The Complete Guide to Using AI as a Legal Professional in Colombia in 2025

AI matters for legal professionals in Colombia because the landscape is shifting from guidance to binding rules: the government's July 28, 2025 Bill would create a risk‑based regime (from prohibited to low‑risk), name the Ministry of Science as national AI authority, and authorize steep sanctions - including fines of up to 3,000 monthly minimum wages and suspension or closure of AI operations - so lawyers must map AI use and manage legal exposure now (see the Baker McKenzie briefing on the Colombia AI regulation bill)

White & Case means the international legal practice comprising White & Case LLP, a New York State registered limited liability partnership, White & Case LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated under English law and all other affiliated partnerships, companies and entities.

Colombia's national AI strategy, set out in CONPES 4144 and approved in February 2025, is a practical, risk‑aware roadmap to turn AI into a tool for productivity and inclusion rather than an unchecked experiment: the policy groups action around six strategic axes - ethics and governance, data and infrastructure, R&D and innovation, capacity and talent, risk mitigation, and use and adoption - and defines 106 concrete actions to be rolled out through 2030 with targeted public‑private coordination; the plan comes with a multi‑year investment (COP 479 billion, roughly USD 115.9M in reporting) and is led by the Department of National Planning together with MinTIC to jumpstart research hubs, data sharing, and workforce training across regions.

For lawyers, the headline is clear: Colombia wants trustworthy, auditable AI in government and industry, so compliance, transparency and impact assessment will be central as systems move from pilots into real-world public services and commercial applications - see the full CONPES 4144 policy document and the policy briefing that summarizes the investment and 106 actions for implementation.

“The approval of CONPES 4144 reflects Colombia's commitment to the responsible adoption of emerging technologies, positioning the country at the forefront of innovation and digital transformation in the region.”

Colombia's emerging AI rule‑book pivots on a simple but powerful idea: match regulatory intensity to harm. Drafts and government bills group systems into four categories - prohibited, high‑risk, limited‑risk (systems with specific transparency obligations), and low‑risk - so obligations scale from outright bans to documentation, impact assessments, explainability and mandatory human oversight; see the White & Case AI tracker for the classification and SIC guidance on data‑focused safeguards.

Key compliance touchpoints for lawyers: risk classification and registry, rigorous data‑quality and privacy checks (including privacy impact studies), traceable documentation and the right to human intervention, plus workforce transition planning.

Enforcement is strong on paper - administrative and criminal liability are contemplated, with penalties ranging up to fines of 3,000 monthly minimum wages and measures including suspension, temporary closure or permanent blocking of AI operations - details and analysis in the Baker McKenzie briefing on the Bill.

The Proposed Bill (backed by the Ministries of Science and ICT) would name the Ministry of Science as national AI authority, create a broad “Responsible for AI” compliance role that covers developers, providers and users, and preserve the Superintendence of Industry and Commerce's role on data protection and consumer matters.

AI is no longer hypothetical in Colombia's legal world - it's a working tool across courts, regulators and prosecutors: the Superintendence of Companies uses SIARELIS to surface relevant precedent and draft case opinions for corporate disputes, the Constitutional Court's Prometea triages tutela claims and

read thousands of judgments

(it once flagged 32 priority cases in under two minutes, a task estimated at ~96 working days for a single officer), and the Prosecutor General's

Fiscal Watson

correlates a criminal database of over 13 million complaints to speed investigations and spot contracting irregularities; together these public deployments sit alongside roughly 100 LegalTech providers offering digital evidence, contract lifecycle management and document automation, and growing use of AI in arbitration for legal prediction, arbitrator selection and document review.

Recent surveys of judicial staff show the practical pattern: training moved familiarity from low to substantial and drove more people to use generative tools for jurisprudence (59%), legislation (52%) and definitions (51%), but more than 80% rely on free AI versions - a flashpoint for confidentiality and verification risks.

For a detailed implementation overview see the Brigard Urrutia briefing on AI in Colombian proceedings and the Universidad de los Andes survey findings on judicial AI use.

Practical tool choices for Colombian lawyers balance global powerhouses and a growing local LegalTech scene: for court and counsel analytics consider platforms like Lex Machina legal analytics (LexisNexis) or its competitors (see the Otio roundup) for litigation intelligence, while contract lifecycle and review work is served by products such as Ironclad, Kira and Genie AI; Everlaw brings heavy‑duty e‑discovery (processing up to 90,000 documents per hour in some deployments) and Harvey and CoCounsel target fast, lawyer‑focused drafting and research.

At the same time, Colombian vendors - including Digitalaw Legaltech, Lupa Jurídica, Guane Enterprises and Doclick - deliver locally‑tuned solutions for electronic contracting, predictive judicial analytics and NLP extraction that reduce friction with Spanish language workflows and national practice norms (see the directory of Legal AI companies in Colombia).

The practical playbook: pair an analytics engine for strategy, a secure CLM for contracts, an e‑discovery/review tool for evidence-heavy matters, and a local provider for compliance, e‑signatures and Spanish‑native processing to keep confidentiality and regulatory requirements aligned with Colombia's evolving AI rules.

“It's such a great resource.”

