Work Smarter, Not Harder: Top 5 AI Prompts Every Finance Professional in Brazil Should Use in 2025
Last Updated: September 5th 2025

Too Long; Didn't Read:
Top 5 AI prompts for finance professionals in Brazil (2025) - refresh forecasts, get morning cash by entity, extend runway via cost levers, detect missing GL transactions, and summarize AR aging. Adoption is backed by a US$49.2B market by 2030 and BRL13 billion in AI funding by 2025; comply with LGPD.
Brazil's finance teams can no longer treat AI as future hype - adoption is racing ahead: the national AI market is forecast to hit roughly US$49.2B by 2030, with applied and generative projects drawing massive capital inflows, including an expected BRL13 billion for AI initiatives by 2025, so prompts that sharpen forecasting, cash checks and AR workflows deliver immediate ROI (Brazil AI market forecast 2030 - Grand View Research, AI investment and regulatory trends in Brazil 2025 - Chambers Practice Guides).
Finance leaders must also design prompts that respect LGPD and upcoming rules in Bill No. 2,338/2023 and ANPD guidance - prompting for explainable outputs and human review reduces legal exposure while surfacing operational wins (faster close cycles, cleaner AR aging and smarter runway analysis).
For teams ready to turn these prompts into day‑one skills, the AI Essentials for Work bootcamp offers hands‑on practice in writing effective prompts and applying them across FP&A and treasury workflows: Register for Nucamp AI Essentials for Work bootcamp.
Bootcamp | Length | Core Courses | Early Bird Cost | Registration |
---|---|---|---|---|
AI Essentials for Work | 15 Weeks | AI at Work: Foundations; Writing AI Prompts; Job‑Based Practical AI Skills | $3,582 | Register for Nucamp AI Essentials for Work bootcamp |
Table of Contents
- Methodology: How We Selected and Tested the Top 5 Prompts
- "Refresh the forecast with June actuals and update Q4 projections"
- "What's our total cash position by entity, as of this morning?"
- "In which cost areas can we reduce spending to extend our runway without impacting revenue retention?"
- "Which GL accounts appear to have missing transactions based on historical patterns?"
- "Summarize open AR by aging bucket and top 10 overdue customers"
- Conclusion: Deploying These Prompts Safely and Quickly in Brazil
- Frequently Asked Questions
Check out next:
Learn the essentials of LGPD requirements for AI processing and practical steps to protect customer data in Brazil.
Methodology: How We Selected and Tested the Top 5 Prompts
(Up)Selection began by triangulating vendor prompt libraries and real-world usage: Concourse's catalogue of 30 high-impact prompts and deployment claims provided the baseline for common workflows (forecast refreshes, cash checks, AR aging, GL anomaly detection), Nilus's role-tailored prompts supplied treasury and controller checklists, and a spreadsheet-first Brazil lens (Excel-centric FP&A tools) ensured suggestions fit local habits and systems; sources were cross-checked for frequency, actionability, and integration requirements via ERPs and bank feeds.
Shortlisting favored prompts that return audit-ready narratives, tables, or exception lists, connect to source systems, and support rapid human review - criteria drawn from Concourse's and Nilus's usage notes and from local regulatory guidance like BACEN/CVM expectations for AI deployments.
Testing used anonymized ERP extracts and Excel workbooks to validate outputs, measured time-to-insight (deployments that mirror Concourse's “live in less than 10 minutes” promise), and confirmed compliance steps for LGPD and review gates.
The result: five prompts that solve Brazil's highest‑value finance problems while keeping control, traceability, and bank/ERP connectivity front and center (see Concourse prompt library, Nilus role-specific prompts, and BACEN/CVM guidance for context).
"Refresh the forecast with June actuals and update Q4 projections"
"Refresh the forecast with June actuals and update Q4 projections"
(Up)For Brazilian finance teams, the refresh with June actuals and update Q4 projections prompt is the practical hinge between spreadsheet habit and faster, audit‑ready forecasting: feed your ERP or bank feeds (or the Excel sheets your team still loves), let an FP&A engine pull June actuals, and generate updated Q4 scenarios with variance explanations so leaders get clear choices - not another Budget_Final_v17 email chain.
Tools that keep Excel at the center while adding automation and AI make this realistic: Cube and Vena both foreground Excel/Sheets continuity and two‑way sync, Datarails surfaces conversational, AI‑driven variance narratives, and platform approaches that push live data pipes remove repetitive CSV wrangling (Cube FP&A Excel and Google Sheets integration, Vena vs Datarails Excel-native FP&A integration, Datarails AI-powered FP&A tools).
