Top 5 Jobs in Retail That Are Most at Risk from AI in Australia - And How to Adapt

By Ludo Fourrage

Last Updated: September 5th 2025

Retail worker using AI tools beside a self-checkout kiosk in an Australian store

Too Long; Didn't Read:

Retail roles most at risk from AI in Australia include stock controllers (34%), customer service reps (31%), e‑commerce/copywriters (27%), checkout staff and back‑office clerks, as 41% of SMEs use AI and one in three shoppers use AI, with generative AI worth AUD$45–115B by 2030. Upskill in prompts, supervision, exception handling.

AI is already changing retail across Australia: the National AI Adoption Tracker shows retail among the top sectors for uptake, with 41% of SMEs using AI, while shopper-facing use has jumped - about one in three Australians now uses AI when they shop - so both floor staff and back‑office roles are feeling the impact.

From personalised recommendations and chatbots to inventory forecasting and dynamic pricing, retailers are seeing efficiency and sales gains (generative AI alone is projected to add AUD$45–115 billion annually by 2030), but routine, repeatable tasks are most exposed; the smartest response is practical upskilling in prompts and supervision of models.

For a government overview see the AI Adoption Tracker and for industry examples read How AI is transforming retail in Australia, or explore the AI Essentials for Work bootcamp registration to build job-ready AI skills.

Bootcamp Details
AI Essentials for Work 15 weeks; courses: AI at Work: Foundations, Writing AI Prompts, Job Based Practical AI Skills; Early bird $3,582 - after $3,942; Register for the AI Essentials for Work bootcamp / AI Essentials for Work syllabus

"Australia needs to make the most of the opportunities that artificial intelligence and other emerging technologies like robotics and quantum provide."

Table of Contents

  • Methodology: How we picked the Top 5 at-risk retail jobs
  • Stock controllers / Inventory managers - why they're vulnerable (34% per BizCover)
  • Customer service representatives (in-store, phone, chat) - why they're vulnerable (31% per BizCover)
  • E-commerce specialists / Digital merchandisers / Copywriters - why they're vulnerable (27% per BizCover)
  • Checkout staff / Sales assistants - why they're vulnerable to self-checkout and automation
  • Back-office roles: Order processing, basic bookkeeping, data entry and pricing clerks - why they're vulnerable
  • Conclusion: Practical next steps and resources to adapt in Australia
  • Frequently Asked Questions

Check out next:

Methodology: How we picked the Top 5 at-risk retail jobs

(Up)

Selection prioritised roles that combine high AI exposure with routine task profiles, using BizCover's Australian Small Business AI Report 2025 as the backbone - an online survey of 1,323 responses (final small‑business sample 965) conducted in April 2025 - supplemented by sector signals such as marketing and ICT uptake and employer views on task vs role replacement; roles were flagged where businesses report frequent AI use, clear task automation potential, and talent gaps that make automation more attractive.

Task-level evidence (repetitive data work, standardised copy, predictable inventory processes), adoption measures (how many businesses already use or intend to use AI) and sentiment on skills and hiring were weighted most heavily, then cross‑checked against retail‑specific findings in Amperity's 2025 State of AI in Retail to ensure the customer‑experience and data‑infrastructure angle was covered.

Finally, practical adaptions - upskilling for creativity, communication and model supervision highlighted in Nucamp's retail upskilling guidance - informed which roles are “at risk” versus those that are simply changing, so the Top 5 reflects both exposure to automation and realistic pathways to adapt via training and role redesign; for full source details see the BizCover report and Amperity's retail study.

Survey Details
Survey BizCover online survey, April 2025
Total responses 1,323 (final small‑business sample: 965)
Key sectors analysed Marketing, Consulting, ICT, Healthcare, Retail (sector reports available)

“As AI evolves, so too will the Australian workforce... the outlook remains optimistic as small business owners explore how to best integrate AI while preserving what makes their businesses unique and, of course, human.”

Fill this form to download the Bootcamp Syllabus

And learn about Nucamp's Bootcamps and why aspiring developers choose us.

Stock controllers / Inventory managers - why they're vulnerable (34% per BizCover)

(Up)

Stock controllers and inventory managers are flagged as highly exposed (34% per BizCover) because the bulk of their work - cycle counts, reorder triggers, demand forecasting and simple SKU-level decisions - is exactly the kind of repeatable, data-rich work that AI, POS-integrations and automated inventory systems handle best; real‑time tracking, smart reordering and predictive forecasting mean fewer manual stock checks and faster, more accurate replenishment.

