Top 10 AI Prompts and Use Cases and in the Government Industry in Chattanooga
Last Updated: August 15th 2025

Too Long; Didn't Read:
Chattanooga government contractors can use 10 targeted AI prompts to turn procurement data into wins: track 416 local contracts/year, surface CDBG $1.635M and HOME $860K grants, find $1M–$218M subcontract leads, exploit FY timing, and assemble compliant teaming lists fast.
Chattanooga contractors and local agencies can turn a flood of procurement data into focused wins by using targeted AI prompts to find open opportunities, likely bidders, and ideal teaming partners - capabilities highlighted in GovTribe's prompt playbook for government contractors (GovTribe prompt playbook for government contractors) - and to exploit fiscal timing when year-end spending creates urgent buys.
That matters in Tennessee now: as federal support tightens and cities must “do more with less,” Chattanooga's offices can use AI to surface efficient, evidence-based solutions while small contractors build relevance quickly (evidence-based budgeting for Chattanooga).
Practical skills - how to write those exact prompts and apply insights to capture contracts - are taught in programs like Nucamp's Nucamp AI Essentials for Work bootcamp, so teams can move from data overwhelm to targeted bids that stretch scarce dollars.
Attribute | Information |
---|---|
Description | Gain practical AI skills for any workplace; learn prompt writing and apply AI across business functions. |
Length | 15 Weeks |
Courses included | AI at Work: Foundations; Writing AI Prompts; Job Based Practical AI Skills |
Cost | $3,582 (early bird); $3,942 (after) |
Syllabus | AI Essentials for Work syllabus |
“We've developed complex prompts based on our team's extensive knowledge of government contracting, enabling customers to answer critical business questions in minutes instead of hours.”
Table of Contents
- Methodology: How We Selected the Top 10 AI Prompts and Use Cases
- Prompt 1: Find open federal contract opportunities for Chattanooga - Opportunity Identification
- Prompt 2: List federal grant opportunities for Chattanooga-focused research - Grants Search
- Prompt 3: Find subcontracting opportunities with prime contractors active in Chattanooga - Subcontracting Leads
- Prompt 4: Find contract opportunities in my field related to year-end spending - Fiscal Year Timing
- Prompt 5: Find vendors similar to Baker Donelson - Competitor Profiling
- Prompt 6: Identify the predecessor contract for this opportunity - Historical Contract Review
- Prompt 7: Find active contracts with similar scopes of work - Market Trend Analysis
- Prompt 8: Identify key decision-makers for contracts in the Tennessee Valley Authority - Targeted Outreach
- Prompt 9: Analyze this contract opportunity and suggest potential teaming partners - AI-Suggested Teaming
- Prompt 10: Analyze the impact of recent policy changes on cybersecurity services - Policy and Risk Analysis
- Conclusion: Bringing It Home for Chattanooga Contractors
- Frequently Asked Questions
Check out next:
Begin with a pragmatic Step-by-step AI starter playbook for Chattanooga agencies ready to pilot projects.
Methodology: How We Selected the Top 10 AI Prompts and Use Cases
(Up)Selection began with GovTribe's operational playbook - its “10 AI prompts” served as the backbone for usability and coverage - then applied GovTribe search best practices (filters, saved searches, exact-phrase syntax) to ensure each prompt maps to repeatable workflows Chattanooga contractors can run today; see the GovTribe prompt playbook (GovTribe prompt playbook: 10 AI prompts every government contractor should be using) and Search 101 guidance (GovTribe Search 101 user guide) for the exact mechanics.
Prompts were prioritized by three checks: (1) immediate procurement value (opportunity identification, subcontracting, fiscal-year timing), (2) policy and security relevance (AI vendor bias rules and FedRAMP requirements), and (3) local mission fit (GIS and grant-focused use cases that matter in Tennessee).
Each prompt had to be executable with saved alerts or AI Insights and validated against a live solicitation profile - such as the Treasury AI Tools notice that specifies FedRAMP, U.S.-based processing, and 99.9% uptime - so Chattanooga small businesses get prompts they can turn into bids within weeks, not months.
Source | Key Metrics |
---|---|
AI Vendor Bias Requirements | 31 open opps · 10 potential recompetes · 20 key vendors · 300 files |
Artificial Intelligence in GIS | 25 open opps · 20 potential recompetes · 20 key vendors · 300 files |
“We've developed complex prompts based on our team's extensive knowledge of government contracting, enabling customers to answer critical business questions in minutes instead of hours.”