The so what? is immediate: instead of hunting for reconciled actuals, finance can produce scenario‑level guidance for treasury and the board within the same close cadence, preserving LGPD‑compliant review gates and audit trails.
Prompt | Required inputs | Typical outputs / tools |
---|---|---|
Refresh forecast with June actuals; update Q4 | ERP actuals, bank feeds or Excel workbooks, GL mappings | Reconciled actuals, variance explanations, updated Q4 scenarios - Cube, Vena, Datarails, Savant |
Refresh the forecast with June actuals and update Q4 projections
"What's our total cash position by entity, as of this morning?"
(Up)Asking “What's our total cash position by entity, as of this morning?” in Brazil should return instant, bank‑grade answers - because real‑time rails like Pix have turned cash visibility into a practical expectation: Pix handled tens of billions of instant moves (37.4B in 2023 per ACI and roughly 64B in 2024 per Stripe) and now settles payments across accounts in seconds, which means treasury can get near‑live balances if bank feeds and DICT mappings are in place (ACI real‑time payments in Brazil, Stripe guide to Pix replacing cards and cash in Brazil).
The so‑what is concrete: morning cash by entity drives payroll, supplier cutoff decisions and short‑term FX hedges, but Brazil's fragmented banking landscape and manual reconciliation tasks still force many teams to stitch feeds and invoices together (use static QR or invoice references to automate matching).
Link balances to entity‑level GL mappings, apply LGPD‑safe review gates, and treasury produces an auditable, per‑entity net cash report before the first coffee is gone.
For practical checks, consult Banco Central Pix statistics to confirm participant and transaction scopes before trusting any single feed (Banco Central Pix Pix statistics and reports).
Metric | Value / Year |
---|---|
Pix transactions | 37.4 billion (2023) - ACI |
Pix transactions | ~64 billion (2024) - Stripe |
Real‑time share of electronic payments | 36.2% (2023) - ACI |
Pix active users | 150+ million - ACI |
“Taxation and bureaucracy are the biggest issues in Brazil” - Fernando de Gouveia
"In which cost areas can we reduce spending to extend our runway without impacting revenue retention?"
(Up)To stretch runway without risking revenue retention, focus on the classic high‑impact levers that Brazilian finance teams can actually act on today: tighten procurement and indirect spend by consolidating suppliers and applying zero‑base controls; rightsize cloud and software licensing so overprovisioned instances and unused seats stop bleeding margin; automate back‑office workflows (T&E, claims, reconciliations) and deploy AI for cost transparency so owners can see true cost drivers at the SKU, project or entity level; and simplify product and operating‑model complexity so frontline teams aren't supporting duplicate, low‑margin offerings.
These priorities map to what global CFOs are doing - 69% put cost optimization top of the list and 58% are using automation and AI to get there (see the SAP Concur CFO insights on cost optimization), while practitioners recommend a blend of transparency, automation and governance to capture durable savings (read the ISG report on AI-driven cost transparency).
For practical execution in Brazil, combine supplier consolidation with FinOps-style cloud governance and the EY cost optimization playbook for “get a grip on spending” and “simplify where you can,” and the result is measurable runway expansion without customer‑facing cuts - no layoffs at the top of the org chart, just smarter choices that show up on next month's cash report.
Cost lever | Why it matters for Brazil |
---|---|
Procurement & indirect spend | Consolidation and demand‑management reduce invoice noise and protect margins (EY cost optimization guidance) |
IT/cloud & license rightsizing | Rightsizing and FinOps stop wasteful recurring costs (NinjaOne IT cost optimization resources) |
Process automation & AI transparency | AI surfaces drivers and enables targeted cuts without harming customers (ISG AI cost transparency report, SAP Concur cost transparency insights) |
Simplify products & operating model | Remove low‑value complexity to free resources for growth (EY cost optimization guidance) |
“Trade finance has roots going back 3,000 years to ancient Babylon - the challenge has been adapting centuries-old legal frameworks to digital realities.”
"Which GL accounts appear to have missing transactions based on historical patterns?"
(Up)Which GL accounts are likeliest to hide missing transactions in Brazil's month‑end hustle? Start with the usual suspects: cash and bank accounts, accounts receivable, accounts payable, intercompany balances and accruals - these are the high‑velocity lines where a single missing transaction can
trigger hours of detective work
and delay a close (see Numeric's month‑end reconciliation guide).