Industry write-ups show automation both reduces errors and reshapes labour: StockIQ explains how demand forecasting and automated inventory tools shift roles from manual pick‑and‑count work to technical oversight and analytics, while Lightspeed outlines how POS + inventory automation removes routine counting and reordering tasks.

On the warehouse floor, ASRS and robotic picking can be decisive - Kardex case studies note systems that let one operator manage what used to take multiple pickers, freeing or redeploying up to two‑thirds of staff - and that combination of labour pressure and clear ROI is why inventory roles are vulnerable unless teams rapidly upskill for data literacy, system supervision and exception handling to stay central to decision-making.

These automated systems work well with others, increase productivity by two-thirds, and most importantly - they won't no-show on you.

Customer service representatives (in-store, phone, chat) - why they're vulnerable (31% per BizCover)

(Up)

Customer service reps - whether on the shop floor, the phone or live chat - are highly exposed (31% per BizCover) because the job is dominated by repeatable, high‑volume tasks (order checks, refunds, status updates) that agentic AI can resolve end‑to‑end across CRMs and fulfilment systems, operate 24/7 and slash wait times; Codewave explains how these AI agents plan, act and escalate when needed, while contact‑centre tech (even accent‑normalisation) smooths conversations and trims call lengths.

That automation promise is already playing out in Australia - the Commonwealth Bank cut 45 call‑centre roles after an AI rollout, a move that unions say underscores the need for retraining and redeployment - yet customers remain wary: research shows big gaps between expectation and reality (many Australians still report bots failing to resolve issues and demand guaranteed human escalation).

The takeaway: predictable, transactional queries are the clearest short‑term risk, and the most vivid consequence is simple - one well‑deployed AI agent can quietly replace dozens of routine tasks unless teams shift toward oversight, escalation management and empathy‑led problem solving.

Read more: Agentic AI in Australian service - Codewave article, Australian customer expectation gap - Dynamic Business report, and Commonwealth Bank call-centre cuts - ABC News report.

Metric Figure / Source
Customer service roles flagged as at‑risk 31% (BizCover)
Expect human escalation vs experience 86% expect escalation; 38% report it regularly (Dynamic Business)
Bots failing to resolve issues (Australia) 51% report failures (Dynamic Business)
Real‑world job impact 45 call‑centre jobs cut after an AI chatbot rollout (ABC)

“Resolution trumps technology.”

Fill this form to download the Bootcamp Syllabus

And learn about Nucamp's Bootcamps and why aspiring developers choose us.

E-commerce specialists / Digital merchandisers / Copywriters - why they're vulnerable (27% per BizCover)

(Up)

E‑commerce specialists, digital merchandisers and copywriters top the “at risk” list (27% per BizCover) because generative AI now handles the repeatable, high-volume parts of their jobs - auto‑drafting SEO product pages, personalised campaign copy, shoppable images and dynamic banners - faster and cheaper than manual workflows; Amplience: AI and the Future of Content Creation in Retail Marketing explains how AI can produce tailored product and campaign content almost instantly, while Kimonix: Generative AI for Online Retail documents bulk listing tools and image generators that scale visuals and descriptions across thousands of SKUs.

The numbers back this up: many retailers are already using generative AI for marketing and advertising (see HelloRep: 42% of retailers use generative AI (2025 statistics)), so for Australian teams the practical threat is real - routine drafting and merchandising hours are being compressed into minutes unless roles shift toward creative strategy, prompt design, quality assurance and headless‑CMS integration.

Upskilling for prompt engineering, model supervision and content governance is the clearest way to stay indispensable; for practical steps see Nucamp AI Essentials for Work syllabus: Upskilling retail staff for AI.

At‑risk task Evidence / source
Automated product descriptions & SEO Amplience: AI and the Future of Content Creation in Retail Marketing, Kimonix: Generative AI for Online Retail
Personalised marketing & campaign copy HelloRep: 42% of retailers use generative AI (2025 statistics)
Dynamic visual merchandising & images Amplience: AI and the Future of Content Creation in Retail Marketing, Kimonix: Generative AI for Online Retail

You are an expert eCommerce copywriter trained to create on-point product descriptions for [Brand Name]. Focus on [product category] and highlight key features, benefits, and unique selling points that match [Brand Name]'s current format, style, and voice. Generate engaging, SEO-friendly product descriptions aimed at these types of shoppers: [target audience]. Use a [friendly/professional/luxury] tone, include sensory language, address pain points, and finish with a CTA. Keep it between [100–150 words] and incorporate relevant keywords provided, but make sure they fit naturally.

