How AI Is Helping Government Companies in Billings Cut Costs and Improve Efficiency
Last Updated: August 15th 2025

Too Long; Didn't Read:
Billings agencies can cut costs and boost efficiency with AI: DMV chatbots handled 400,000 interactions (~40% of Montana), cut calls 15% and wait times from 2 hours to 2 minutes. Prioritize non‑surveillance pilots, vendor transparency, human‑in‑the‑loop checks, and updated contracts by Oct 1, 2025.
Billings government agencies must balance clear efficiency gains from AI with new legal guardrails: Montana's House Bill 178 - signed May 5, 2025 and effective October 1, 2025 - limits government use of AI (banning cognitive behavioral manipulation, certain profiling and broad public surveillance, and requiring transparency and disclosure when AI-generated material is published), so procurement, vendor contracts and published outputs will need revision before the law takes effect (Montana House Bill 178 government AI limits summary).
At the same time, federal proposals like the “Big Beautiful Bill” could introduce a 10-year moratorium that creates uncertainty for local policy and planning (Coverage of the federal "Big Beautiful Bill" proposed moratorium on state AI laws).
Practical next steps for Billings teams include prioritizing non‑surveillance use cases, updating vendor evaluation criteria, and upskilling staff with focused programs such as Nucamp's Nucamp AI Essentials for Work bootcamp to meet new procurement and transparency requirements.
“Hopefully, as a result of those laws there, there are guardrails baked in that prevent the worst abuses that we fear. But this is a technology still in its infancy, and the earlier the law can shape the contours ... the safer people will be. If we lose the ability for the states to regulate, Congress will not be able to keep up with all the risks.”
Attribute | AI Essentials for Work |
---|---|
Description | Practical AI skills for any workplace: tools, prompts, and applied workflows |
Length | 15 Weeks |
Courses | AI at Work: Foundations; Writing AI Prompts; Job-Based Practical AI Skills |
Cost | $3,582 early bird; $3,942 regular |
Syllabus / Register | AI Essentials for Work syllabus and registration |
Table of Contents
- Automating citizen-facing services in Billings, Montana
- Back-office automation and RPA for Billings government companies
- Document automation and legal compliance in Montana
- Predictive analytics, resource planning and public services in Billings
- No-code tools and small government-serving businesses in Billings
- Phased adoption, workforce retraining and risk management in Montana
- Policy, ethics and Montana-specific regulations affecting Billings
- Measuring ROI and KPIs for Billings AI projects
- Practical next steps for Billings government companies
- Frequently Asked Questions
Check out next:
Make smarter procurement choices using our procurement strategies and vendor selection tips for local governments.
Automating citizen-facing services in Billings, Montana
(Up)Billings can bring services online that actually answer residents instead of burying them in pages: Montana's DMV deployment shows how - a conversational agent named BEN routed users to forms, checked required documents and helped market Real ID, driving roughly 400,000 interactions (≈40% of Montana's population), a 15% drop in call volume and a cut in vehicle-services wait time from two hours to two minutes; details on that rollout are documented in the Montana DMV case study (Montana DMV BEN chatbot case study).
For city clerk offices, utility billing, parking tickets and permitting in Billings, a purpose-built resident assistant - implemented with government‑first vendors and retrieval‑augmented search - can deliver 24/7, multilingual answers and immediately reduce phone traffic (vendors report up to a 50% call reduction) while preserving auditability and source controls (Polimorphic resident services chatbot for government).
Design and governance matter: follow conversation‑design best practices (clear handoffs, privacy by design, measurable intents) to avoid common pitfalls and meet Montana's transparency rules (conversation design best practices for government agencies); the practical payoff is straightforward - fewer hold times, faster triage, and staff freed for complex cases.