Prompt 1: Find open federal contract opportunities for Chattanooga - Opportunity Identification
(Up)Use an AI prompt that mirrors real search behavior - combine exact-phrase keywords, relevant NAICS/PSC codes, and a Chattanooga location filter - to pull federal solicitations into a tractable pipeline; GovTribe Search 101 guide for searching federal solicitations, and saved searches plus recommendation engines can push those matches to your inbox so local teams don't miss time-sensitive posts (How to find contract opportunities with saved searches and recommendations - GovTribe blog).
Tie that prompt to the City of Chattanooga open bids and solicitations portal for municipal leads and use GovTribe's Federal Contract Opportunities view to pull solicitation metadata (agency, NAICS, due date) so opportunities can be triaged by fit and deadline; the payoff is concrete - market tools tracked 416 Chattanooga-area contracts in a year, so a well-tuned saved search converts overwhelming volume into a short list of high-probability pursuits.
Metric | Value |
---|---|
Contracts tracked (1 year) | 416 (GovWin sample) |
Common contract categories | Construction, IT, maintenance, professional services, grounds & facilities |
“We've developed complex prompts based on our team's extensive knowledge of government contracting, enabling customers to answer critical business questions in minutes instead of hours.”
Prompt 2: List federal grant opportunities for Chattanooga-focused research - Grants Search
(Up)Use an AI prompt that searches Grants.gov and agency NOFO pages for “Chattanooga” or “Tennessee” plus program names (CDBG, HOME, NOAA, HUD PD&R) and filters by deadline and applicant type to produce an actionable shortlist; the City of Chattanooga's NOFA shows a CDBG entitlement pool of $1,635,000 (CDBG apps open Feb 10, due March 14, 2025) and HOME funds totaling $860,000 with ongoing proposals and explicit eligibility for governmental entities, 501(c)(3) nonprofits, and for‑profit partners (City of Chattanooga NOFA and Grants Workshop 2025-2026).
At the federal level, NOAA's Transformational Habitat Restoration and Coastal Resilience opportunity makes up to $100 million available (awards $750k–$10M; typical $4–6M; tribal set‑aside up to 15%; apps due April 16, 2025) for habitat and resilience work (NOAA Transformational Habitat Restoration and Coastal Resilience Grants), and HUD's PD&R posted $20M in research NOFOs addressing housing affordability (applications due July 24, 2025) that align to municipal housing priorities (HUD PD&R $20M Housing Affordability Research Grants).
So what: combining city NOFA priorities with these federal NOFOs - using deadline and eligibility filters - turns a broad grants scan into a two‑week prioritized proposal pipeline local teams can act on now.
Grant | Agency | Deadline | Amount / Notes |
---|---|---|---|
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) | City of Chattanooga / HUD | March 14, 2025 | Total CDBG $1,635,000; 501(c)(3) & government eligible |
HOME Investment Partnership (HOME) | City of Chattanooga / HUD | Ongoing | Total HOME $860,000; for‑profit, public, non‑profit eligible |
Transformational Habitat Restoration & Coastal Resilience | NOAA | April 16, 2025 | Up to $100M; awards $750k–$10M; tribal set‑aside up to 15% |
PD&R Research Grant Opportunities | HUD PD&R | July 24, 2025 | $20M in competitive research grants (housing affordability & innovation) |
Prompt 3: Find subcontracting opportunities with prime contractors active in Chattanooga - Subcontracting Leads
(Up)Target primes by prompting an AI to scan SAM.gov and recent local solicitations for Chattanooga POAs, NAICS codes (e.g., 236220) and active sources-sought - this surfaces high-value subcontracting leads such as the Tennessee Air National Guard's “Construct 241st Security Measures” presolicitation (place of performance: 6511 Bonny Oaks Drive, Chattanooga; magnitude $1M–$5M) and lets small firms flag pre-bid conferences, site visits, and SAM registration requirements quickly; see the SAM.gov presolicitation for full solicitation access and dates (SAM.gov Construct 241st Security Measures presolicitation details) and the companion market notice on GovernmentContracts for sources‑sought instructions (Construct 241st Security Measures sources‑sought market notice).