AI‑enabled flux analysis and continuous transaction monitors spot gaps early by comparing trial balances to bank statements and AR/AP aging, flagging timing differences, duplicates or entries that vanish vs.
prior periods (SolveXia's GL reconciliation playbook explains the mechanics). For spreadsheet‑first teams, prioritize automated matching rules and clear data governance so anomalies surface as exceptions instead of evenings lost to manual digging; Safebooks' reconciliation best practices show how quality data and rule‑based matching shrink exception counts and speed resolution.
One vivid test: if a cash account balance moves like a calm river most months but shows a sudden, unexplained eddy at period close, treat it as a missing‑transaction alarm - drill to the transaction level, confirm source docs, and log the adjusting entry with an audit trail before sign‑off.
GL Account | Common signs of missing transactions | Quick checks / tools |
---|---|---|
Cash / Bank | Unreconciled bank balance; unexplained variances vs. prior period | Bank statement match, nightly feeds, Numeric‑month‑end reconciliation guide (Numeric month‑end reconciliation guide) |
Accounts Receivable | AR aging gaps; payments not applied | AR aging vs. invoices, transaction drill-down, SolveXia GL reconciliation playbook (SolveXia GL reconciliation playbook - advanced tips) |
Accounts Payable & Accruals | Missing vendor invoices; late accrual reversals | AP aging, three‑way PO matching, automation rules |
Intercompany | Elimination mismatches between entities | Intercompany confirmations, consistent mappings, automated reconciliations |
Fixed assets / Depreciation | Unrecorded disposals or missing capitalizations | Asset register vs. GL, depreciation schedule checks |
"Summarize open AR by aging bucket and top 10 overdue customers"
(Up)Summarize open AR by aging bucket and the top‑10 overdue customers is the simplest, highest‑leverage way to turn invoices into action: run an automated AR aging report that buckets receivables into 0–30, 31–60, 61–90 and 90+ days, then rank customers by total exposure so collectors and the CFO see the true concentration risk at a glance (automation and consolidation cut errors and speed this up - see AR aging best practices at HighRadius).
Prioritize outreach with a tiered playbook - friendly reminders for current invoices, direct follow‑up and payment plans in the 31–60 and 61–90 brackets, and formal demand or collection escalation for the 90+ group - while documenting promises and adjusting credit for repeat late payers (Zone & Co and Tabs show how automation and ERP integration make these steps repeatable and auditable).
The “so what” is immediate: a single top‑10 debtor stuck in the 90+ bucket can distort cash forecasting and force last‑minute borrowing, so surface those names, assign an owner, and measure recovery impact on DSO and cash forecasts before month‑end.
Aging bucket | Recommended action |
---|---|
0–30 days | Automated reminders; monitor for movement |
31–60 days | Direct outreach, offer payment plan or early‑pay incentives |
61–90 days | Senior collections involvement; document promises; reassess credit |
90+ days | Formal demand, collections agency or provision for bad debt |
Top 10 overdue customers | Assign an owner, escalate internally, negotiate terms, log actions for audit |
Conclusion: Deploying These Prompts Safely and Quickly in Brazil
(Up)Deploying the five prompts in Brazil is less about bleeding‑edge tech and more about marrying speed with clear governance: lean, Excel‑centred workflows and real‑time rails (Pix, bank feeds) deliver day‑one value, while LGPD, ANPD guidance and the draft Bill No.
2,338/2023 require explainability, human review and DPIAs for higher‑risk uses - a risk‑based approach similar to the EU AI Act that also brings regulatory sandboxes and enforceable penalties if ignored (see Brazil's AI trends and proposed framework at Chambers Practice Guides and Microsoft's look at how Brazil is redefining finance).
Start small (forecast refreshes, morning cash by entity, AR aging), instrument every prompt with audit trails and role‑based review, and use vendor or in‑house connectors that log data provenance so outputs are reproducible and contestable; the “so what” is tangible: a clean, board‑ready forecast or an auditable cash snapshot in minutes, not days.
For teams that want hands‑on practice in prompt design, human review workflows and LGPD‑aware deployment, the Nucamp AI Essentials for Work bootcamp teaches prompt writing and workplace application with a focused, 15‑week syllabus and registration options to get teams prompt‑ready fast.
Bootcamp | Length | Core courses | Early bird cost | Register |
---|---|---|---|---|
AI Essentials for Work | 15 Weeks | AI at Work: Foundations; Writing AI Prompts; Job‑Based Practical AI Skills | $3,582 | Register for Nucamp AI Essentials for Work (15‑week) |
Frequently Asked Questions
(Up)What are the top 5 AI prompts every finance professional in Brazil should use in 2025?