Metric | Montana DMV Result |
---|---|
Conversations / Interactions | 400,000 |
Population equivalent | ≈40% of Montana's population |
Call volume reduction | 15% |
Wait time (vehicle services) | From 2 hours → 2 minutes |
Real ID conversations | 60,000 (60% interaction rate) |
“Our priority is to serve the public in the most efficient way possible. Polimorphic's AI chatbot has transformed how we serve residents, enabling us to better accomplish that priority. Our website is now more useful, accessible, and user-friendly than ever before. The additional benefit of being able to serve our diverse community using multiple languages has really been a game changer. Integrating the Polimorphic chatbot into our webpage was also remarkably simple – we had it operational and handling requests in just a few minutes. It really was seamless!” - Micah Hassinger, Director of Information Technology, Passaic County, NJ
Back-office automation and RPA for Billings government companies
(Up)Billings finance and back‑office teams can cut labor hours and audit risk by automating repetitive workflows - especially accounts payable, vendor onboarding, and timesheet reconciliation - using RPA combined with document understanding; industry case studies show concrete outcomes: a fivefold increase in billing throughput in a commercial deployment (DataArt RPA billing speed case study), AP automation that eliminated invoice errors and standardized posting into ERPs (MSRcosmos accounts payable automation case study), and sector analyses reporting up to 81% lower processing costs with faster cycle times when digital payables platforms are adopted (Signity invoice processing with RPA analysis).
For Billings city departments and small government vendors, that translates to faster vendor payments, cleaner audit trails that simplify Montana compliance reviews, and freed staff time to handle exceptions rather than data entry - a practical efficiency that directly reduces backlog and late‑payment penalties.
Metric | Reported result | Source |
---|---|---|
Processing speed | 5× increase | DataArt case study |
Invoice accuracy | Zero reported errors | MSRcosmos AP automation |
Cost / cycle improvements | 81% lower costs; 73% faster cycles | Signity analysis |
“We'd be behind on paying bills, not because we didn't have the money, but because our AP system was analog.”
Document automation and legal compliance in Montana
(Up)Document automation projects in Billings must be redesigned to meet Montana's new guardrails: House Bill 178 (signed May 5, 2025; effective Oct 1, 2025) forbids certain profiling, cognitive behavioral manipulation and broad public surveillance, and it requires disclosure when AI‑generated material is published without human review, so automated drafting, redaction and e‑filing pipelines need explicit human‑in‑the‑loop checkpoints, immutable audit logs and contract language that forces vendor transparency and traceability (Montana House Bill 178 summary and restrictions on government AI use).
Procurement teams should add compliance milestones to RFPs, require searchable provenance metadata on every generated document, and reserve rights to inspect systems or logs where bias or unlawful decisions could arise - practical steps that turn abstract restrictions into verifiable controls and avoid costly rework.
Track the bill's legislative history and amendments while drafting policies to ensure timelines and exceptions are honored (HB 178 legislative timeline and actions at Montana Free Press).
Attribute | Detail |
---|---|
Signed by Governor | May 5, 2025 |
Effective date | October 1, 2025 |
Key requirements | Prohibits certain surveillance/profiling; requires disclosure of AI‑generated public materials |
“They should have procedures. They should open their books to make sure we aren't introducing bias when algorithms learn on their own. That is scary stuff.”
Predictive analytics, resource planning and public services in Billings
(Up)Predictive analytics can turn sparse data into sharper day‑to‑day plans for Billings: real‑time sensor feeds and short‑horizon models help cities allocate crews, stagger trash pickups, and adjust traffic signals based on predicted demand rather than fixed schedules.
International cases show the payoff - Seoul's smart bins cut waste overflow by 40% and lowered collection costs, while São Paulo's AI traffic controls trimmed travel times by 25% - so Billings can pilot focused projects (waste-route optimisation, event‑day curb management, and SURTRAC‑style signal timing) that target clear operational savings and fewer manual schedule changes (government AI case studies and real‑world municipal AI successes; SURTrAC‑style traffic signal optimization case study).