Expand the prompt to include large-design procurements (GSA's Lead Designer RFQ for the new Chattanooga courthouse) to identify prime teams and planned small‑business networking events where subcontractors can meet shortlisted firms like Fentress or HOK (GSA Design Excellence Lead Designer RFQ - Chattanooga courthouse).
So what: a well‑crafted prompt converts raw solicitations into a prioritized outreach list (POC, pre‑bid date, NAICS, magnitude), enabling timely capability pitches that win subcontract slots on $1M–$218M local projects.
Attribute | Value |
---|---|
Opportunity | Construct 241st Security Measures (W50S98-25-B-A006) |
NAICS / PSC | 236220 / Y1PZ |
Place of Performance | Chattanooga, TN (6511 Bonny Oaks Drive) |
Magnitude | $1,000,000 – $5,000,000 |
Primary POC | Kristen Phipps - kristen.phipps@us.af.mil - 865-336-3353 |
“Any work that a similarly situated entity further subcontracts will count towards the prime contractor's 85 percent subcontract amount that cannot be exceeded”.
Prompt 4: Find contract opportunities in my field related to year-end spending - Fiscal Year Timing
(Up)Use a fiscal‑year timing prompt that filters solicitations by obligated‑fund year, “anticipated award” or “anticipated award quarter,” and local place‑of‑performance to surface high‑probability late‑year buys in Tennessee; examples to monitor now include the Chickamauga Lock Replacement approach wall (USACE solicitation with offers updated to July 8, 2025 and an anticipated award in the fourth quarter of FY2025) and GSA's new Chattanooga U.S. Courthouse, where the Construction Manager as Constructor (CMc) award is anticipated in the fourth quarter of calendar 2025 after A/E selection - both notices flag timing-driven urgency that teams can exploit by pre-registering, scheduling site visits, and lining up key subcontracts before the award window (Chickamauga Lock Replacement solicitation on SAM.gov, GSA Chattanooga U.S. Courthouse project details on GSA.gov).
So what: an AI prompt tuned for FY timing turns a noisy opportunity feed into a short list of projects where accelerated buying near year‑end makes responsiveness - not just capability - the deciding factor.
Opportunity | Agency | Timing / Key Dates |
---|---|---|
Chickamauga Lock Replacement Approach Wall | U.S. Army Corps of Engineers | Offers updated to Jul 8, 2025; Anticipated award: Q4 FY2025 |
Chattanooga U.S. Courthouse - CMc award | GSA | A/E contract awarded Apr 15, 2025; CMc award anticipated 4th quarter 2025 |
Prompt 5: Find vendors similar to Baker Donelson - Competitor Profiling
(Up)Prompt 5 uses an AI prompt that profiles firms matching Baker Donelson's local footprint - filtering for a Chattanooga office, multidisciplinary practices (economic development, health law, emerging companies) and published government‑services guidance - to surface direct competitors and realistic teaming partners in Tennessee; for example, seed the prompt with Baker Donelson's Chattanooga office profile (Baker Donelson Chattanooga office profile), the firm's regional Economic Development practice (Baker Donelson Economic Development practice), and its Disaster Recovery & Government Services guidance on federal procurement rules (Baker Donelson guidance on contracting under federal procurement requirements after Hurricane Ida); score matches by on‑the‑ground presence, FEMA/HHS/CMS experience, and practice overlap (public‑private incentives, procurement compliance, health law), then export a ranked shortlist with POC and capability notes so Chattanooga teams know quickly whether to pursue subcontracting, joint bids, or head‑to‑head competition - a crucial edge when local contracts hinge on relationships and procurement compliance, and when Baker Donelson's Chattanooga roots extend more than 60 years.
Attribute | Information |
---|---|
Office (Chattanooga) | 633 Chestnut Street, Suite 1900, Chattanooga, TN 37450 |
Contact | T: 423.756.2010 • Email: contact@bakerdonelson.com |
Key practices to match | Economic Development; Disaster Recovery & Government Services; Health Law; Emerging Companies |
Local history | Firm roots in Chattanooga go back more than 60 years |
Prompt 6: Identify the predecessor contract for this opportunity - Historical Contract Review
(Up)To identify a predecessor contract for a Chattanooga opportunity, prompt an AI to pull and cross‑check three specific data points: the PIID and modification trail (to see who held the work and when it changed), the awardee's Unique Entity ID/CAGE (to link predecessor and successor firms), and FPDS/award metadata (dollar amounts, TAS, place of performance).