For AI projects in Colombia, the starting point is the country's data protection framework - chiefly Law 1581 of 2012 (with Law 1266 for financial data) and secondary rules like Decree 1377 - which makes consent, special handling of sensitive data (biometrics, health, political or religious information), and documented processing purposes non‑negotiable; see the official Law 1581 summary for full definitions and duties.

Controllers and processors must register qualifying databases in the NRDB, adopt clear Spanish privacy notices, and map cross‑border flows because transfers are only allowed to countries the Superintendence of Industry and Commerce (SIC) deems adequate or under contractual safeguards.

Operational rules that matter for ML systems include mandatory security measures, breach reporting to the SIC (within 15 business days), and limits on using free, uncontrolled AI tools for confidential data - failure to comply can trigger heavy enforcement, including fines approaching roughly USD $500k and suspension of processing activities, so build data minimization, consent capture, and encryption into pipelines from day one (see the DLA Piper overview and a practical compliance guide for penalties and breach timelines).

Additionally, while Colombia does not force a formal DPO title, organisations must designate responsible persons or teams to handle data requests, correction/erasure claims and incident response - critical roles when training or deploying AI models with personal data.

Practical compliance in Colombia starts with a hard inventory: map every model in use, classify each system under the proposed four‑tier risk scheme (prohibited → high → limited/transparency → low) and treat classification as the gatekeeper for what comes next; high‑risk systems demand documented impact assessments, traceable data‑quality controls and mandatory human oversight, while limited‑risk tools require clear user notice and deactivation options - details echoed in the White & Case tracker and the Baker McKenzie briefing, which also recommend internal AI governance policies and highlight that IP use of works, voices or images needs explicit consent (see the Baker McKenzie briefing and the White & Case AI tracker).

Operational must‑dos: run privacy impact studies early (SIC Circular 002 guidance), adopt privacy‑by‑design measures (differential privacy, minimisation, breach reporting), keep an auditable technical and policy dossier (model cards, datasets, testing logs), appoint a named Responsible for AI with cross‑functional authority, train affected staff and document workforce‑transition plans, and lock down confidential data by avoiding uncontrolled free tools; enforcement is serious - the drafts contemplate fines up to 3,000 monthly minimum wages, suspensions of up to 24 months and even permanent blocking - so codify governance now, iterate continuously, and use the checklist below to turn obligations into repeatable steps.

Can a U.S. lawyer practice in Colombia? Short answer: not in court - Colombian procedure requires a locally licensed abogado holding a valid tarjeta profesional to appear before Colombian tribunals, so the courtroom doors stay closed to foreign practitioners unless they requalify or work through local counsel; authoritative guidance on practising and setting up legal business in Colombia is available from the Law Society Doing Legal Business in Colombia guide and the country licensing overview at Trade.gov Colombia licensing overview explains that licensure by the relevant professional council starts with a valid academic diploma or professional certificate.

For cross‑border matters - including advising on AI compliance, contracts or international transactions - U.S. lawyers can add value by handling U.S. law aspects or coordinating strategy, but practical delivery should pair them with a Colombian firm (verify the local lawyer's tarjeta profesional via the Consejo Superior de la Judicatura tarjeta profesional verification and follow due diligence best practices outlined in the SRIS Colombia due diligence guide) to ensure enforceability, correct procedural steps and compliance with local rules.

Adoption in Colombia is already practical and fast-moving: targeted training lifted judicial staff familiarity from 63% reporting minimal knowledge to 85% with moderate‑to‑high familiarity, and on-the-job use climbed from roughly one‑third to nearly half of respondents; concrete use cases show generative tools being used for jurisprudence (59%), legislation (52%) and definitions (51%), even as more than 80% still rely on free, consumer-grade tools - a risky habit given confidentiality concerns and the regulatory spotlight from the proposed national framework (see the White & Case AI Global Regulatory Tracker - Colombia).

The result: Colombian lawyers are moving from curiosity to routine use, mirroring global trends (Thomson Reuters found 26% of professionals using GenAI at work), but with a distinctly local urgency - public deployments have, for example, flagged 32 priority tutela cases in under two minutes, a task that would have taken months by manual review - so law firms and in‑house teams must pair rapid upskilling with documented governance and vendor controls to manage risk and client confidentiality.

“A task that would previously have taken an hour was completed in five minutes.”

First steps for legal professionals adopting AI in Colombia are practical and urgent: catalogue every model in use, classify systems under the proposed prohibited→high→limited→low risk framework, and prioritize privacy and rights impact studies for anything that could affect fundamental rights - a simple inventory today can prevent severe sanctions tomorrow.

Preserve auditable documentation (model cards, dataset lineage, testing logs), name a Responsible for AI to own compliance duties, lock down confidential matter data (avoid free consumer tools), and pair rapid upskilling with governance so speed doesn't outpace safety - remember Prometea flagged 32 priority tutela cases in under two minutes, a vivid example of how powerful assistance can be and why human review must stay central.

Monitor the evolving legislative landscape with a trusted tracker like the White & Case AI Global Regulatory Tracker for Colombia, and invest in practical training (for example, the AI Essentials for Work bootcamp registration - Nucamp) that teaches prompt craft, tool selection and operational controls so teams move from experimentation to compliant, repeatable practice.