Checkout staff / Sales assistants - why they're vulnerable to self-checkout and automation

(Up)

Checkout staff and floor sales assistants face clear short‑term risk because the checkout itself is being reimagined: self‑checkout kiosks, smart carts that scan items as they're added and cashier‑less store designs take on the repetitive scanning, bagging and payment tasks that used to define these roles.

The result is both efficiency gains for retailers and extra pressure for frontline teams who still need to monitor queues, manage

unexpected item in the bagging area

interventions and respond to theft or customer frustration - headaches that can make one till into a magnet for complaints.

Industry reporting shows self‑checkout is already mainstream (most grocery stores offer it and thousands of outlets have adopted autonomous checkouts) and retailers see faster transactions and lower labour costs from these systems, while smart video and IoT can shift staff toward exception handling and loss prevention.

For Australian retailers and employees the practical response is to move from transactional till work into tech‑supervision, customer recovery and experience roles - practical upskilling is covered in resources about upskilling retail staff for AI and in analyses of self‑checkout challenges for employees.

Metric Figure / Source
Grocery stores offering self‑checkout 96% (The Payments Association:

The rise of self‑checkouts

)
Global retailers with autonomous checkouts since 2024 ~10,000 stores (The Payments Association)
Self‑checkout speeds up transactions ~30% faster (The Payments Association)
Practical staff challenges (e.g. bagging errors, interventions) Documented stress and intervention burden for staff (SeeChange:

Self‑checkout challenges for retail employees

)

Fill this form to download the Bootcamp Syllabus

And learn about Nucamp's Bootcamps and why aspiring developers choose us.

Back-office roles: Order processing, basic bookkeeping, data entry and pricing clerks - why they're vulnerable

(Up)

Back‑office roles that centre on order processing, basic bookkeeping, data entry and pricing clerks are among the most exposed in Australian retail because RPA and rule‑based AI excel at the exact, repetitive flows these jobs do: pulling invoices from email, extracting fields, reconciling accounts and updating pricing matrices across legacy systems with no coffee breaks or typos.

Examples from Australia show the scale and speed of change - the ATO has used RPA to cut manual audit steps and free auditors for judgement work, while bank pilots moved a four‑day error‑amendment task to same‑day resolution and saved hundreds of staff hours per month - so the

so what?

is sharp: a bot that reliably matches invoices or applies cash can quietly remove the bulk of routine hours unless staff shift toward exception handling, governance and analytics.

Practical responses include learning to supervise bots, build simple automations and translate cleaned data into business insight; for technical context see CIAT analysis of robotic process automation in tax administrations, UiPath MyState Bank RPA automation case study, and CPA Australia article on RPA impact for management accounting (one finance manager went from auditing 10% of a spreadsheet to overseeing a robot that checks 100%).

Example Impact / Evidence Source
Australian Tax Office (ATO) RPA used to remove manual audit steps (~5% manual actions reduced) CIAT analysis of robotic process automation in tax administrations
MyState Bank (pilot) 29 processes automated; ~435 hours saved/month; cut a 4‑day task to same‑day UiPath MyState Bank RPA automation case study
Finance team example Robot audited 100% vs human 10%, enabling higher‑value follow‑up work CPA Australia article on RPA impact for management accounting

Conclusion: Practical next steps and resources to adapt in Australia

(Up)

Practical next steps for Australian retailers start with the basics: map routine tasks flagged in this report and prioritise those for safe automation, put in place a clear AI policy and staff training program, and insist on supplier due diligence and indemnities so third‑party tools don't introduce IP or privacy risk - all recommendations echoed in legal guidance on generative AI in Australia (see risks around training data, copyright and APP compliance).

Make record‑keeping non‑negotiable: TwoBirds urges businesses to

keep a paper trail

of human involvement and prompts so ownership, attribution and automated decisions can be audited; that single habit can be the difference between a smooth rollout and costly disputes.

Operationally, focus on three practical moves this quarter - (1) train frontline and back‑office teams for prompts, exception handling and model supervision, (2) run small pilots that measure customer resolution and privacy impacts before scaling, and (3) update privacy policies to reflect substantially automated decisions and cross‑border data flows as the Privacy Act reforms land.

For teams that want structured, work‑facing training, the AI Essentials for Work bootcamp teaches prompt writing, model supervision and job‑based AI skills in 15 weeks; see the AI Essentials syllabus and register for the course to build defensible, practical capability while Australia's regulation and guidance evolve.