Run that prompt against SAM.gov's Contract Data/Databank reports (SAM.gov DataBank contract reports) to retrieve FPDS-derived award and modification histories, then match against USAspending's award and subaward records (USAspending.gov award search tool) for obligations and first‑tier subcontract links; for older or archival records follow the Library of Congress research path for historical contracts (Library of Congress historical government contracts guide).
So what: a clean predecessor‑contract record reveals incumbency, scope drift, and modification patterns that decide whether to propose a novation, pitch as a teaming partner, or underwrite an aggressive competitive bid in Tennessee's tight procurement lanes.
Source | What to extract |
---|---|
SAM.gov DataBank | PIID, modification history, contracting office, award documents |
USAspending.gov | Obligations, award/subaward linkages, recipient UEI/CAGE |
Library of Congress / Archives | Pre‑digital and historical contract records, agency finding aids |
Prompt 7: Find active contracts with similar scopes of work - Market Trend Analysis
(Up)Prompt 7 should ask an AI to map active local solicitations against national program patterns - using NTIA/BroadbandUSA award data to spot recurring scopes (middle‑mile fiber, FTTP/XGS‑PON, 2.5 GHz or CBRS fixed wireless, LEO satellite fallbacks, device/subsidy programs, and Network Operations Centers) so Tennessee bidders can classify opportunities by build vs.
operate roles and avoid expensive scope mismatches; see NTIA/BroadbandUSA award listings for the project types and common technical stacks (NTIA/BroadbandUSA award listings and project types).
In practice, an AI prompt that returns “matches” (local RFP vs. national templates) reveals whether a Chattanooga firm should bid as a prime for trenching/FTTP or position as an ISP/operator partner offering CPE, managed NOC services, or device distribution - streamlining decision-making and turning a noisy bid queue into a prioritized outreach list.
Tie that output to local AI governance and procurement workflows so technical assumptions and data‑privacy checks align with municipal requirements (Complete guide to using AI in the government industry in Chattanooga).
Common Scopes | Typical Technologies | Observed Award Size Range |
---|---|---|
Last‑mile FTTP; fixed wireless; device subsidy & adoption | FTTP/XGS‑PON, 2.5 GHz, CBRS, LEO CPE, NOC | $0.5M – $70M+ |
“We've developed complex prompts based on our team's extensive knowledge of government contracting, enabling customers to answer critical business questions in minutes instead of hours.”
Prompt 8: Identify key decision-makers for contracts in the Tennessee Valley Authority - Targeted Outreach
(Up)Prompt 8 should direct an AI to harvest and rank contact metadata from Tennessee Valley Authority solicitations, amendments, and public vendor notices - extracting point‑of‑contact names, roles, emails and phone numbers where available - and to run OCR/LLM pipelines on scanned PDFs so buried POC details become searchable records (Nucamp AI Essentials for Work syllabus: OCR and LLM automation for role transitions).
Then apply lightweight validation and tagging so outreach lists distinguish contracting officers, program managers, and technical POCs and flag privacy or bias risks under local governance rules (Nucamp Responsible AI governance guidance for workplace deployment).
Tie the output to workflow automation - chatbot or alerting channels that free staff from manual lookups - so teams spend hours on tailored proposal strategy instead of contact harvesting; the payoff is a verified, auditable outreach list that accelerates targeted TVA engagement while keeping data handling compliant and efficient (Nucamp case study: 24/7 AI support reducing response load).
Prompt 9: Analyze this contract opportunity and suggest potential teaming partners - AI-Suggested Teaming
(Up)Prompt 9 asks an AI to read the solicitation SOW, evaluation criteria, past‑performance records, and compliance clauses, then recommend teaming partners whose certifications and capabilities close gaps the prime can't fill - an approach GovTribe lists as “Analyze this contract opportunity and suggest potential teaming partners” in its GovTribe AI prompts playbook for government contractors.
Practical prompts borrow Samsearch's structure - identify where partners add value, name the expertise required (for example, CMMC Level 3 for cybersecurity work), and explain the benefits each partner brings - so AI returns a short, ranked list with roles and rationale, as shown in Samsearch partner-sourcing prompt examples.