Start small, measure rigorously, and use proven KPIs so pilots either scale or stop quickly - see methods for tracking model performance and ROI before committing capital (measuring AI impact and monitoring models in government); a pilot that reduces one recurring overflow route by even 40% buys both budget relief and time for staff to focus on exceptions. • Use case: AI‑driven waste management (Seoul) - Reported impact: 40% reduction in waste overflow • Use case: Smart traffic control (São Paulo) - Reported impact: 25% reduced travel time • Use case: Predictive policing (US tests) - Reported impact: 20% reduction in crime rates in pilots
No-code tools and small government-serving businesses in Billings
(Up)Small firms that serve Billings government offices can unlock rapid, low‑cost wins by pairing no‑code chatbots and workflow automations to handle routine citizen requests, schedule appointments, and keep records in sync without hiring developers: Chatfuel's visual bot builder plus its “Export via Zapier” flows can add contacts, book Calendly appointments, or push form data into Airtable - all set up with templates and no code (Chatfuel and Zapier integration for marketing automation).
For teams that need true two‑way data consistency - so permit updates entered on a spreadsheet immediately appear in a CRM - tools like Unito provide bidirectional syncs that eliminate copy‑paste errors and stale records (Unito no-code bidirectional sync tool).
The payoff is concrete: Chatfuel case studies show large customers cutting response times dramatically (HelloFresh reported a 76% drop), which translates in city‑service terms to fewer hold lines, faster permit turnarounds, and smaller vendors being able to scale services to multiple departments without added headcount.
Tool | Best for | Notable feature |
---|---|---|
Chatfuel | Citizen chat, appointment booking | Visual no‑code builder + Zapier export/import |
Zapier | Connecting many apps | 4,000+ app integrations; trigger→action “Zaps” |
Unito | Two‑way syncs across tools | Bidirectional, rule‑driven syncing to avoid data drift |
Phased adoption, workforce retraining and risk management in Montana
(Up)Phased adoption in Billings should pair short, measurable pilots with rapid retraining so AI reduces cost without creating staffing gaps: Governor Gianforte's new 406 JOBS Initiative charges the State Workforce Innovation Board to coordinate AI skills, apprenticeships and public‑private partnerships, and directs the Department of Labor to expand AI training in schools and job programs - so municipal leaders can time procurement and training to the state rollout (Montana 406 JOBS workforce initiative and AI training).
Use targeted bootcamps and role redesigns (for example, shifting records and reporting staff into supervisory, audit‑focused roles) to preserve institutional knowledge while introducing human‑in‑the‑loop controls (Government jobs at risk from AI in Billings and adaptation strategies).
Pair this with risk management for high‑impact local use cases - wildfire risk and mitigation planning are explicitly recommended AI priorities for Montana - so pilots focus on measurable benefits and monitored models before scaling (State AI use recommendations for Montana: wildfire mitigation priority).
The practical payoff: align training timelines to the SWIB's 90‑day implementation window and start one 6–12 week pilot that proves savings or stops quickly, avoiding sunk costs and accelerating staff redeployment.
Metric / Milestone | Detail |
---|---|
Non‑participating Montanans | ≈340,000 not actively in labor force |
Working‑age not seeking work | >100,000 |
SWIB implementation timeline | Implementation plan due within 90 days |
“406 JOBS stands for four pathways to employment, zero barriers to work, and six high‑demand sectors,”
Policy, ethics and Montana-specific regulations affecting Billings
(Up)Montana's new statewide guardrails make policy and ethics a practical constraint for Billings: House Bill 178 (signed May 5, 2025; effective October 1, 2025) explicitly forbids government use of AI for cognitive behavioral manipulation, certain profiling/classification that risks unlawful discrimination, malicious purposes, and broad public surveillance while requiring disclosure when AI‑generated material is published without human review and transparency for public‑facing AI interfaces - so city teams must bake human‑in‑the‑loop checkpoints, searchable provenance metadata, and updated vendor contract clauses into procurement now to meet the October deadline (Montana HB 178 summary on limits for government AI use).