The article highlights five high‑value prompts: (1) “Refresh the forecast with June actuals and update Q4 projections” - reconciles ERP/bank/Excel actuals and produces updated scenarios and variance explanations; (2) “What's our total cash position by entity, as of this morning?” - near‑real‑time cash by entity using bank feeds and DICT/Pix mappings; (3) “In which cost areas can we reduce spending to extend our runway without impacting revenue retention?” - identifies procurement, cloud/licenses, automation and product complexity levers; (4) “Which GL accounts appear to have missing transactions based on historical patterns?” - flags cash, AR, AP, intercompany and accrual anomalies using pattern analysis and reconciliation rules; (5) “Summarize open AR by aging bucket and top 10 overdue customers” - automated AR aging buckets and prioritized collector actions. Each prompt is designed for quick, auditable outputs that map to existing spreadsheets, ERPs and bank feeds.
What inputs, typical outputs and vendor tools support these prompts?
Required inputs: anonymized or production ERP extracts, bank feeds (Pix/DICT), GL mappings and Excel workbooks. Typical outputs: reconciled actuals and updated forecast scenarios with variance narratives; per‑entity morning cash snapshots; prioritized AR aging with top‑10 overdue customers; lists of GL accounts with missing transactions and exception drilldowns; cost‑reduction levers by area with estimated runway impact. Representative tools and platforms mentioned: Cube, Vena, Datarails, Savant for forecast/Excel continuity; HighRadius, Zone & Co, Tabs for AR automation; SolveXia, Numeric, Safebooks for reconciliation and GL monitoring. Prompts should integrate two‑way Excel sync or live data pipes where possible.
How does Brazil's payments infrastructure (Pix) and local metrics change treasury use cases?
Pix enables near‑real‑time cash visibility if bank feeds and DICT mappings are in place. Key metrics cited: Pix processed 37.4 billion transactions in 2023 (ACI) and roughly 64 billion in 2024 (Stripe); real‑time share of electronic payments was 36.2% in 2023; Pix had 150+ million active users. These volumes make morning per‑entity cash snapshots practical for payroll, supplier cutoffs and short‑term FX hedges - provided teams automate matching (static QR/invoice refs) and enforce audit trails.
How can finance teams deploy these prompts safely and remain LGPD/ANPD‑compliant?
Deploy with a risk‑based governance approach: instrument every prompt with explainable outputs, role‑based human review gates, audit trails and logged data provenance. Perform DPIAs for higher‑risk uses and follow ANPD guidance and Bill No. 2,338/2023 requirements (transparency, contestability, human oversight). Use anonymized test data during model tuning, ensure connectors record source system IDs, and require sign‑off workflows before board‑level outputs. These steps reduce legal exposure while preserving fast, auditable insights.
How were the prompts selected and tested, and what ROI/time‑to‑insight can teams expect?
Selection triangulated vendor prompt libraries (Concourse, Nilus), frequency in real deployments and an Excel‑first Brazil workflow lens. Shortlist criteria: audit‑ready narratives/tables, source‑system connectivity and fast human review. Testing used anonymized ERP extracts and Excel workbooks to validate outputs, measured time‑to‑insight (examples target “live in less than 10 minutes”) and confirmed LGPD compliance steps. Expected ROI: faster close cycles, cleaner AR aging, clearer runway analysis and immediate treasury decisions - and broader context points to significant AI investment (Brazil AI market forecast ~US$49.2B by 2030 and an expected BRL13 billion for AI initiatives by 2025). For hands‑on prompt writing and governed deployment, the article recommends the 15‑week “AI Essentials for Work” bootcamp (early bird cost listed at $3,582) to turn these prompts into day‑one skills.
You may be interested in the following topics as well:
From real-time FX to AI-driven summaries, the Bloomberg Terminal and BloombergGPT remain indispensable for Brazilian traders and asset managers navigating 2025 markets.
Follow a practical 12-month action plan for Brazil to reskill, pilot AI projects and prove impact to your employer in 2025.
Ludo Fourrage
Founder and CEO
Ludovic (Ludo) Fourrage is an education industry veteran, named in 2017 as a Learning Technology Leader by Training Magazine. Before founding Nucamp, Ludo spent 18 years at Microsoft where he led innovation in the learning space. As the Senior Director of Digital Learning at this same company, Ludo led the development of the first of its kind 'YouTube for the Enterprise'. More recently, he delivered one of the most successful Corporate MOOC programs in partnership with top business schools and consulting organizations, i.e. INSEAD, Wharton, London Business School, and Accenture, to name a few. With the belief that the right education for everyone is an achievable goal, Ludo leads the nucamp team in the quest to make quality education accessible