

Metric	Reported value (source)
Hospitals using AI in RCM	≈46% (AHA)
Hospitals with any revenue‑cycle automation	≈74% (AHA)
Claim denials due to coding errors	≈42% (HealthTech/Becker's)

Next steps for Detroit health systems are practical and sequential: scale proven pilots into EHR‑integrated, governance‑backed deployments (start with high‑value wins such as the AI-assisted imaging for faster stroke detection in Detroit), pair each rollout with measurable ROI and equity checks, and convert disruption from automation into opportunity by retraining staff so routine medical‑records automation pathways lead to roles in analytics and care‑optimization (medical records automation pathways into health data analytics in Detroit).

Anchor multisite validation with regional research partners and university collaborations, then equip clinical and operations teams with targeted skills - for example, the 15‑week AI Essentials for Work program to teach prompt writing, tool selection, and governance‑ready pilot design - so Detroit hospitals turn early clinical wins into sustained improvements in time‑to‑treatment, documentation burden, and revenue capture (AI Essentials for Work bootcamp registration).