Complementing HB 178, Montana's “Right to Compute” and related 2025 measures push deployers of AI‑controlled critical infrastructure to adopt formal risk‑management plans that align with NIST's AI RMF, meaning transit, water, and emergency systems pilots in Billings should document impact assessments and auditability from day one (NCSL 2025 state AI legislation overview and guidance on Right to Compute); the concrete payoff is simple: meet legal transparency now and avoid forced rollback of automated services after deployment.
Item | Detail |
---|---|
Bill | House Bill 178 - Limit government use of AI systems |
Signed | May 5, 2025 |
Effective | October 1, 2025 |
Key prohibitions | Cognitive behavioral manipulation; certain profiling/classification; unlawful discrimination; malicious uses; broad public surveillance (exceptions apply) |
Required actions | Disclosure for published AI outputs; transparency in public interfaces; risk management for critical infrastructure per NIST AI RMF |
Measuring ROI and KPIs for Billings AI projects
(Up)Measure Billings AI projects across five linked KPI areas - model quality, system quality, adoption, business operations, and financial impact - so decisions move from “hope” to evidence: use model metrics (precision/F1 or autorater scores for unbounded outputs) and system metrics (uptime, latency, error rates) to detect drift; track adoption (active‑user rate, queries per user) to confirm real use; and translate operational gains (call/chat containment, average handle time, processing time) into dollars so finance teams can compute ROI. Tie every dashboard back to Montana requirements - add a compliance indicator for provenance/disclosure logs to meet HB 178's transparency rules - and benchmark pilots against concrete outcomes (for example, the Montana DMV chatbot drove a ~15% drop in calls and slashed a vehicle‑services wait from two hours to two minutes).
For practical guidance on KPI selection and ROI calculation (including an ROI formula and cost‑savings breakdown), see detailed frameworks from Acacia Advisors and Google Cloud's gen‑AI KPI guidance for public‑sector deployments (Acacia Advisors AI KPI and ROI frameworks for public-sector AI projects; Google Cloud gen-AI KPIs and measurement methods for government deployments).
KPI category | Example metric | Typical target / example |
---|---|---|
Model quality | Precision / F1; autorater score | Improve baseline F1 by X% (use human calibration) |
System quality | Uptime; latency; error rate | >99% uptime; low single‑digit error rate |
Adoption | Active users; queries per user | Adoption rate rising month‑over‑month |
Operational | Call containment; processing time | Montana DMV example: 15% call reduction; wait time 2h → 2min |
Business value / ROI | Net financial gain / total AI investment | ROI = (Cost savings + Additional revenue − Ongoing costs) ÷ Total investment × 100% |
Practical next steps for Billings government companies
(Up)Practical next steps for Billings government companies: begin with a rapid inventory of any public‑facing or decision‑adjacent AI and update procurement docs and vendor contracts to require searchable provenance metadata, mandatory human‑in‑the‑loop checkpoints, and clear disclosure on published outputs so deployments meet Montana's House Bill 178 transparency and use limits before the law's October 1, 2025 effective date (Montana House Bill 178 summary and analysis).
Prioritize low‑risk pilots (customer service chatbots, permit triage, and back‑office RPA) with short, measurable KPIs and automatic rollback triggers so projects either scale or stop quickly; align staff upskilling to that cadence by enrolling key operators and procurement leads in targeted training such as Nucamp AI Essentials for Work registration and syllabus to ensure prompt writing, governance controls, and audit‑ready practices.
Stay engaged with Montana's evolving legislative framework and document every compliance milestone (disclosure banners, audit logs, inspection rights) to preserve service continuity and avoid costly rework if state rules tighten (coverage of Montana's AI framework bills); a single, enforceable contract clause requiring provenance metadata and human review can be the difference between a compliant pilot and a forced rollback.
Attribute | AI Essentials for Work |
---|---|
Description | Practical AI skills for any workplace: tools, prompts, and applied workflows |
Length | 15 Weeks |
Courses | AI at Work: Foundations; Writing AI Prompts; Job‑Based Practical AI Skills |
Cost | $3,582 early bird; $3,942 regular |
Syllabus / Register | AI Essentials for Work syllabus and registration |
“There's a new world. Let's open the door and then start restricting in a narrow, detailed way, not like other states that are basically trying to ban everything.” - Sen. Daniel Zolnikov
Frequently Asked Questions
(Up)How can AI reduce costs and improve efficiency for Billings government agencies?