Backed by Deltek's findings that AI can quickly extract risk, past‑performance and contract language, this workflow can cut vendor due‑diligence from days to minutes (e.g., vendor‑info bots used by services programs) and surface pairings that match weighted evaluation criteria - think a Chattanooga prime plus a CMMC‑certified MSP for TVA cybersecurity work, or a local design firm (Fentress/HOK) paired with specialty subs for the courthouse CMc - so teams assemble compliant, complementary proposals faster and with clearer win themes, as discussed in Deltek analysis of AI in government contracting.
“We've developed complex prompts based on our team's extensive knowledge of government contracting, enabling customers to answer critical business questions in minutes instead of hours.”
Prompt 10: Analyze the impact of recent policy changes on cybersecurity services - Policy and Risk Analysis
(Up)Prompt 10 should direct an AI to read solicitations, FAR/DFARS clauses, and agency fact sheets to quantify how Executive Order 14306 and related 2024–25 rulemakings change cybersecurity obligations for Tennessee contractors: E.O. 14306 scales back centralized software‑attestation mandates while expressly leaving in place DFARS/NIST requirements and a near‑final CMMC rule, so Chattanooga firms may see fewer blanket attestation asks but still must meet NIST controls and CMMC certification for DoD work (see the WilmerHale client alert on Executive Order 14306 cybersecurity changes).
At the same time, federal enforcement remains active - DOJ Civil Cyber‑Fraud Initiative actions and high‑value settlements (examples cited at $4.6M and $8.4M) show that inaccurate SPRS entries or failures to implement NIST SP 800‑171 controls carry real financial risk - so an AI prompt should flag CMMC/DFARS clauses, SPRS scores, CUI handling, PQC/IoT labeling requirements, and signs of possible False Claims exposure (see analysis of evolving contractor cybersecurity obligations and Dickinson Wright on DOJ cybersecurity enforcement and CMMC).
So what: for Chattanooga primes and subs, a prompt that auto‑extracts cybersecurity clauses and cross‑checks SPRS/CMMC status can convert policy noise into a two‑week remediation list that prevents losing bids or incurring multimillion‑dollar enforcement exposures.
Policy Change / Rule | Implication for Tennessee Contractors |
---|---|
E.O. 14306 (June 6, 2025) | Attestation requirements scaled back; agencies retain some technical mandates (PQC, DNS, IP registry rules) |
DFARS / NIST SP 800‑171 & CMMC | DoD-required NIST controls remain; CMMC implementation and assessments required for CUI work |
DOJ Civil Cyber‑Fraud Initiative | Enforcement risk for misrepresentations - settlements reached into multimillions |
IoT Trust Mark / PQC | Labeling and post‑quantum planning retained - procurements may require compliance |
“imposing unproven and burdensome software accounting processes that prioritized compliance checklists over genuine security investments.”
Conclusion: Bringing It Home for Chattanooga Contractors
(Up)Bring it home for Chattanooga: pair the ten AI prompts with automated saved searches so opportunities come to you - create a GovTribe saved search filtered to Chattanooga NAICS/keywords and set Email Notification to “Instant” so matching opportunities (GovTribe refreshes data about every 15 minutes) arrive within roughly 15 minutes rather than getting buried among the 70,000+ federal postings in 2025; use AI to triage fiscal‑year timing, surface likely primes for subcontracting, and generate ranked teaming shortlists, then turn those insights into action with hands‑on prompt‑writing and OCR/LLM workflows taught in Nucamp's AI Essentials for Work bootcamp (GovTribe saved searches and email notifications guide, Nucamp AI Essentials for Work registration and syllabus).
Start with three saved searches (primary NAICS, year‑end buys, and grants) and let AI surface the top 3–5 high‑probability pursuits weekly so Tennessee teams focus proposal effort where it wins.
Action | Recommendation / Detail |
---|---|
Saved Search Cadence | Instant (alerts ≈15 minutes) - set for Chattanooga NAICS and year‑end filters |
Training | AI Essentials for Work - 15 weeks; practical prompt writing & OCR/LLM (register: Nucamp AI Essentials for Work registration) |
“We've developed complex prompts based on our team's extensive knowledge of government contracting, enabling customers to answer critical business questions in minutes instead of hours.”
Frequently Asked Questions
(Up)What are the top AI prompts Chattanooga government contractors should use?