Program Details
AI Essentials for Work 15 weeks; courses: AI at Work: Foundations, Writing AI Prompts, Job Based Practical AI Skills; Early bird $3,582 - after $3,942; Register for Nucamp AI Essentials for Work (15-week bootcamp) / AI Essentials for Work syllabus (Nucamp)

Frequently Asked Questions

(Up)

Which retail jobs in Australia are most at risk from AI?

The article identifies five roles most exposed to AI: (1) Stock controllers / inventory managers - highly exposed to automated forecasting and POS-integrated reordering (flagged 34% at-risk by BizCover); (2) Customer service representatives (in-store, phone, chat) - routine queries and CRM tasks can be handled by AI agents (31% at-risk per BizCover); (3) E‑commerce specialists / digital merchandisers / copywriters - generative AI can auto-create product descriptions, campaign copy and visuals (27% at-risk per BizCover); (4) Checkout staff / sales assistants - self-checkouts, smart carts and cashier-less designs reduce transactional till work (widespread adoption in grocery and thousands of autonomous checkouts globally); (5) Back-office roles (order processing, basic bookkeeping, data entry, pricing clerks) - RPA and rule-based AI excel at repetitive reconciliation and data extraction. Each role is vulnerable because AI and automation target repeatable, data-rich tasks, though many of these jobs can be reshaped rather than eliminated.

What evidence and methodology were used to select the Top 5 at-risk retail jobs?

Selection prioritised roles combining high AI exposure with routine task profiles. The backbone was BizCover's Australian Small Business AI Report 2025 (online survey of 1,323 responses; final small-business sample 965, April 2025), supplemented by sector adoption signals (marketing, ICT), employer views on task vs role replacement, and retail-specific findings from Amperity's 2025 State of AI in Retail. Analysts weighted task-level evidence (repetitive data work, standardised copy), adoption measures (businesses already using or intending to use AI) and hiring sentiment, then cross-checked results and used upskilling pathways to distinguish ‘at risk' from ‘changing' roles.

How widespread is AI adoption in Australian retail and what are the projected economic impacts?

Retail is among the top sectors for AI uptake in Australia: the National AI Adoption Tracker reports about 41% of SMEs using AI. Shopper-facing AI use has also increased - roughly one in three Australians now uses AI when they shop. At an economic scale, generative AI alone is projected to add approximately AUD $45–115 billion annually by 2030. These figures indicate both rapid adoption and significant potential productivity gains, especially for tasks that are standardisable and data-driven.

How can retail workers and teams adapt to reduce risk and stay employable?

Practical adaptation focuses on upskilling and role redesign: learn prompt writing and prompt engineering, model supervision, data literacy and analytics, exception handling, customer-empathy and escalation management, and creative strategy for content roles. Employers and workers should prioritise training that is job-facing (e.g., supervising models, quality assurance, translating cleaned data into insights). The article points to structured options such as the AI Essentials for Work bootcamp (15 weeks; courses include AI at Work: Foundations, Writing AI Prompts, Job Based Practical AI Skills; early-bird and full prices noted by the program) to build these capabilities.

What immediate operational steps should retailers take to adopt AI safely and protect staff?

Three practical moves recommended this quarter: (1) Train frontline and back-office teams in prompt use, exception handling and model supervision; (2) Run small, measurable pilots that track customer resolution, privacy impacts and human escalation rates before scaling; (3) Update privacy policies and supplier due diligence - insist on indemnities, keep audit trails (record prompts and human involvement), and ensure governance so third-party tools don't introduce IP or privacy risk. These steps, combined with redeploying staff into supervision, governance and customer-recovery roles, help balance productivity gains with fair workforce transition.

You may be interested in the following topics as well:

N

Ludo Fourrage

Founder and CEO

Ludovic (Ludo) Fourrage is an education industry veteran, named in 2017 as a Learning Technology Leader by Training Magazine. Before founding Nucamp, Ludo spent 18 years at Microsoft where he led innovation in the learning space. As the Senior Director of Digital Learning at this same company, Ludo led the development of the first of its kind 'YouTube for the Enterprise'. More recently, he delivered one of the most successful Corporate MOOC programs in partnership with top business schools and consulting organizations, i.e. INSEAD, Wharton, London Business School, and Accenture, to name a few. ​With the belief that the right education for everyone is an achievable goal, Ludo leads the nucamp team in the quest to make quality education accessible