AI delivers savings and efficiency through citizen‑facing chatbots that cut call volume (Montana DMV reported a ~15% reduction and cut vehicle‑services wait time from 2 hours to 2 minutes), back‑office RPA and document understanding that increase processing speed (reported 5× throughput) and eliminate invoice errors, predictive analytics for resource planning (examples: waste overflow reduced 40%, traffic travel time reduced 25%), and no‑code automations that speed response and reduce manual work for small vendors. Combined, these reduce labor hours, lower processing costs, and free staff for higher‑value tasks.
What legal and policy constraints must Billings follow when adopting AI?
Billings must comply with Montana House Bill 178 (signed May 5, 2025; effective October 1, 2025), which prohibits cognitive behavioral manipulation, certain profiling/classification, malicious uses, and broad public surveillance, and requires disclosure when AI‑generated public materials are published without human review and transparency for public interfaces. Complementary measures (e.g., Right to Compute and NIST AI RMF alignment) require risk‑management plans and auditability for critical infrastructure. Procurement, vendor contracts, and published outputs must be updated to include provenance metadata, human‑in‑the‑loop checkpoints, and inspection rights to meet these requirements.
Which practical next steps should Billings teams take now to deploy AI safely and compliantly?
Start with a rapid inventory of all public‑facing or decision‑adjacent AI, revise RFPs and vendor contracts to require searchable provenance metadata and mandatory human‑in‑the‑loop review, and add compliance milestones and audit log access. Prioritize low‑risk pilots (customer service chatbots, permit triage, AP automation) with measurable KPIs and automatic rollback triggers. Align staff upskilling to pilot timelines (6–12 week pilots) and enroll procurement and operators in targeted training (e.g., practical AI bootcamps) to meet Montana's October 1, 2025 deadline.
How should Billings measure ROI and performance of AI pilots?
Measure across five KPI areas: model quality (precision/F1, autorater scores), system quality (uptime, latency, error rates), adoption (active users, queries per user), operational metrics (call containment, average handle time, processing time), and financial impact (net gains vs. investment). Tie dashboards to compliance indicators (provenance/disclosure logs) and benchmark against concrete outcomes (e.g., Montana DMV: 15% call reduction; wait time 2h→2min). Use an ROI formula: (Cost savings + Additional revenue − Ongoing costs) ÷ Total investment × 100%.
What governance and workforce actions are recommended to avoid staffing gaps and legal risk?
Adopt phased pilots with rapid retraining so staff move to supervisory and audit roles, align local training to state initiatives like the 406 JOBS program and SWIB implementation timelines, and require human‑in‑the‑loop checkpoints and immutable audit logs in automated pipelines. Add contractual transparency clauses and compliance milestones to protect against bias and ensure vendor traceability. For high‑impact use cases (e.g., critical infrastructure, wildfire planning), perform documented impact assessments and NIST‑aligned risk management before scaling.
You may be interested in the following topics as well:
Advocating for policy advocacy for transparent AI procurement helps protect worker rights as agencies adopt new tools.
Make budgets smarter with Policy simulation and ROI modeling tools that forecast service demand and fiscal impacts.
Ludo Fourrage
Founder and CEO
Ludovic (Ludo) Fourrage is an education industry veteran, named in 2017 as a Learning Technology Leader by Training Magazine. Before founding Nucamp, Ludo spent 18 years at Microsoft where he led innovation in the learning space. As the Senior Director of Digital Learning at this same company, Ludo led the development of the first of its kind 'YouTube for the Enterprise'. More recently, he delivered one of the most successful Corporate MOOC programs in partnership with top business schools and consulting organizations, i.e. INSEAD, Wharton, London Business School, and Accenture, to name a few. With the belief that the right education for everyone is an achievable goal, Ludo leads the nucamp team in the quest to make quality education accessible