Use targeted prompts for: 1) Opportunity identification (federal solicitations filtered by NAICS/PSC and Chattanooga location), 2) Grants search (Grants.gov and NOFO pages filtered by Chattanooga/Tennessee and deadlines), 3) Subcontracting leads (scan SAM.gov and local presolicitations), 4) Fiscal-year timing (filter by obligated-fund year or anticipated award quarter), 5) Competitor profiling (find local firms like Baker Donelson), 6) Predecessor contract lookup (PIID, modification trail, UEI/CAGE), 7) Market trend analysis (map local solicitations to national program patterns), 8) Targeted outreach (harvest TVA POCs), 9) AI-suggested teaming (analyze SOW and recommend partners), and 10) Policy and risk analysis (extract DFARS/CMMC/SPRS/CUI obligations). These prompts convert broad feeds into prioritized, actionable leads for Chattanooga teams.
How can AI prompts help local teams capture more Chattanooga government contracts quickly?
AI prompts paired with saved searches and alerts turn overwhelming procurement data into shortlists that surface high-probability pursuits within weeks. Examples: saved searches filtered to Chattanooga NAICS push instant alerts (≈15 minutes), fiscal-year timing prompts reveal late-year buys to exploit urgent awards, subcontracting and teaming prompts surface prime contractors and networking events, and automated SOW analysis recommends partners to close capability gaps - reducing hours of manual research to minutes and enabling faster, targeted proposal work.
Which local grant and contract opportunities mentioned are most relevant to Chattanooga right now?
Key opportunities highlighted include: City of Chattanooga CDBG (total $1,635,000; applications due March 14, 2025), HOME funds (total $860,000; ongoing), NOAA Transformational Habitat Restoration & Coastal Resilience (applications due April 16, 2025; awards $750K–$10M, up to $100M program), HUD PD&R research grants (deadline July 24, 2025; $20M). For contracts, examples include the Chickamauga Lock Replacement approach wall (USACE; offers updated Jul 8, 2025; anticipated award Q4 FY2025) and the Chattanooga U.S. Courthouse CMc award (anticipated late 2025). Use prompts filtered by deadlines, eligibility, and place of performance to prioritize these.
What data sources and validation steps should Chattanooga contractors use with these AI prompts?
Primary sources: GovTribe/Federal Contract Opportunities views for solicitations, SAM.gov and FPDS for award and modification histories, USAspending for obligations/subaward links, Grants.gov and agency NOFO pages for grants, NTIA/BroadbandUSA lists for broadband program patterns, and agency notices (e.g., TVA) for POCs. Validation steps: extract PIID/UEI/CAGE for predecessor checks, cross-check FPDS and USAspending records, run OCR/LLM on scanned PDFs to surface buried POCs, apply lightweight contact validation, and tag records for privacy/compliance. Ensure prompts require FedRAMP/CMMC/NIST clauses where relevant and verify vendor certifications before outreach.
What training and practical workflow changes help Chattanooga teams turn AI insights into awarded work?
Adopt hands-on prompt-writing and OCR/LLM workflows taught in practical courses (e.g., Nucamp's AI Essentials for Work: 15-week program covering foundations, prompt writing, and job-based AI skills). Recommended operational changes: create three core saved searches (primary NAICS, year-end buys, grants) set to instant alerts, tie AI outputs to automated outreach and proposal-prep checklists, use AI to triage FY timing and recommend teaming partners, and enforce local AI governance for data privacy and procurement compliance. These steps convert AI-suggested shortlists into prioritized proposal efforts that win contracts.
You may be interested in the following topics as well:
Growing chatbot accuracy means customer service representatives should pivot to AI oversight and customer-success specialties.
Learn practical methods for measuring ROI for AI pilots so Chattanooga leaders can track cost savings and service gains.
Ludo Fourrage
Founder and CEO
Ludovic (Ludo) Fourrage is an education industry veteran, named in 2017 as a Learning Technology Leader by Training Magazine. Before founding Nucamp, Ludo spent 18 years at Microsoft where he led innovation in the learning space. As the Senior Director of Digital Learning at this same company, Ludo led the development of the first of its kind 'YouTube for the Enterprise'. More recently, he delivered one of the most successful Corporate MOOC programs in partnership with top business schools and consulting organizations, i.e. INSEAD, Wharton, London Business School, and Accenture, to name a few. With the belief that the right education for everyone is an achievable goal, Ludo leads the nucamp team in the quest to make quality education accessible